DiscussMormonism.com

I have not engaged in ad hominem, but you repeatedly resort to it. This is simply not true. You have characterized us as apologists, for starters---only to backtrack when pressed on it, and pretend you were criticizing the book, not the authors (a silly distinction). You have repeatedly insulted ou...

I never claimed expertise in Jungian psychology. You claimed that for me in your sarcastic remark. My argument, which you have yet to address, was about the weakness of the synchronicity and collective unconscious theories, and their misuse in historical discussions. Based on your comments thus far...

Why is Dan Vogel so against their views? Apparently it is insulting to even attempt to answer this question. Vogel, who is known in part for his psychbiographical work on Joseph Smith Jr., has declared it "ad hominem" to comment on the psychological implications of his dramatic, ad nauseam, reactio...

Did you read Nick's hostile and ad hominem comments? I will address the substantive comments next week, but it would be a waste of time. I can't review the book and debate at the same time. You already know what the authors think. It's my turn. The only comment I made that could be considered "host...

Bennett was initially proposed as secretary of Nauvoo Lodge. After his ouster, he spilled the beans on some of the irregularities of Nauvoo Lodge. I initially was prejudiced against him, but after research, it turned out that he was giving accurate reports.