DiscussMormonism.com

So, still no response to the basic properties of numbers debunking your a'magic' claims. No surprise. And your celebration of earthquakes that destroy lives is as distasteful as ever. The Wicker Man requested a non-specific demonstration and the 5.7 magnitude earthquake landed Moroni’s instrument. ...

Correction: replace 7 with 12 in the last line. So, you see the pattern then. No magic. 4/7 = 57% as per many poll results. :lol: Sigh. Marcus is about as clever as a toilet lever. Whose to say a toilet lever ain’t clever. :P Bears repeating, as does the fact that the magnitude of the earthquake th...

Numeral Number Nine is indeed weird. (42/7) x 4 = 24 (No wonder 24 is a magic number, said the magical man.) ⚔️ Not weird, not magical. You just need to understand the properties of numbers. Do you need help with this set also? I'll give you a hint: 7×3 = 21, 4x3 = 12. 7x6 = 42, 4x6 = 24. 7x9 = 63,...

Marcus wrote: ↑

Mon May 13, 2024 2:40 am

drumdude wrote: ↑

Mon May 13, 2024 2:37 am

Wait til he discovers numbers can have other bases than just base 10.

The number of degrees in a single radian is baked into our creation because we use base 10.

I believe Astronomers believe this also: maybe not soon but in another 5 billion years when our sun flares into a red giant as it exhausts it's fuel; later fades into oblivion as a white dwarf a.k.a. in Mormon land as a pure dwarf and then into a black dwarf. No black dwarfs yet but that is where o...

Numeral Number Nine is indeed weird.

(42/7) x 4 = 24

(No wonder 24 is a magic number, said the magical man.)

Gadianton wrote: ↑

Sun May 12, 2024 11:19 pm

Then he said Numeral Number 9.

Numeral number 9 is 8.

Pray tell, How so.

Twice I wrote a reply and twice I lost what I wrote. Guess I'm not meant to lol. https://youtu.be/HSI1k6ath0E Spectral disturbance 38 minutes ago when this guy reported it. Then he said Numeral Number 9. (81/9) x 2 = 18. Another subset of a larger set that contains all numbers subject to digit reve...

Digit reversal from 72 into 27 is a new thing for me.

Divide by 8 and multiply by 3 in the one case discovered so far.

Can you find another member of this set.

(3:08) :mrgreen: (Three, but not Eight) you’re on a :roll: TTW (n-tuple type words) are like quatrains, only better. Once upon a time I requested about 2 dozen items from someone. Then supplied them with 3 six-foot polycarbonate cylinders. Each item being 8 inches in length actually allows for twen...