Search found 1910 matches
- Sun Oct 17, 2010 9:11 pm
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: Simon Belmont's Hatred For Infymus
- Replies: 82
- Views: 7145
Re: Simon Belmont's Hatred For Infymus
Is it OK for a person to use company time to do personal buisness without the boss's permission, it is really a simple question Simon? Your question is leading. It assumes that DCP did, in fact use company time to do personal business without the "boss's permission." What is your point? O...
- Sat Sep 11, 2010 1:19 pm
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: Doctor CamNC4Me: Prompting Kevin Smith & the Carla Ogden Fax
- Replies: 52
- Views: 4935
Re: Doctor CamNC4Me: Prompting Kevin Smith & the Carla Ogden Fax
Here’s where out interaction became interesting: In a rare moment of honesty, and I’m not sure if he was simply experiencing a ischemic stroke or not, he stated that he could have “misremembered” handling the 2nd Watson Letter when in reality what he thought was the 2nd Watson Letter was nothing mo...
- Sun Jul 25, 2010 6:12 pm
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: Channelling Shades
- Replies: 21
- Views: 2240
Re: Channelling Shades
Having moderators make responsible decisions is not the same as using a message board in a capricious manner in order to insure only certain viewpoints are heard. Really? I think today saw the composing of a list of those whose in real life identities are fair game. Wow, feels like a.Danite and del...
- Sun Jul 25, 2010 3:44 am
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: Channelling Shades
- Replies: 21
- Views: 2240
Re: Channelling Shades
Everyday it is beginning to look more and more like MAD moderation around here. Having moderators make responsible decisions is not the same as using a message board in a capricious manner in order to insure only certain viewpoints are heard. Really? I think today saw the composing of a list of tho...
- Sat Jul 24, 2010 6:59 pm
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: Channelling Shades
- Replies: 21
- Views: 2240
Re: Channelling Shades
Everyday it is beginning to look more and more like MAD moderation around here.
- Fri Jul 23, 2010 9:08 pm
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: Time to Vote on Rule #7
- Replies: 277
- Views: 12676
Re: Time to Vote on Rule #7
What about this scenario? Juliann doesn't post here, and I have no idea if she wants her in real life first and last name to be shown here. I highly doubt she would PM us to take it down. Yet another problem here, Scottie, is that to a certain extent you don't know what you're talking about. (No of...
- Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:17 pm
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: Daniel C. Peterson is DCP
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2035
Daniel C. Peterson is DCP
Just an FYI for any MAD lurkers who might not have been aware of this fact when reading Daniel C. "DCP" Peterson's old posts here or ongoing posts at MAD. Have a great day. =) --Oops, that's right, I dare not now write his name as he's registered here as just DCP. Now rather than just dele...
- Tue Jun 29, 2010 7:23 pm
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: What constitutes in real life information and what is the punishment?
- Replies: 199
- Views: 27297
Re: What constitutes in real life information and what is the punishment?
Just curious, which posters in this thread have their sights set on running for Congress, or the local PTA board?
- Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:19 pm
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: What constitutes in real life information and what is the punishment?
- Replies: 199
- Views: 27297
Re: What constitutes in real life information and what is the punishment?
As I was pondering this just now, I'm wondering if this might be blown up a bit more than it should. An incident doesn't necessarily reflect a pattern. Rules are typically implemented when a pattern is observed. Perhaps I've just missed them, but how many issues have we had? I can only think of the...
- Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:01 am
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: Anonymity
- Replies: 176
- Views: 8165
Re: Anonymity
asbestosman wrote:For some reason, this is how I heard your quote.Nimrod wrote:Begin down that road, and you know where your destination will be.
Sorry. I suppose it was the syntax.