DiscussMormonism.com

Dr. Shades wrote: ↑

Mon Apr 15, 2024 2:34 pm

Philo Sofee wrote: ↑

Sun Apr 14, 2024 9:17 pm

Yer a funny man sometimes Shades. Thanks for making my day!

Will you do this again? Yes or no?

I have no idea, I cannot foretell the future, the church took away my crystal ball in my last bishop's interview.....

Thanks to all who came out and enjoyed the music and the fun. You know who you are......

Dr. Shades wrote: ↑

Sun Apr 14, 2024 4:46 pm

Philo Sofee wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:42 pm

Judging by your reaction, it looks like you’re going to continue to allow ChatGPT to type your opening posts for you. Am I correct?

Yer a funny man sometimes Shades. Thanks for making my day!

Fence Sitter wrote: ↑

Sun Apr 14, 2024 8:38 pm

You should ask Shades to participate.

It might artificially stimulate him!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1q4_Ig3maw

I have a cool show tonight showing how A.I. can help in navigating through Mormonism's issues, as well as having so terrific fun with it to poke it in the ribs. Should be fun and funny tonight. Look forward to seeing you all there.

Doctor CamNC4Me wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 7:13 pm

Dr. Shades wrote: ↑

Thu Apr 11, 2024 5:08 pm

Because there’s literally no thought behind it.

Programmers put a lot of thought into it. When their algorithms don’t produce the results they prefer they enact GlobalFlood2.0.exe to get them in line.

- Doc

Gadianton I was at a gathering with Henry Eyring speaking a few years ago, and he went on and on about how hard the work is in the spirit world, and the success there isn't any greater than here. And so the the pair must BOTH convert and live up to their covenants in the spirit world, and then the ...

Dr. Shades wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 11:31 am

Philo Sofee wrote: ↑

Thu Apr 11, 2024 11:00 pm

It's not about thought, it's about analyzing the logic of arguments and evidence.

So, you're content with a computer program spoon-feeding the logic of arguments and evidence to you?

I think there’s a difference between someone doing something decent every now and again, and someone who is decent. Brigham Young may have done a decent thing every now and again. But other people of his time being as bad as he, bad things happening to him and his etc does not excuse him from stand...

Dr. Shades wrote: ↑

Thu Apr 11, 2024 5:08 pm

Philo Sofee wrote: ↑

Wed Apr 10, 2024 11:09 pm

Yes indeed. Why not?

Because there’s literally no thought behind it.

It's not about thought, it's about analyzing the logic of arguments and evidence.