DiscussMormonism.com

Just to update everyone, I never heard back from Professor Schub. I suspect he is no longer working at Trinity College, which might explain why he no longer uses that address.

But you'll be sure to respond over at MAD where you know you'll have the freedom to say whatever you want without rebuttal.

Right?

Looks like Wilbur lost his mojo again.

Run along there princess.

well, now I know you are lying, and I am sure you know you are, but you are counting on the fact that I can not prove it so you will deny it. Exactly! That's all he needs. If there is plausible deniability, he will do so. We saw this recently with his denial of calling Emma Smith a bitch. Calling t...

I not only acknowledged it, but sincerely apologized for it. Only because you were forced to, which is the point. Up until the time definitive proof was presented, you vehemently denied it. In other words, you lied because you thought you could get away with it. Likewise, you lie about the C-word i...

All anyone will ever need to know about William Schryver and why he cannot be trusted to represent source material in honesty, nor can be be expected to develop apologetic arguments that can withstand the test of time (in most cases 10 minutes): Challenge for Will Will Schryver's Deception in Pundit...

Respecting a poster’s privacy rights here is what I think is paramount, and what the debate was all about.It doesn’t matter whether that poster is Mormon, non-Mormon, ex-Mormon, or even “rabid apologist”. From what I can tell, it has very little to do with a right to privacy. It isn't about him bei...

That is funny Trev, I knew we had our moments in the past but I couldn't remember what it was we disagreed on. I'm not a big Sarah Palin fan (she obviously isn't the sharpest tool in the shed, but neither is Nancy Pelosi) I just have a tendency to defend people I think are getting a raw deal from bi...

This reminds me of the crap apologetic that there was nothing wrong in Joseph Smith taking the wives of other men, simply because he didn't FORCE them hand them over. They had a choice! No, instead he called the women who rejected him, "whores and liars," and the men he thought he might ha...

The wiki rightly describes the Mormon LAW of Consecration as a form of Christian socialism, because this is precisely what it is. This causes problems for Right Wing Mormons for sure. Saying it was voluntary, therefore it is exactly opposite of socialism, is nonsense. Both have the same goal; the re...