Search found 26 matches
- Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:03 am
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: Official origins of the temple garment?
- Replies: 34
- Views: 3185
Re: Official origins of the temple garment?
Gazalem (just because this is of particular interest to me)... I don't think that there is any evidence that a square or compass for that matter were early christian symbols. In Gazalem's mind there is, because he has NEED for supporting evidence. You are being objective. Gazalame cannot remember t...
- Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:00 am
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: Official origins of the temple garment?
- Replies: 34
- Views: 3185
Re: Official origins of the temple garment?
??? did I imply that?The Nehor wrote:I didn't say it was the same girl. ;)
Follow me bud, read, think, post, read, think again, submit.
- Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:49 am
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: Official origins of the temple garment?
- Replies: 34
- Views: 3185
Re: Official origins of the temple garment?
wow you have been dating for a long time...The Nehor wrote:I started dating two weeks after I got home from my Mission.
- Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:27 am
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: Mormon Expression Podcast Episode 4
- Replies: 55
- Views: 3779
Re: Mormon Expression Podcast Episode 4
Thank you John for this podcast.
I never knew about the rediscovered papyrus.
This is the best factual evidence yet. I am feeling good enough that i might share this with a coworker.
I never knew about the rediscovered papyrus.
This is the best factual evidence yet. I am feeling good enough that i might share this with a coworker.
- Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:25 am
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: Mormon Expression Podcast Episode 4
- Replies: 55
- Views: 3779
Re: Mormon Expression Podcast Episode 4
I think that the name of the podcast site needs to be changed. Mormon Expressions is misleading. However, if John would change the name to Exmormon Expressions the name of the podcast site would be much more honest in its representations. Boo hoo, go back to eatting mo'pologetic turds out of the MA...
- Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:19 am
- Forum: Celestial Forum
- Topic: Restoration of the sealing keys for marriage?
- Replies: 25
- Views: 4887
Re: Restoration of the sealing keys for marriage?
Yep. that's why it is paramount to get the warm fuzzy about Joey and his book of pretend indian tales.harmony wrote:mormonmessages wrote:
Remember, God and Jesus told Joseph that all other sect were wrong and their creeds were abominations.
That pesky lack of witnesses raises its head again.
- Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:12 am
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: Official origins of the temple garment?
- Replies: 34
- Views: 3185
Re: Official origins of the temple garment?
Huh, you and Paul O on the paul-liz thread lolThe Nehor wrote:Entertaining myself.
With the amount of time you seem to spend here and the MAAD board, I'd guess you aren't married?
Oh? How long since your mission?The Nehor wrote:True, though I am dating at the moment.
- Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:53 am
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: Official origins of the temple garment?
- Replies: 34
- Views: 3185
Re: Official origins of the temple garment?
Someone asked why do I post these supposed easy to research questions? To get them out there for other lurkers and the like to read. This is my only outlet to the hell that I live and work in. You're venting? Good to know. Yeah and so? What are you doing here? With the amount of time you seem to sp...
- Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:50 am
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: Continuing revelation does not discredit existing revelation
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1297
Re: Continuing revelation does not discredit existing revelation
anyone? Does his statement mean that Adam was God? Does it bring back all of the bizarre statements that previously had been trumped by living prophets? The Adam God Theory was never doctrine. It was merely a misinterpretation of a vision given to Brigham. Fo rit to be canonized it would have had t...
- Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:44 am
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: Continuing revelation does not discredit existing revelation
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1297
Re: Continuing revelation does not discredit existing revelation
Sorry, only comments that favor the content and/or church are allowed.JohnStuartMill wrote:My comment on the YouTube video wasn't approved by whoever approves them.