DiscussMormonism.com

Res Ipsa wrote: ↑

Mon Mar 18, 2024 11:27 pm

Rivendale wrote: ↑

Mon Mar 18, 2024 9:56 pm

You probably don't want to know BIDWFT, or MFMC

I had to look that first one up, but guessed the second.

The arson cases cast a shadow on one of those acronyms.

huckelberry wrote: ↑

Mon Mar 18, 2024 9:13 pm

Res Ipsa wrote: ↑

Mon Mar 18, 2024 9:09 pm

This So-Called Church.

oh, ok , thanks

You probably don't want to know BIDWFT, or MFMC

Ah that makes sense. I have him on Facebook and it seems like he is pretty well done, but those interviews being from 2018 would explain a lot. I have him on Facebook also. In fact I use one of his quotes often. What do you call an organization that has to tell its members every six months to stay ...

The pod cast is a edited re-run from the 2018 series. I believe John is combining 7 or 8 episodes into 3. David is a good person for sure, brilliant mind. In the 1st interview, in my opinion, he is all over the place. He had just stopped attending church but still has a great love for it. Again in ...

Extraordinary claims require Extraordinary evidence. Someone seeing someone at a party or a person having a pulse is not extraordinary. This is simply Sagan's dragon in a garage from Demon Haunted World. Subjective internal proof can be used to justify Roland the closet goblin, alien abductions and ...

In 2020, Max Baker-Hytch published a piece in Solas Articles, titled A Beginner’s Guide to the Fine-Tuning Argument. Here's the full reference: A Beginner’s Guide to the Fine-Tuning Argument Author Max Baker-Hytch Date Published 24th February 2020 https://www.solas-cpc.org/a-beginners-guide-to-the-...

In keeping with the title and intent of the thread I looked for gemli's next comment to post, but he hasn't added anything recently, so I looked back a little to see his earlier thoughts on stories. This one adds only the slightest bit of argument, but on the other hand it does seem to indicate his...

Straight from Sic et Non today and keeping with the theme of this thread we seem to go straight back to stories. Not only that, Peterson is saying that “stories” is the best they’ve got. Here is something that puzzles me. Why do believers shy away from the things God commands? Mormon god commands t...

Straight from Sic et Non today and keeping with the theme of this thread we seem to go straight back to stories.

For example, I think that the witnesses are our strongest point of offense. I simply see no way around the implications of their testimony, though some have tried to get around it.

Lawyers do that all the time. We call it attacking the credibility of the witness. The message to the jury is: the story you are being told isn't true. How, in the case where a ballistics expert is showing that the rifling pattern on the bullet that killed the victim matches the rifling pattern on ...