Markk wrote: ↑Fri Apr 15, 2022 1:52 am
Pakes wrote…Nonsensical non-answer. You’re doing, “We have to investigate, but Trump didn’t have to investigate!!” all over again, which is clearly confused and contradictory. So, this first question remains unanswered.
LOL Says who? It is an answer and a real answer, it is just not the answer you are some how trying to choreograph. If you have a better answer, please present it
No, its a crappy answer, and its not my responsibility to fix your crappy answer for you. Not only that, but it's based off a senseless assertion that you made, which you apparently cannot explain.
But, if you insist on holding the line on this one, then I would say that your non-response can be flipped right back on to you. As in,
Markk: We should investigate the Bidens..!!
canpakes: No, because we don't have to.
See?
We're done with the subject. No need to investigate.
Nonsensical non-answer again. Which government? The US government? From which aid and what dollar amounts? What did Burisma receive that was part of the US aid efforts? All of these finer questions remain unanswered by you, so this second question remains unanswered on the whole.
The Ukrainian Government, please pay attention. MZ was a energy minister and basically gave permits and leases ( what ever the proses is there) to his own company. He is hiding in Morocco or Cypress because the Government is after him. I have no idea how much…we know that Billions went missing though…and being that we gave billions to a corrupt government, from the president on down, and that MZ was in and out of that government and a oligarch of “high standings,” and again he is wanted by the new government administration….
My answer is a very good answer to a very ignorant and uneducated question.
Nope. Your answer reveals that you have
an accusation about
MZ corruptly obtaining money from the Ukranian Government.
That's all.
It says
nothing about what any investigation by the Ukranian Government concluded.
It gives
no details or information on whether or not any illegally-obtained monies were ever tied to any aid that the Ukranian Government received from the US.
It gives
no details or information on any connection between US aid and the Bidens, and does
not even begin to support any corruption claims re: the Bidens.
In short, my rejection of your first answer - as nonsensical - forces you to abandon your previously vague wording, and to now spin up into distractions about
MZ that do nothing for your claims against anyone else.
I’ll assume that you’re trying to say that earning a million (or more) in BoD salary would be the threshold of ‘overpaid’. Given that Hunter Biden wasn’t paid that much per year, I’ll assume that you believe that he was not overpaid.
LOL I am saying that a million dollars is a lot of money…and it is more (Rosemont) if you consider Archer also got a million a year that we know of. Can you tell me what they actually did and accomplished for that 2 million? They I believe attended two board meeting a year (never in the Ukraine). Hunter as far as i know helped hire a legal team from the US to help MZ in his defense for his criminal accusations against him…That is all I know they did. Again answer my question…what did he do as a sitting board member?
Well, Hunter Biden didn't meet your threshold for overpaid as he wasn't paid $1M USD by Burisma. So, why are you still saying that he was? And why are you asking me what he did for Burisma? Don't make me ask you to justify this distraction with
how 'x' level of salary supposedly indicates fraud, because you
won't be able to do
that, either.
This is a strange paragraph that doesn’t address my question of, “how ‘overpaid’ then automatically translates into ‘corrupt’”. As such, you’ve provided no answer to this last question.
You’ve answered 1 question out of 4, and your single answer works against your argument.
It is not strange…I am asking you to back up your question. What did Hunter actually accomplish at Burisma? I have answer you question, again just not th e answer you want and somehow you think you need ( I guess).
'Back up (my) question"..? Are you forgetting how this works?
Here's how you must be imagining this should go:
Markk: Hunter Biden was overpaid in my opinion, which proves that he's corrupt ..!!1!
canpakes: Why?
Markk: Back up your question, 'pakes!!
I think that
you need to back
your statement up. That's what
my question is asking. If you want me to 'back up'
my question, then I'll do so by stating that your assertion is a wild-eyed, unsubstantiated claim that can be made against hundreds of board members across America.
Happy, now? : D
By the way, I’m still interested in knowing why these geniuses of money laundering and corruption were bickering over a monthly cellphone bill of $190. Where’s the money, Markk?
That is weak and showing you are not paying attention…it is about a pattern and not just one bill? The president of Rosemont was paying the bills of Joe Biden. Hunter and Archer owned Rosemont…so again this is just more muck the leads to our president. If you want to, or maybe more correctly put “need to” dismiss these patterns I understand, I really do….I was LDS for 34 years, I understand how denial and being afraid to explore beyond ones comfort zone works.
Not that it matters if Hunter Biden bought JB a hamburger with money stolen from a
homeless underage minority orphan ... because
not even that would implicate
JB in or for anything. And 'paying bills', like a $190 phone bill, just doesn't do anything to support your claim that JB was shaking down the Ukranian Government ...
in order to pay his Verizon bill?
I can't even type this without giggling. : D