Search found 94 matches
- Mon Aug 08, 2011 2:36 am
- Forum: Celestial Forum
- Topic: How are the Kinderhook Plates a secular translation?
- Replies: 68
- Views: 5722
Re: How are the Kinderhook Plates a secular translation?
To be honest, I would disagree with most of that. However, I realize that this is basically now a debate over the meaning of the word "revelatory," which is fundamentally undecidable, and therefore not very enlightening. The claim, or assumption, has been that Joseph Smith translated from...
- Mon Aug 08, 2011 2:31 am
- Forum: Celestial Forum
- Topic: Don Bradley's Kinderhook Bomb
- Replies: 321
- Views: 84691
Re: Don Bradley’s Kinderhook Bomb
Equality, Chris Smith has given an honest and accurate summary of the critical based on the KP and how this affects it on the "secular translation" thread: The traditional "anti-Mormon" objection to the KP incident has been that if Joseph translated a portion of the KP by revela...
- Sun Aug 07, 2011 10:08 pm
- Forum: Celestial Forum
- Topic: Similar symbols on the Kinderhook Plates & GAEL
- Replies: 5
- Views: 838
Re: Similar symbols on the Kinderhook Plates & GAEL
Is it correct that Don's "bull's eye" (the character on the KP also being found among the KEP) requires that the elements of the KP character have to be deconstructed from the assembly in which they appear on the KP as a character, in order for the 'match' to be made? How distinctive are t...
- Sun Aug 07, 2011 10:03 pm
- Forum: Celestial Forum
- Topic: Don Bradley's Kinderhook Bomb
- Replies: 321
- Views: 84691
Re: Don Bradley’s Kinderhook Bomb
Does Don's thesis suppose that the GAEL was not inspired by God and was an 'off the plan' endeavor to which Joseph Smith, Jr. and his scribes spent countless hours while living off of the contributions of hard labouring Saints?
- Sun Aug 07, 2011 10:01 pm
- Forum: Celestial Forum
- Topic: Don Bradley's Kinderhook Bomb
- Replies: 321
- Views: 84691
Re: Don Bradley’s Kinderhook Bomb
Are the apologists at FAIR and NMI now in day three of wiping the egg off of their face for having for years doubted even disparaged Clayton and the accuracy of his journal entry, Clayton a confidante and scribe trusted by Joseph Smith, Jr.? Is the silence by those apologists as thundering and deafe...
- Sun Aug 07, 2011 1:04 am
- Forum: Celestial Forum
- Topic: Don Bradley's Kinderhook Bomb
- Replies: 321
- Views: 84691
Re: Don Bradley’s Kinderhook Bomb
Simon Belmont wrote:Analytics: why did you refer to it as a "bomb?" Are you trying to be a jerk?
Was Don Bradley's theory and presentation a complete demolition of the critical arguments? That was the advance boast, wasn't it?
- Sat Aug 06, 2011 1:12 am
- Forum: Celestial Forum
- Topic: Don Bradley's Kinderhook Bomb
- Replies: 321
- Views: 84691
Re: Don Bradley’s Kinderhook Bomb
Morley wrote:Socrates wrote:
_________________
My favorite game show is Jeopardy! "Alex, I'll take Theology for $800."
If your name is Socrates, shouldn't your signature line be a question?
Have you considered what the second thing that would follow after my signature line quote would be?
- Fri Aug 05, 2011 11:21 pm
- Forum: Celestial Forum
- Topic: Don Bradley's Kinderhook Bomb
- Replies: 321
- Views: 84691
Re: Don Bradley’s Kinderhook Bomb
RockSlider wrote:How many characters are on the kinderhook plates?
What character in the GAEL translates as an identification of a great Nephi warrior that descended from Ham? What part of the Book of Abraham talks about a great Nephi warrior descended from Ham?
- Fri Aug 05, 2011 11:10 pm
- Forum: Celestial Forum
- Topic: Don Bradley's Kinderhook Bomb
- Replies: 321
- Views: 84691
Re: Don Bradley’s Kinderhook Bomb
Apparently, Don discovered that a symbol on the Kinderhook plates matched a symbol that was on the Grammar and Alphabet of the Egyptian Language (GAEL) documents that Joseph Smith and/or his cohorts had produced. Wait, how did a symbol from the GAEL get on the Kinderhook Plates? Or did a symbol fro...
- Fri Jul 29, 2011 3:58 pm
- Forum: Terrestrial Forum
- Topic: Why I lost my virginity
- Replies: 84
- Views: 5350
Re: Why I lost my virginity
Dr. Peterson, does "soaking" (coitus interruptus) carry a different sin denotation (and punishment) in Mormon theology/penitence than if there was ejaculation by the male while in the vagina? Once there is penetration of the vagina, that is enough for coitus for rape. Is it different for M...