DiscussMormonism.com

I win. Game over, tapere. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norway

It's May 17th!!! Hooo-ra!!!!

1

If you would, name one (1) bit of evidence in favor of your assertion. I have been around boards for way too long to deal with the "show me just one" gambit. I wrote a book dealing with the evidence. How do you think I should condense all of that to just one thing? This is why I clarified...

BG,

If you would, name one (1) bit of evidence in favor of your assertion.

So you really claim to know, even after asserting (let's use that word to death) that no one know? That makes no sense. Your assertions (that is funner the more I use it) are based on you knowing how it was done, or something fundamental about the process. You take this assertion (yes, again) and u...

1. No one knows how the translation works.
2. There are errors in the text.
3. Brandt knows how the translation works.

QED

Then why do you claim to? I admit the hubris. It is an interesting and important question and deserves better answers than those that are built solely on assumptions. So you really claim to know, even after asserting (let's use that word to death) that no one know? That makes no sense. Your asserti...

But we DON'T have any goddamn clue about how the process works. That's how we know it was done in the way BG is showing us. (what with all the data and junk)

Is there any evidence from Smith's intimate circle of early helpers that he ever purported to do anything else but a divinely defined tight translation? Your question is too specific for a simple answer. The rather obvious fact, after examining as much evidence as I could find, was that no one real...