DiscussMormonism.com

doubtingthomas wrote: ↑

Mon Apr 15, 2024 12:11 am

However, how can people become interested when all the topics that I create are merged into one?

All your topics are the same topic.

Thank you, Brack. That was very helpful.

I can be bothered to read this board. Similar to how the burden of proof lies on he or she who makes the assertion, the opening poster has the responsibility to do the “heavy lifting” of providing background and context. This has always been so around here.

Philo Sofee wrote: ↑

Sun Apr 14, 2024 9:17 pm

Dr. Shades wrote: ↑

Sun Apr 14, 2024 4:46 pm

Judging by your reaction, it looks like you’re going to continue to allow ChatGPT to type your opening posts for you. Am I correct?

Yer a funny man sometimes Shades. Thanks for making my day!

Will you do this again? Yes or no?

honorentheos wrote: ↑

Sun Apr 14, 2024 9:33 pm

I have to question how an adult person in the US hadn't heard the story or at least the general headline? Seemed like it was in every feed and on every news program I saw.

I don't watch the news.

I think I'd like to visit Arizona. Apparently, it's 1846 there. How exciting. If anyone is curious (I doubt it, but on the off chance someone might wonder) why I've taken up the fight against religion after having abandoned it for so long, it's because all these unverified claims are the premise be...

Philo Sofee wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 12:42 pm

Dr. Shades wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 13, 2024 11:31 am

So, you're content with a computer program spoon-feeding the logic of arguments and evidence to you?

Judging by your reaction, it looks like you’re going to continue to allow ChatGPT to type your opening posts for you. Am I correct?

Philo Sofee wrote: ↑

Thu Apr 11, 2024 11:00 pm

Dr. Shades wrote: ↑

Thu Apr 11, 2024 5:08 pm

Because there’s literally no thought behind it.

It's not about thought, it's about analyzing the logic of arguments and evidence.

So, you're content with a computer program spoon-feeding the logic of arguments and evidence to you?

Philo Sofee wrote: ↑

Wed Apr 10, 2024 11:09 pm

Dr. Shades wrote: ↑

Wed Apr 10, 2024 2:29 pm

So, we’re taking A.I.-generated texts seriously enough to start threads on now?

Yes indeed. Why not?

Because there’s literally no thought behind it.

Kishkumen wrote: ↑

Wed Apr 10, 2024 9:56 pm

Criticism of historical figures is a practically irresistible pastime.

In your opinion, is it ever justified? If so, who?