My Favorite (to date) take down of Creationism.

The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.
Post Reply
_Gunnar
_Emeritus
Posts: 6315
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 6:17 am

Re: My Favorite (to date) take down of Creationism.

Post by _Gunnar »

spotlight wrote:
LittleNipper wrote:God's intent is to return creation back to the Garden sealed for all eternity.


Will the animals have to give up any homosexual practices to return to the garden?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYdcvRe7ox8

LittleNipper probably thinks that everyone, whether animal or human, would have to give up sexual practices of any kind, whether heterosexual or homosexual to return to the garden.
No precept or claim is more likely to be false than one that can only be supported by invoking the claim of Divine authority for it--no matter who or what claims such authority.

“If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; but if you really make them think, they'll hate you.”
― Harlan Ellison
_LittleNipper
_Emeritus
Posts: 4518
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:49 pm

Re: My Favorite (to date) take down of Creationism.

Post by _LittleNipper »

spotlight wrote:
LittleNipper wrote:God's intent is to return creation back to the Garden sealed for all eternity.


Will the animals have to give up any homosexual practices to return to the garden?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYdcvRe7ox8


Homosexuality is a dysfunction. I believe that there may not be any sexuality in eternity. There will be no longer any need to procreate. The Bible clearly indicate that there will be no homosexuals in heaven. I believe all sins are forgiven by God through Christ Jesus. My understanding is that there will be no sexual desires in heaven. The person who loves the Lord doesn't care. The individual lusting self-satisfaction will.
_ludwigm
_Emeritus
Posts: 10158
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:07 am

Re: My Favorite (to date) take down of Creationism.

Post by _ludwigm »

LittleNipper wrote:My understanding is that there will be no sexual desires in heaven.

At least muslims get 70 (77?) virgins.

Change your god...
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei
_The CCC
_Emeritus
Posts: 6746
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2015 4:51 am

Re: My Favorite (to date) take down of Creationism.

Post by _The CCC »

LittleNipper.

So sex is only useful because its utilitarian in only one way? What a myopic view of what a loving giving relationship is.
_just me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9070
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:46 pm

Re: My Favorite (to date) take down of Creationism.

Post by _just me »

This is ridiculous. Life on earth could not have even started without death. Birth and death are linked and define life.

The whole life cycle depends on death and decay and it is truly bizarre that some people believe it could ever be otherwise.
~Those who benefit from the status quo always attribute inequities to the choices of the underdog.~Ann Crittenden
~The Goddess is not separate from the world-She is the world and all things in it.~
_just me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9070
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:46 pm

Re: My Favorite (to date) take down of Creationism.

Post by _just me »

I also love that God gave Adam a bellybutton (which is a scar from umbilical cord) because he knew that human reproduction would cause that scar. Yet, Nipper isn't sure that God knew his creation was going to reproduce?

Did Adam have hair and nails? Did he slough dead skin cells or no?
~Those who benefit from the status quo always attribute inequities to the choices of the underdog.~Ann Crittenden
~The Goddess is not separate from the world-She is the world and all things in it.~
_DrW
_Emeritus
Posts: 7222
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 2:57 am

Re: My Favorite (to date) take down of Creationism.

Post by _DrW »

ludwigm wrote:
SteelHead wrote:God playing the role of the deceiver. Then satan is god?

- Image -
David Hume: "---Mistakes in philosophy are merely ridiculous, those in religion are dangerous."

DrW: "Mistakes in science are learning opportunities and are eventually corrected."
_Franktalk
_Emeritus
Posts: 2689
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 1:28 am

Re: My Favorite (to date) take down of Creationism.

Post by _Franktalk »

huckelberry wrote:
To think that there was death before Adam does create a pressure to rethink a few traditional assumptions.
On the other hand it is hard to think of something about history which is more sure than that there was death long long long before Adam and Eve.


All life on this planet gets stuck within a paradigm at some point. To allow progress death of the mortal body must happen. It is like a reset button so the next life grows up in a new culture. And the hope is that over time knowledge and culture will improve. So whether you believe as I do that life forms were seeded onto the earth or if you think evolution did it, both require death to progress.

Now when you overlay the scriptures on top of what we see around us it becomes real confusing. Something inside of us tells us that the scriptures are special. But they are not easy to interpret. They are mixed with so much that is false. But if we were sent here to experience opposition then a perfect stage is set. We have science that looks at the world without the words of the prophets. Then we have thousands of interpretations of the scriptures. A whole range of beliefs for us to choose. And of course we do.

At some point we will obtain a critical mass of knowledge and we will cast off our current systems which supply our beliefs. The first to go will be religion. It will be replaced with a better view of reality. Science in its current form will have to go as well. In time man will become aware that there is much more going on than the senses can give us. It would be nice to think that both science and religion are heading towards truth. They may be in a small part but both will refuse to change when they should.

Science with its limited view believes that man is at the pinnacle on its path. That somehow natural selection has honed the human body into near perfection. I on the other hand see this body as flesh 101 soon to be replaced with a more advanced model.
_LittleNipper
_Emeritus
Posts: 4518
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:49 pm

Re: My Favorite (to date) take down of Creationism.

Post by _LittleNipper »

just me wrote:I also love that God gave Adam a bellybutton (which is a scar from umbilical cord) because he knew that human reproduction would cause that scar. Yet, Nipper isn't sure that God knew his creation was going to reproduce?

Did Adam have hair and nails? Did he slough dead skin cells or no?


God knew that man would reproduce. God commanded reproduction. The issue is that babies were not conceived until after the Fall. Angels were not meant to procreate and man was created a little lower than the angels. So while humans are mortal, they can reproduce; however, after the end of this life, humans put on immortality of a kind that apparently never existed prior to Adam's Fall. What all this means is that had Adam and Eve never sinned, their children would have been born without sin. Humanity would have populated the earth and maybe other planets or God would have ended procreation when He saw fit.

However, with thousands upon thousands upon thousands of saved individuals (from millennia past, present, future) there is no need to procreate. And unlike Adam and Eve, the saved are now sealed. Memories of past mortal life events obliterated forever. Mortals cannot fathom life without sex or even time. We are presently still trying to visualize eternity with our perceptions still focused in the here and now.

I believe that Adam was a very handsome healthy athletic 30 year old looking dude. Eve would have been a natural beauty made for Adam to love.
_LittleNipper
_Emeritus
Posts: 4518
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:49 pm

Re: My Favorite (to date) take down of Creationism.

Post by _LittleNipper »

The CCC wrote:LittleNipper.

So sex is only useful because its utilitarian in only one way? What a myopic view of what a loving giving relationship is.


Our relationship will be towards God. The Church is the bride of Christ and not other believers.
Post Reply