DiscussMormonism.com

Sexual orientation is irrelevant, WaterDog, and the rest of your comments are equally inappropriate. Take your nonsense elsewhere. Science disagrees. You are, of course, free to offer a competing hypothesis to explain Smoot's behavior. m ...an ego-dystonic mental disorder characterized by having a ...

:eek: What the HELL is WRONG with this guy? Does he think this is funny? Easy. And I don't know why the people around here are so squeamish about saying it. Stephen Smoot is a homosexual. He is a gay Mormon man. I'm sorry, he is a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints who also s...

Seems someone logged into their LDS org (or whatever the current domain name is) account and was prompted to participate in this survey. Doesn't in of itself mean it will go anywhere. From the results they may swiftly decide to go nowhere near this idea in practice. But, the fact that they're conduc...

WaterDog: All of that may be true in theory, but when the rubber meets the road, this guy is making the world a better place than it otherwise would've been had he not become the bishop, . . . right? No. That's exactly the point. No, he is not. Is the world better off with, or without, the Third Re...

in my opinion this man is doing the wrong thing. Let's break it down. That's nice that he's finding "good" things to do for people, golf clapp, and insodoing he's providing these people with emotional/bonding type experiences that will strengthen their relationship with the church and set ...

I think it is worth taking a moment to remind everybody of the context of Stephen Smoot's behavior. He is a self loathing gay man trying to survive and feel human connection and acceptance in a culture that despises him. He is frustrated and angry. To go on, to subdue and numb the pain of his existe...

Haven't watched the video. Is there anything new here, or is this just a rehash of the same Nahom stuff that was already debunked a year or so ago?

I have great respect for most on this board. Assuming for the sake of argument Norton was justified in speaking to McKenna as he did on the phone call, do you think he was similarly justified in publishing it for thousands to hear? Was the shaming too much? Did it amount to bullying? And what do yo...

I have never been McKenna's attorney nor done anything to give any reasonable person the impression that I am. McKenna has had Craig Vernon as her attorney since before I first spoke with her. I have commented on the facts of her case, interviewed her on my podcast, and made public disclosure reque...

consiglieri wrote:The reporting is wrong.

Or at least your interpretation of the reporting is.

What is the correct interpretation?