Is hell enough as punishment?

[_Themis]

kinda slow aren't ya?

At least not as slow as you. You started by saying he didn't provide any evidence and now admit he did after I showed you he did.

[_subgenius]

kinda slow aren't ya?

At least not as slow as you. You started by saying he didn't provide any evidence and now admit he did after I showed you he did.

yep...even slower than i suspected
....maybe you should go back over the thread....
and then,

slowly,


ask yourself why i would be accusing TEA of not providing evidence...especially when on countless other threads i have endorsed evidence via witness, testimony, writings, etc..
Then slowly ask yourself how ironic it is that TEA maintains the "cuz i say so" measure for the truth only on one side of the street.

now re-read this post...again......but...

s l o w l y

[_Tobin]

At least not as slow as you. You started by saying he didn't provide any evidence and now admit he did after I showed you he did.

yep...even slower than i suspected
....maybe you should go back over the thread....
and then,

slowly,


ask yourself why i would be accusing TEA of not providing evidence...especially when on countless other threads i have endorsed evidence via witness, testimony, writings, etc..
Then slowly ask yourself how ironic it is that TEA maintains the "cuz i say so" measure for the truth only on one side of the street.

now re-read this post...again......but...

s l o w l y

I don't think you'll ever get Themis to comprehend your argument, let alone engage it. Maybe you should ask him to respond with what he believes your argument to be? That usually is the problem on this forum with most of the critics here.

[_Themis]

yep...even slower than i suspected
....maybe you should go back over the thread....
and then,

slowly,


ask yourself why i would be accusing TEA of not providing evidence...especially when on countless other threads i have endorsed evidence via witness, testimony, writings, etc..
Then slowly ask yourself how ironic it is that TEA maintains the "cuz i say so" measure for the truth only on one side of the street.

now re-read this post...again......but...

s l o w l y

You really are not very smart. You could at least go back and read what you said. You stated in more then one post he provided no evdience.

you claim you thought up a number...you have offered no evidence to support that claim

This was even after he explained his witness is evidence. I explained the same thing to you as well. You admit it is evidence now, but you didn't then. You are the one being dishonest as you usually are.

[_Themis]

I don't think you'll ever get Themis to comprehend your argument, let alone engage it. Maybe you should ask him to respond with what he believes your argument to be? That usually is the problem on this forum with most of the critics here.

Here come our little cheer leader hypocrite who cannot take his own advice he likes to tell everyone else to do.

[_subgenius]

You really are not very smart. You could at least go back and read what you said. You stated in more then one post he provided no evdience.

you claim you thought up a number...you have offered no evidence to support that claim

i swear i am typing as slow as i can this time.
read the thread - s l o w l y - and see if you can discern why i was so emphatic in stating such....because you obviously did not read the previous post.

This was even after he explained his witness is evidence. I explained the same thing to you as well. You admit it is evidence now, but you didn't then. You are the one being dishonest as you usually are.

believe it or not, i am still rooting for you on this one

[_The Erotic Apologist]

One aspect differentiating the Bible from other religious, historical or inspirational works is this: throughout the Bible, future events are predicted with verifiable accuracy. If the Bible predicted the future to the extent that it cannot be dismissed as mere coincidence, then the source of this book can only be an omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient God who chose to speak his word through individuals for his purposes and design.

The first Harry Potter book predicts that only Harry will be able to defeat Lord Voldemort.

The fact that Harry defeats Lord Voldemort in the final Harry Potter book means the Harry Potter books are true.

(This message was paid for by REPUBLICANS FOR LORD VOLDEMORT).

[_LittleNipper]

One aspect differentiating the Bible from other religious, historical or inspirational works is this: throughout the Bible, future events are predicted with verifiable accuracy. If the Bible predicted the future to the extent that it cannot be dismissed as mere coincidence, then the source of this book can only be an omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient God who chose to speak his word through individuals for his purposes and design.

The first Harry Potter book predicts that only Harry will be able to defeat Lord Voldemort.

The fact that Harry defeats Lord Voldemort in the final Harry Potter book means the Harry Potter books are true.

(This message was paid for by REPUBLICANS FOR LORD VOLDEMORT).

The Bible was written by more than one author over periods of millennia . And the characters & places are all real.

[_Themis]

i swear i am typing as slow as i can this time.
read the thread - s l o w l y - and see if you can discern why i was so emphatic in stating such....because you obviously did not read the previous post.

I sometimes wonder if you are a complete Moron. You got caught. I already posted you stating it wasn't evidence to your post where you quote TEA saying his testimony is evidence. You know you cannot refute your own stupidly in not going over what you said, so all you have left is your substance-less rants. Maybe you should consider growing up a little.

[_ludwigm]

The Bible was written by more than one author over periods of millennia . And the characters & places are all real.

Numbers 22:28. And the LORD opened the mouth of the ass, and she said unto Balaam, What have I done unto thee, that thou hast smitten me these three times?
29. And Balaam said unto the ass, Because thou hast mocked me: I would there were a sword in mine hand, for now would I kill thee.
30. And the ass said unto Balaam, Am not I thine ass, upon which thou hast ridden ever since I was thine unto this day? was I ever wont to do so unto thee? And he said, Nay.