DiscussMormonism.com

Shulem, could you post some enlarged images of those doodlings so everyone knows exactly what you are talking about? Behold, the doodles upon the paper backing of the temple of God: Who drew them and when? https://i.ibb.co/kHHLmr0/facsimile-1-peeling.jpg I don't know who did it, but I suspect that ...

Dan, Do you have an opinion of when the doodling on the paper backing of the original papyrus vignette of Facsimile No. 1 was drawn and who drew it? I'm now convinced that it happened in Nauvoo. Is there reason to believe otherwise? I've been discussing this in the Shout Out to Shulem! thread. I've...

Dan I will definitely read your new book- i applaud you for being the most thorough historian on things Mormon! Can you tell us who the "bad "guys are in your book so we can await a hit piece on you from Interpreter? k I don't think Gee and Muhlestein will like my book, because I go after their rev...

Then you have seriously dropped the ball. I can't begin to say how disappointed I am. :? I'm mostly interested in historical issues surrounding Joseph Smith's production of the text, particularly its chronology. Understanding the documents and the order of events destroys Nibley/Gee/Muhlestein reve...

Does your new book examine the evidences that Anubis (a god of Egypt) is missing his snout in Facsimile No. 3 and that the lead plate (not woodcut) shows that an original snout was scraped out and the person was reformed to suit Smith's revelation of a slave? Ugh, that was a big question. What's th...

The cover of my newest book going to press later this week. The back cover has three endorsements by Susan Staker, independent scholar, John Christopher Thomas, director, Center for Pentecostal and Charismatic Studies, Bangor University, and Brian Hauglid, professor emeritus of ancient scripture, Br...

I had an exchange with Barker on Facebook when I announced my upcoming book on Abraham apologetics. He snidely said my book will have trouble with his new argument presented at FAIR. So I responded: Tim Barker I read the first part of your paper that attempts to respond to Tanner and Heward's early ...