DiscussMormonism.com

I LOVED everyone of these! Thanks everyone for helping make my Christmas season cheerier!

Alphus & OMEGUS What he considers the "strongest" Mormon argument is really just an example of his own will to believe, or less charitably, his own religious delusions. It's not proof of anything. I will genially disagree with you. This proves that even very intelligent people can be and today are ...

Informant wrote: ↑

Fri Dec 09, 2022 3:39 am

Oh, sorry. I meant successfully refuted.

Pfft. Word games? I expected better.

Irrelevant ad hominem , the task is find someone who has refuted Anderson, I have two witnesses demonstrating Anderson's book on the witnesses is flawed, and wrong. That is what was asked for, that is exactly what I have given. STICK WITH THE ISSUE. Tsk tsk, how dare you use red! What specifically ...

https://imgur.com/yCu1BKb
Aw man, why didn't it just post it here?

bill4long wrote: ↑

Fri Dec 09, 2022 12:39 am

The Witnesses lost me at the whole "no blood transfusions to save a life" thing.

(Enjoying a blood-dripping rare Ribeye. Yowza!)

I will see your Anderson and raise you a Vogel and an Anderson. 1. Dan Vogel, "The Validity of the Witnesses," in Dan Vogel & Brent Lee Metcalfe, Editors, American Apocrypha, Signature Books, 2002; Chapter 4. 2. Rodger I Anderson, Joseph Smith's New York Reputation Re-Examined , Signature Books, 19...

The place one is supposed to study the witnesses is at Church, in seminary and institute. Lot's have people have been through those courses and found the witnesses claims unbelievable. Dan is criticising the Church for not doing a good enough teaching job on members. Has he volunteered his services...

Makes him look like a polygamist. Yeah, the Wiki entry is not all that good, and it's not Gary's fault.