DiscussMormonism.com

Wait a tic. Wouldn't Faust's 1976 talk be official doctrine while McConkie's BYU speech isn't? o_O Dwight, Faust was just a lowly Seventy in 1976 (not getting the nod to be an Apostle until 10/1/1978). So obviously BRM, an apostle in 1982, trumped Faust. Yeah, but wouldn't something printed in the ...

CaliforniaKid wrote:I'm certain you have found your way to the wrong forum. Try mormondialogue.org instead.

Boo! Hiss!

If you really want to know the answer to this relatively insignificant aspect of Mormon revisionism, Brother Faust (a truly kind and gentle man) gave the first talk in 1976 and the second talk in 1999. It is what happened in between that made all the difference. It is called Elder Bruce R. McConkie...

I guess they don't have the option to split threads, so their solution is to just close threads entirely. Look on the bright side: If you want to get someone else's thread closed, you have the option of doing what Obiwan did. In other words, you now know that you, too, can play at that game. (The n...

Prussian Blue!

"We have not seen the DVD but it appears it does not accurately reflect the doctrines of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints."

Hmmm. *scratches head*

I liked Blair Hodges/LifeOnaPlate's "Stillborn" title for his review of Shawn McCraney's "Born Again Mormon". So mean and funny! I love it!

emilysmith wrote:

This one got me. Bahahahahaha

Nicely done.