Oh, just thought of another...
Fourth, Scott Grow--great, great guy.
So, for me, Big 15, 0 out of 2; 70s, 2 for 2, good guys.
Search found 399 matches
- Fri Apr 12, 2024 5:59 pm
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: Have you ever met a Mormon General Authority…
- Replies: 14
- Views: 534
- Fri Apr 12, 2024 5:42 pm
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: Have you ever met a Mormon General Authority…
- Replies: 14
- Views: 534
Re: Have you ever met a Mormon General Authority…
Three come to mind. One was that I took Trust Law from Dallin Oaks at BYU law school. Much better person then than what I've seen of him as an "Apostle." The other was Vaughn J. Featherstone. Just an average Joe. Obviously was not going to get elevated to the Big 15. Third was M. Russell Ballard, wh...
- Sun Mar 17, 2024 6:11 pm
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: Temple Sealings of Dead People who Were Married More than Once
- Replies: 55
- Views: 1546
Re: Temple Sealings of Dead People who Were Married More than Once
Bret Ripley wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2024 6:49 pmI'm not too far from you, and moss and algae have convinced me: entropy is green.
- Sun Mar 17, 2024 6:08 pm
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: Transgender
- Replies: 16
- Views: 559
Re: Transgender
yesDr. Shades wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2024 8:13 amI'm pretty sure you mean "circumcise," right?sock puppet wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2024 9:38 pmThe obstetrician when I was born made the decision--without consulting my parents--to circumscribe me.
- Tue Mar 12, 2024 4:30 pm
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: Temple Sealings of Dead People who Were Married More than Once
- Replies: 55
- Views: 1546
Re: Temple Sealings of Dead People who Were Married More than Once
Now I have a question too... If Jane and Joe were sealed in the temple in life but divorced in life and they both remarried, are they able to unseal and seal to new people? Yes. But they have to get First Presidency approval to annul the original temple sealings. I wonder how she does that since sh...
- Mon Mar 11, 2024 5:12 pm
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: Temple Sealings of Dead People who Were Married More than Once
- Replies: 55
- Views: 1546
Re: Temple Sealings of Dead People who Were Married More than Once
Suppose of Jane divorced Joe, Jane went on to marry James. Then Jane died, not sealed to either Joe or James. Does the LDS church in its temples seal Jane vicariously to both Joe and James so that she can pick in the hereafter?
- Sun Mar 10, 2024 4:26 pm
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: Temple Sealings of Dead People who Were Married More than Once
- Replies: 55
- Views: 1546
Re: Temple Sealings of Dead People that Were Married More than Once
In principle, (according to the handbook) a man can be sealed to more than woman, so long as only one wife is living. (A woman cannot be sealed to more than one man, ever). So it stands to reason that a deceased man can be vicariously sealed to all the women he was married to in life, providing the...
- Sat Mar 09, 2024 10:03 pm
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: SEN indulges in gossip and innuendo
- Replies: 27
- Views: 1043
Re: SEN indulges in gossip and innuendo
DCP really does read here assiduously!! Yesterday: I recounted an episode in yesterday’s blog entry that was described to me by Karl Ricks Anderson during a 2016 filming project in Kirtland, Ohio. It was about a reprimand given by the Spirit in the Kirtland Temple, according to the man himself, to ...
- Sat Mar 09, 2024 9:51 pm
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: Temple Sealings of Dead People who Were Married More than Once
- Replies: 55
- Views: 1546
Temple Sealings of Dead People who Were Married More than Once
Suppose Joe was first married to Jane, they divorced because Jane could not have children. Joe then married Jill, had three children and dies, never having been Mormon sealed to Jane or Jill. Does the LDS church do two sealings for dead Joe? One to Jane and then one to Jill so that Joe can have his ...
- Sat Mar 09, 2024 9:38 pm
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: Transgender
- Replies: 16
- Views: 559
Re: Transgender
Our manner of speaking emphasizes, in my view over-emphasizes, gender. "You're a good boy." Is he good just as a boy, or would he also qualify in the speaker's view as a good person too? Why not just say, "you're good"? Our speech habits and patterns categorize us by gender even when the sentence ha...