DiscussMormonism.com

Sorenson was wrong. The Mathenys were correct; too bad they published their criticism in Metcalf's book. Sorenson's rejoinder in FARMS was, in my view, an embarrassment. Sorenson was better known in his professional capacity for his writings and encyclopedic publications on diffusionism. There is wh...

Just say the name Ptolemy I and have Shulem call into the show. The secular problem-solving committee that Elder BH Roberts convened to answer problems with the Book of Mormon would be a very interesting topic. I think that together, Kerry and Bob could help provide some unique insights. Yes, that ...

No Book of Abraham discussion. I've given up.

Kishkumen wrote: ↑

Sat Nov 20, 2021 8:58 pm

Yeah, I’m not sure I want to see you guys debate. I’d rather see a less adversarial discussion. Debates suck.

It would be just an interview.

Start with me. I'll debate you. You can pick the questions. Just don't make it about me which I know you won't.

I've read that the more conservative the bishop the more willing he is to spend with abandon.

I have been under psychiatric care. I don't like my doc much. One day I came to his office dressed in nothing but Saran Wrap. He said, "Oh Mr. Yahoo, I see your nuts."

I didn't believe in fund raising either.

Oh sure. Frickin moron. Go dialogue with Bill Reel/Atlantic Mike. Everybody here knows who I am in real life.

I don't think so. I think I was in the middle. I know there are pretty tough cheapo bishops, but there were none in my stake the years I served, and I know that because as Transient Bishop I could see what was going on. So, based on your say so ('l was in the middle'), at least half the lds bishops...

Moksha wrote: ↑

Fri Nov 19, 2021 12:57 pm

What's with Cardon's failure to grasp the meaning of a strawman argument? Perhaps as his friend, Bought Yahoo could explain it to him.

Cardon needs to change things up. Sure, you're losing your hair, but ditch the cap and own it.