DiscussMormonism.com

I am playing the game where the rules are: 1. I do not lie 2. I am sincere 3. I am authentic Yeah, just being yourself is a game because life is a game, it's a play. I am playing and so are you. I am being upfront with you about the fact that I am playing and I am telling you what my rules are. Rig...

I genuinely had not considered that perhaps they just had a birthday.

By all means, you're an optimist.

Building high shelves is a great way to pack away stuff not used often and make room for things more often used. For my highest shelves that require a ladder, where I put things used the very least that aren't excessively heavy, I began keeping an inventory file on my computer of what's up there. I ...

15 I know thy works , that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot. 16 So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth. Now you're wresting the scriptures to your own avail. I think you know darn well, Valo, that this passage isn't ...

Your second example: "A relationship between a 26-year old and a 17-year old is non-harmful, as long as it's consensual." If you change the format: "How can you think that a consensual relationship between a 26-year old and a 17-year is harmful?" It's easy to recognize as a 'complex question' fallac...

It's a catchy title for the series, I'll give them that.

God's acts aren't random. They are timed. But it's easy to dismiss everything. Really easy to just go on surviving because the world will go one with or without me and has been twirling around the sun for millions of years. Who am I? I've only been here a little and I've only said "You are making s...

That's BS, man. I wasn't engaging in circular reasoning. You seem to engage in confirmation bias. When I said, "There's no harm when a 26-year-old dates a 17-year-old, as long as the relationship is healthy and consensual," I was simply describing what I believe constitutes a non-harmful relationsh...

IWP wrote:There will be a reason. Perhaps an age?

It's possible, and I thank you for the hearty round of laughter. We would need clarification from Valo. Until then, I'm extending Valo the benefit of the doubt that Valo has more self-awareness than say, LeeUniverse/ldsfaqs.

Easy. The witnesses to the supposed "longer scroll" didn't describe any unique features that aren't in the papyrii that we still have. The only supposedly unique feature was that the scroll was "long." Now, "long" is an extremely subjective descriptor. As I remember it, and my memory is way worse t...