Search found 5478 matches

by _Mister Scratch
Fri Nov 10, 2006 1:27 am
Forum: Terrestrial Forum
Topic: Mr. Scratch's Guide to FAIR
Replies: 197
Views: 75525

What makes you think I don't like Pahoran? Do you assume this, simply because he doesn't like me? My main problem is with his behavior: his tendency to berate people, and talk down to them, and to dismiss their thoughts and feelings as being simply "vile anti-Mormonism." It is his condesce...
by _Mister Scratch
Fri Nov 10, 2006 1:21 am
Forum: Terrestrial Forum
Topic: A question for the forum
Replies: 23
Views: 15203

Difficult to say, and I wish I knew the full context of the story. I.e., Did Talmage tell the other Christians that they were "vile" and "brazen liars" and did he call them to repentance? I don't know, Pah. I feel like I need more information. If they were simply doing this to hi...
by _Mister Scratch
Fri Nov 10, 2006 12:46 am
Forum: Terrestrial Forum
Topic: Mr. Scratch's Guide to FAIR
Replies: 197
Views: 75525

Re: Corrections

Look up the word "subvert," Brother _____. Perhaps you should direct your comment to Pahoran if that is who you meant to address. I see nobody with the name of _____ on this board. Quote: By the way: Are you the author of "The Anti-Mormon Attackers"? This is the third time I've ...
by _Mister Scratch
Fri Nov 10, 2006 12:14 am
Forum: Terrestrial Forum
Topic: Mr. Scratch's Guide to FAIR
Replies: 197
Views: 75525

Re: Corrections

I am not aware that Ol' Scratch--to give the devil his due, as it were--however bitterly he resents being banned from FAIR, and however viciously he festers over it, has ever actually tried to post as a sock-puppet. Although I am aware that he has tried various and devious tricks to log on using sp...
by _Mister Scratch
Fri Nov 10, 2006 12:05 am
Forum: Terrestrial Forum
Topic: _____'s "The Anti-Mormon Attackers"
Replies: 42
Views: 25302

Re: _____'s "The Anti-Mormon Attackers"

wenglund wrote:No mirror. You are proving my point all on your self-discrediting own.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-


Hey, isn't this what Kevin told you over on MTT, Wade? Can't you come up with any original barbs or observations on your own?
by _Mister Scratch
Fri Nov 10, 2006 12:00 am
Forum: Terrestrial Forum
Topic: Daniel C. Peterson: well-respected scholar? or not?
Replies: 127
Views: 54350

What this demonstrates is that I am absolutely right about Pahoran in my characterization of him on the blog: he is kept around on FAIR primarily so that he can function as an "attack dog." And you are here to function as what? A rabid hyena? Regards, Pahoran No, my dear Pah! As I have sa...
by _Mister Scratch
Thu Nov 09, 2006 6:01 pm
Forum: Terrestrial Forum
Topic: Daniel C. Peterson: well-respected scholar? or not?
Replies: 127
Views: 54350

What this demonstrates is that I am absolutely right about Pahoran in my characterization of him on the blog: he is kept around on FAIR primarily so that he can function as an "attack dog." And you are here to function as what? A rabid hyena? Regards, Pahoran No, my dear Pah! As I have sa...
by _Mister Scratch
Thu Nov 09, 2006 5:58 pm
Forum: Terrestrial Forum
Topic: Mr. Scratch's Guide to FAIR
Replies: 197
Views: 75525

Re: Corrections

Professor Peterson likes to portray himself as a jovial saint, but he is no stranger to trash-talking (such as calling Tal Bachman "Tal Tales,"), being foul-mouthed (such as referring to Kevin Graham as a "jackass") Jackass is foul? Puhleeze. In Disney's Pinocchio (rated G), Jim...
by _Mister Scratch
Thu Nov 09, 2006 5:55 pm
Forum: Terrestrial Forum
Topic: Mr. Scratch's Guide to FAIR
Replies: 197
Views: 75525

Re: Corrections

Also, you said elsewhere that he is your "friend." I say: Prove it. I've never seen him give any indication whatsoever that he views you as a "friend." Instead, I interpret his remarks towards you to mean that he sees you as an obnoxious, obsequious leech who's trying to ride ar...
by _Mister Scratch
Thu Nov 09, 2006 5:16 am
Forum: Terrestrial Forum
Topic: Mr. Scratch's Guide to FAIR
Replies: 197
Views: 75525

Re: Corrections

Okay Snaga, so according to you, we are supposed to believe the following chain of events took place: 1) Dan invents a completely bogus post, right out of whole cloth, and attributes it to you. 2) Dan then publicly apologises to you for misrepresenting you. 3) You then post on RfM and identify your...