Why we celebrate the birth of Christ

The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.
_Gazelam
_Emeritus
Posts: 5659
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:06 am

Post by _Gazelam »

Fine, show me the link between man and ape. Show me why suddenly we leaped from picking berries in trees to harvest and culture.

The leap isnt there because it was never needed.
We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. - Plato
_Mephitus
_Emeritus
Posts: 820
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 1:44 pm

Re: Marg

Post by _Mephitus »

well, you can start with these that you obviously didn't read.

marg wrote:
Hi Gaz,

You might find these sites interesting.

http://www.becominghuman.org/

http://www.answers.com/Modern%20man Note the line: The oldest known fossil remains date to c. 120,000 years ago-or much earlier (c. 400,000 years ago) if evidence of certain archaic varieties is included.

Evidence goes well beyond only tools Gaz,. There's genetic evidence, archeological evidence, fossils which all support much greater than 6,000 years for modern man existing.

Here's another site which might interest you http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/specimen.html


And here's another one with lots of information:

http://www.mnh.si.edu/anthro/humanorigi ... _tree.html

http://www.mnh.si.edu/anthro/humanorigins/



Human Evolution

Human evolution is the lengthy process of change by which people originated from apelike ancestors. Scientific evidence shows that the physical and behavioral traits shared by all people originated from apelike ancestors and evolved over a period of at least 5 million years.

One of the earliest defining human traits, bipedalism -- the ability to walk on two legs -- evolved over 4 million years ago. Other important human characteristics -- such as a large and complex brain, the ability to make and use tools, and the capacity for language -- developed more recently. Many advanced traits -- including complex symbolic expression, art, and elaborate cultural diversity -- emerged mainly during the past 100,000 years.

Humans are primates. Physical and genetic similarities show that the modern human species, Homo sapiens, has a very close relationship to another group of primate species, the apes. Humans and the great apes (large apes) of Africa -- chimpanzees (including bonobos, or so-called “pygmy chimpanzees”) and gorillas -- share a common ancestor that lived between 5 and 8 million years ago. Humans first evolved in Africa, and much of human evolution occurred on that continent. The fossils of early humans who lived between 2 and 5 million years ago come entirely from Africa.

Most scientists currently recognize some 10 to 15 different species of early humans. Scientists do not all agree, however, about how these species are related or which ones simply died out. Many early human species -- certainly the majority of them -- left no living descendants. Scientists also debate over how to identify and classify particular species of early humans, and about what factors influenced the evolution and extinction of each species.

Early humans first migrated out of Africa into Asia probably between 1.6 million and 2 million years ago. They entered Europe somewhat later, generally within the past million years. Species of modern humans populated many parts of the world much later. For instance, people first came to Australia probably within the past 60,000 years and to the Americas within the past 30,000 years or so. The beginnings of agriculture and the rise of the first civilizations occurred within the past 10,000 years.
One nice thing is, ze game of love is never called on account of darkness - Pepe Le Pew
_Gazelam
_Emeritus
Posts: 5659
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:06 am

Post by _Gazelam »

I did read it, and went to each of the links. They prove nothing. Man did not come from ape, there is no link.

don't you think it strange that society isnt discovered until what, 35,000 years ago? and even that isnt nailed down, pick any number between 100,000 and 6,000. Your sure to match up with someones theory. There is nothing wrong with claiming 6,ooo years ago Adam began the human race. Its as strong a statement as any scientists, and the Holy Ghost testifies of Adam. Those who actually make contact with God by doing what he says know this.

Now go seek out a revelation and you'll know as well.
We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. - Plato
_Gazelam
_Emeritus
Posts: 5659
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:06 am

Post by _Gazelam »

115,000 years we're like this:

Image

then suddenly, out of the blue...One brave man stands upright and says: "hey Steve, c';mere, look, this fruits got seeds inside, we can plant this stuff and grow it ! No more of this wandering around clubbing rabbits and climbing trees for bannanas !"
We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. - Plato
_marg

Post by _marg »

Gazelam wrote:In regards to your africa researchs:

Jelinek, Arthur J., "The Lower Paleolithic: Current Evidence and Interpretations," Annual Review of Anthropology 6 (1977): 28.

"the entire excavated area of occupation surfaces (all over the world) is well under the size of a modern football field." At Olduvai, 80 percent of the material comes from a band of strata representing only 4 percent of the time-span of occupation.



Gaz, can I have Jelinek's definition of "occupation surfaces" ? Did you put in the words "(all over the world)" or are those Jelinek's words?

And I don't understand the point of this one sentence quote. What is it supposed to be saying or what did you think the reader of your post would infer from it?



Gaz
All those Jaws and teeth don't prove anything.


Physical evidence proves the existence of something, in this case fossil bones which represent a living entity at a point in time in the past. It isn't a matter of speculation or making an claim absent evidence as is typical of religiously based claims. And the more bones (quantity) and the condition of the bones (quality) found the more evidence accumulates such that attributes of a species, what area they lived in, how long ago, genetic information is some of the data which helps to present a clearer picture from which theories are formed about the bones.

I'll address the rest of your post later...
_marg

Post by _marg »

cont'd

Gaz
At what point during your long drawn out history of evolution did this quantum leap from primate to social animal occur? Why is it that it was only in the supposed 35,000 years that man became man? Your whole theory is preposterous.


One theory is that man may have developed an ability to vocalize more sounds and then developed the ability to communicate more precisely to eventually developing language.

Spencer Wells addresses this in the newspaper Guardian which I’ll copy. http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/feature/ ... .html?=rss

The great leap


About 60,000 years ago humans were on the brink of extinction. An evolutionary eyeblink later, there are over six billion of us. How did we do it? By Spencer Wells

Thursday July 3, 2003
The Guardian
Sitting on the M25, staring grimly at the surrounding traffic, you sigh. Late for work again ... and it seems to be getting worse. You know the stats: more than six billion people in the world today, increasing to nine billion by the middle of the century. The average speed of traffic through London is less now than it was in the days of horse-drawn carriages. You catch the end of a Radio 4 show - something about the threat of human extinction thousands of years ago. "Yeah right!" you think, looking out at the endless sea of cars. But the notion keeps coming back to you. Could it be true? If it is, what led us from endangered species to motorway mayhem in an evolutionary eyeblink?
Let me take you back through time. Back past the Beatles, Churchill, the Boer War (only 1.5 billion people alive), Krakatoa, the French revolution. At this point the world population is around a billion. You accelerate, back past the Norman invasion, Julius Caesar, the first farming communities. Here, about 10,000 years ago, there are only a few million people. Around 20,000 years ago there are no people in America; 40,000 years ago you notice a change in Europe - the Neanderthals are in charge. At 50,000 years ago Australia is part of an uninhabited continent. Before that (apart from the Neanderthals) you only find people living in Africa. Interesting. You head back to 100,000 years ago just to make sure. There seem to be more people - but still limited to Africa - and finally settle on 60,000 years ago as the low point. Then there were as few as 2,000 humans in existence. The worst time in the history of our species; one we nearly didn't survive.
But why were things so bad, and why does it seem to coincide with the time we left Africa to populate the rest of the world? Surely a species poised on the brink of extinction was not the obvious choice to create M25 gridlock within 2,500 generations?
We can probably blame much of it on the weather. Around 60,000 years ago the Earth was in the middle of an ice age, the effect of which was pretty chilling in the far north but in Africa it caused different problems. The ice sheets sucked up much of the world's moisture, causing widespread droughts particularly in Africa where the tropical latitude and intense sunshine, coupled with the lower moisture levels had a major environmental effect.
But our mass exodus from Africa was not only a matter of escape from bad weather; it was also about brain power. In many ways we are very much like our ape cousins, but we are different in a rather important respect - one that our species' Latin name sums up quite succinctly: we are Homo sapiens, or "wise man". Our brains define us as a species. How we came to have so much grey matter is a long story, and one that leads us even further back in time than our hardships on the African veldt 60,000 years ago.
Several recent discoveries have revealed ape-like creatures that could walk upright around 5m years ago. Perhaps the best documented is Ardipithecus, discovered in the 90s. Around the time of Ardipithecus it seems that some apes decided to walk around on two legs. This probably happened as a result of - wait for it - climate change. Africa went through a particularly bad drought around 6m years ago, which resulted in the drying up of the Mediterranean and seems to have set in motion some rather significant changes in the hominid - and ultimately human - lineage. Over time, these upright apes became completely bipedal, allowing them to see further and run faster, while leaving the hands free to do other things...which they started to do in earnest around 2m years ago when we see the first evidence of tool use by our ancestors. Homo erectus, the master toolmaker of the era, had a much bigger brain than his ancestors and developed many of the elements of modern human behaviour, probably including the use of fire and some form of rudimentary language. He even seems to have wandered out of Africa around 1.8m years ago - Java Man and Peking Man were both part of the Homo erectus family. He didn't stray far from the tropics, though (particularly when the world cooled down during the periodic ice ages), and was already on his way to extinction around 100,000 years ago.
After this change in abilities that led to the erectus African exodus, a long period of stasis seems to have set in. The hominids in the ensuing 1.7m years grew larger brains; several species appeared and then became extinct, and some even wandered out of Africa - giving rise to the Neanderthals in Europe about a quarter of a million years ago. During this time there were no big innovations. The tools used a million years ago in Africa do not differ much from those used by the Neanderthals 900 millennia later.
Then, about 60,000 years ago (give or take), something important happened in Africa - a sea change in human behaviour. Tools became much more finely crafted. They were made of materials like bone, which allowed the development of deadlier weapons. Group hunting methods became more efficient. Art also made an appearance -clear evidence that our ancestors were capable of abstract, contemplative thought. Overall, it really isn't hyperbole to talk about a "great leap forward" in mental abilities, to use anthropologist Jared Diamond's term.
What caused the great leap? Was it, as some researchers believe, a favourable mutation in a language gene - such as the recently described FOXP2 gene, implicated in some hereditary speech defects? The jury is still out, but recent studies suggest that complex characteristics (perhaps including modern syntactic language) can be created from pre-existing genetic variations. As conditions worsened during the ice age, our brains had to become better, and changes that favoured this would have been worth their weight in gold - or at least antelope meat.
The by-product of these changes was that we gained the skills to leave Africa in earnest: not the tentative stabs at Eurasia that had been made by our hominid ancestors, but a full onslaught. By looking at a combination of clues from the human genome and archaeology we can trace two routes - one along the southern coast of Asia, which reached Australia around 50,000 years ago. Another route, inland via the Middle East, would lead to the settlement of Europe by around 35,000 years ago and to the Americas (via the Siberian arctic) 20,000 years later. Along the way our ancestors encountered conditions that would test their abilities to the limit, but the great leap had given them the critical survival tools that allowed them to adapt. In the past 10,000 years alone we have evolved from conquering hunter-gatherers to today's frustrated commuter. Such is progress. Ultimately, the most amazing thing to come out of this research is the fact that the billions of humans alive today expanded from a small population living in Africa around 60,000 years ago. Effectively, we're all cousins separated by, at most, a couple of thousand generations. So the next time you're sitting in traffic, just blame the great leap. And try to remember that the driver in front is one of the family.
• Spencer Wells is former head of the population genetics research group at Oxford's Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics



Goz
Go ahead and study your monkeys flinging poo from trees. The only connection you'll find to man is in Coggins posts. There is no link. There is no quantum leap.


I have no idea why you are mentioning Coggins. Quantum leap is a term coined by Jared Diamond. Evidence of tools, art and travel indicated modern man’s innovative ability and this showed up about 40,000 years ago in Cro-Magnon man. Evidence from Neanderthals didn’t indicate innovation such as changes to tools, creation of art or much travel even though they lived over a 60,000 year period until about 40,000 years ago. While the dates are estimates the main point is that evidence for innovation didn’t show up for Neanderthals even though they live on earth 10’s of thousands of years. It did in Cro-magnon man and a speculation of the main difference was possibly their ability to communication.


Gaz
Culture defines Man. A written record. Not bones found in a field and assumptions based on imagination.


What is at issue here Gaz is that you stated you concurred with an LDS president (don’t remember his name) who stated that man has lived on this earth for 6,000 years. By doing so you ignore the fossil evidence of Neanderthals, Cro-Magnons, as well as other hominid fossils dated well before 6,000 years. You ignore the evidence of genetic dating and you rely on an authority who has supplied no evidence. There is evidence of sophisticated tools and art before 6,000 years as well which shoots down your theory one which is based on imagination not evidence. Let's see, you think a God that in itself is speculation, plunked down a human man, Adam who had the ability to read and write and make sophisticated tools. An already preprogrammed human. So what did God create other hominids for, who are not extinct? How is it we have evidence of tools and art before 6,000 years if Adam arrived 6,000 years ago?

If you are interested in the evolution and development of culture this site gives information. For brevity I won’t post the contents.

http://anthro.palomar.edu/homo2/mod_homo_5.htm

Gaz
It is the easiest thing in the world to imagine a primitive man. Ask a child with a crayon to draw a caveman, they can really go to town on that. And men in the middle ages did the same thing without all our fancy modern scientific field work.


What are you talking about? What do men in the middle ages have to do with this discussion? What does a child drawing a primitive man have to do with this discussion? where is the relevance?

The gap between a record keeper and a chimpanzee is far too large to be filled with all your whimsical scientific ponderings. But feel free to postulate ad nauseum.


Of the living current species we are closest genetically to the common chimp and the pygmy chimp. But we split from them about 5 - 6 million years ago. We have closer genetic relatives, other hominids but they are extinct. Care to speculate why god created them, when god created them and why god let them become extinct? How do hominids work into the scheme of things in your thinking Gaz? I believe that was my initial question to you some posts back
_MormonMendacity
_Emeritus
Posts: 405
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 12:56 am

Post by _MormonMendacity »

Even among educated people, evolution is often a very misunderstood concept because of their arrogance.

Some have taken the notion to mean that the highly subjective concept of "improvement" is the ultimate purpose of evolution. Gould argues very persuasively that that is not the "purpose" of evolution, as if there was one. He points out that even Darwin did a little flip-flop on that idea in order to make man's progression and existence jibe with our arrogant assumptions.

In "Full House", Gould accuses humanity of trying to argue that evolution results in "improvement" (with humans as proof) without looking at all species and recognizing that the most successful products of evolution have been around since the beginning and amount to most of the life-forms in existence: bacteria.

Humans prove our arrogance by thinking that our reasoning abilities are what "...evolution wanted to achieve".

It attempts to debunk a generally accepted concept.
"Suppose we've chosen the wrong god. Every time we go to church we're just making him madder and madder" --Homer Simpson's version of Pascal's Wager
Religion began when the first scoundrel met the first fool.
Religion is ignorance reduced to a system.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: getting back to the topic

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Sono_hito wrote:You celebrate the birth of jesus(christmas) because of an ancient celebration of the winter solstice by pagans(Yule, or saturnella). Christian clergy tried vainly for many centuries to stem the celebration of this holiday. Since they where unsuccessfull in stopping the celebrations, they modified a small number of practices and then claimed it as theirs. As a history lesson as to the origins of yule, ill re-post a lesson i posted on another forum site.

Yule falls approximately on the Winter Solstice, the shortest day and longest night of the year. After Yule the period of daylight begins to wax, untill it reaches the longest day on June 21, the Summer Solstice. For folks in Northern climes, the Winter Solstice was a most welscome day to anticipate at the dark end of the year, and although months of darkness lay ahead, folk could rest assured Sunna's (the sun) might was on the increase and darkness was waning. Yule is actualy a span of thirteen days, usually counted from the night before the solstice (19 or 20 dec, as it varies from year to year), to the thirteenth night, (usually Jan 6 called "twelfth Night" later by christians). Bebe called Yule eve "Mother Night", and it is thought this night was devoted to honouring the Idises (or Disir, female ancestral spirits) the family protectors. The solstice itself, either 20, 21, or 22 december, is the most important of the Days, when the dead and other beings of the dark fare most freely, Winter Arrives, and humans are closest to the spirit worlds.

Jolfoor (yule-father) and Jolnis (yule) are names of Odin. Some think Odin was the original "Alf" or gift-giving "Elf" (Julesvenn in Denmark, Jultomten in Sweden, and Julenissen in Norway). Before Santa Claus was popularised in the Victorian era as a fat jolly Elf, he was seen as tall and lean, wearing a dark cloak, not a red and white tunic. Earlier legends describe "santa" as riding a white horse, not driving a sleigh pulled by reindeer. This reminds us of Odin's steed Sleipnir. The elder "Yule Elf" was a bit stern also, and could be quite a terrifying figure, especiale to tude or ill-willed folk. This forbidding Yule Father probably arose from ancient legends of the Odensjakt or Wild Host who during Yule tide ride the stormy Winter skies, led by Odin as Oskoreidi. Sometimes people would be taken to join the Wild Host in tumultuous flight. In the christian era folklore advised people to stay inside at night to avoid the furious Host, which was much feared. There are many accounts, especially from Germany, of wayfaring folks being picked up and transported from one place to the other by the throng of the dea, only to be left there lifeless. Other legends tell of those who could lie as dead (presumably in a trance state) while their souls fared aloft with the Wild Host. However, it is quite possible that fearful reputation of the Wild Host was especially encouraged by Christians, who claimed the Wild Huntsman was their devil. From a Heathen perspective it is likely that originally the Wild Host was made up of ecstatuc human devotees of the God Wodan. He is the god of ecstasy, but also of death, so the dead probably always made up part of the Wild Host, which rode with great clamor upon skeletal horses and accompanied by ghostly hounds.

In contrast to the solely horrific nature of the Hunt as seen by Christians, there is a great deal of evidence that Heathens believed fertility and blessings were brought by the Wild Host . Oski, "Fulfiller of Desire," or "Granter of Wishes," is an aspect of Odin that could well be associated with the Yule Elf, for Oskoreidi, Leader of the Wild Host, was known to give gold or other boons to those who were courteous or clever. The greatest boon believed wrought by the Furious Host was that as they rode above the fields they ensured fertility and fruitful harvests. An interesting related custom survived in Germany of leaving the last sheaf of grain cut in the field for the Huntsman's horse, eight-legged Sleipner, Odin's magical steed. This fertility aspect of the Wild Hunt could be connected in some way with the return of the dead to their earthly homes at Yule, for it was thought they brought blessings with them and bestowed them upon their kin. These 'evolved' dead were considered to be Alfar (male Elves) or Disir (powerful female ancestral spirits), a higher soul state some benevolent humans were believed to achieve upon death. These holy Ancestors became guardian spirits of their kin's land, much involved with the continued fertility of the land and its inhabitants. Folk would honour the ancestors by bringing gifts of food and drink to the family howe (burial mound). There also survives the custom of sitting out on a mound in order to get the highly valued advice of the Ancestor within. Indeed the kindred Dead were considered to still be an integral part of the family by Heathens, and were treated as such. The ghostly Wild Hunt is another manifestation of the pervasive Heathen beliefs of the eternal connection of the living with the dead, and the fertility bestowing powers of the Ancestors.

In Scandinavia it is the God Thor who is thought to be the origin of the Yule Elf.
The Julbock or Julbukk, the Yule Goat, who to this day plays a big part in Norse Yule festivities, is thought to derive from Thor's magical goats Tannginost and Tanngrisnir who draw His chariot through the sky. There are many legends that tell of Thor's benevolent protectiveness of human kind, and of his jolly, fun-loving nature (at least when He is not in a Troll-slaying mood). This seems more in line with modern conceptions of jolly Saint Nick than grim Oden the Wild Huntsman. The Yule goats carry the Yule Elf as he visits the folk, bestows gifts, and gets his traditional offering of porridge. Modern Yule decorations of straw formed into goats, straw-goat ornamented wreaths, and a (mock) Yule goat head bourne about on a stick are all memories of Thor's animals. When the Yule log burns on the hearth, some scholars say, it is an offering on Thor's altar. Thus we have the legend of Santa "coming down the chimney".

In Germany Frau Holda, Perchta, or Oskoreidi, and in Scandinavia and England The Wild Huntsman, come at Yule, leading hosts of the dead. The Perchtenlauf and other ritual perambulations are folk memories of earlier pagan processions at Yuletide. Either beautiful or monstrous, the masked Perchten, like the season itself, can be boonful or terrifying, and have their origins in very ancient Heathen beliefs. Winter Solstice is the time when the veils between the worlds are thin, and the dead may most easily manifest to the living. But it is not usually the human dead who were considered the most fearsome wights. At Yuletide spirits of all kinds are abroad; similar beliefs are held by Celtic Pagans of Samhain (Halloween). In Norse lands Trolls of many types are roaming; draugr (rare and evil human ghosts of enormous strength) accost mortals, and the Alfar (Elves) -- both malicious and benevolent -- may drop by the homes of men. Many Yule customs that survive to this day have their origins in practices either meant to ward the home from evil wandering spirits at Yule, or conversely, to welcome good spirits into the home and show them thanks for the blessings they bestow. House wights (tutelary spirits of the home) and the respected dead of the family were welcomed gladly to the Yule feast. Food would be left out on the table for them after all had gone to bed. At Yuletide hosts of dead could be seen (by those so gifted) feasting with great revelry in their mounds, and paying each other friendly visits in each other's howes. Clearly Yule has a dual nature: it is the time of Death and darkness, when trolls, ghosts and alfs fare about, but it is also the time of return of the waxing Sun and celebration of Her promise of Life and light renewed.

The central celebration and rite of Yule is the holy feast. It is thought very important to spare nothing in providing for the guests--both living and dead, human and wight. All good wights shared in the Yule feast; dogs and cats ate the same food as humans, and were brought into the house. Offerings of cream, beer, and bread were left out for the house-wights. If the feast were being held by a chieftain (or a wealthy community leader), many people would be invited and it would last many days, with presents being given to the guests upon their departure. For less wealthy folk, there would be as good a feast as could be provided, and of course the Yule ale would be shared in frith between family members and friends. Sumble (ritual toasts) would be drunk to the Ancestors at this time as well, for Yule was the season for the recognition of the continuance of human life. The Ancestors would naturally be most welcome at the family celebration. Savoury foods such as mutton or leg of lamb, goose, pork, and beef, special Yule breads, porridge, apples, sweets and nuts are traditional. But most important is the Yule ale, brewed stronger than other ales, and considered holy. Oaths were sworn on the bragarfull (holy cup). Sumbles held during the days of Yule, and especially on Mother's Night, the Solstice, and Thirteenth Night are considered to be especially potent, being spoken in the presence of the Gods and wights at the most holy time of year. In Heathen times the sonargöltr (hallowed Yule boar) was led in and the holiest of oaths were sworn upon it, as is recorded in Helgakviða Hjorvarþssonar (The First Lay of Helgi Hjorvarthsson):
"In the evening (Yule-eve) vows were made: the sacrificial boar was led in, men laid their hands on him and swore dear oaths as they drank from the hallowed cup."
Then it was taken and slaughtered (not in a state of fear, but quickly) for the Yule feast. It was believed the soul of the animal went straight to the Gods, while its flesh provided the holy feast. In later times or among those too poor to own pigs, a special boar-shaped bread would take the place of the Yule boar.

Drinking Wassail at Yule is an English custom from Heathen times. 'Wassail' comes from the Anglo-Saxon Wes Hal, meaning "to your health". The beverage is made from ale, wine, and/or cider with fruits and spices added. Traditionally it was used in part as an offering to apple trees in thanks and for their continued fruitfulness. Bits of toast were floated in the wassail bowl, then placed in the branches of the tree, and libations poured over the roots. This is the origin of our term "to toast" someone.

As well as fruit trees, evergreens have long been part of Winter Solstice celebrations. The evergreen tree, which keeps its leaves throughout the year, is an obvious symbol of the endurance of life through the cold and dark Winter months. Beer, bread, and table scraps were offered to trees in Scandinavia. In South Germany arose the custom of a branch or small tree brought inside and decorated with offerings to the spirit of the tree. This Yule tree was considered to represent the luck of the family (as the old Bairnstock did) as well as being honoured as a powerful wight in its own right, capable of bestowing fertility in the coming year. The cosmic tree, Yggdrasil is an evergreen yew in some traditions, and an ash (rowan = European mountain ash ) in others. Both trees have bright red berries; possibly this is one origin of decorating the modern Yule tree with berries. The cosmic tree (the Axis mundi) bears all nine worlds of the Norse cosmos in its branches and among its roots, so perhaps tree ornaments in part represent the nine worlds. Trees are sacred to Germanic and Celtic peoples, and there are many ancient traditions of offerings tied onto trees as gifts to them, this practice is the most probable origin for the custom of decorating Yule trees with gifts. In Heathen times offerings were made to the Alfar (wights who govern growth and fertility in nature) in gratitude for harvest yields. The evergreen boughs brought inside to "deck the halls" represent the ever-renewed life force and serve to welcome good Alfar into the house. Not surprisingly, these holy boughs also served to protect the home from evil wights. Yew, rowan, and holly boughs are traditional Heathen choices for hall-decking.

Another Yule tradition that survives from Heathen times is the burning of a Yule Log. This was a specially chosen tree that was to burn for at least twelve hours, but possibly it originally burned for all twelve days of Yule. In some legends the log was offered to Thor. Oak would be the most appropriate choice, but any hardwood considered holy from the locality is suitable. English lore holds that Yule logs should not be bought, they should be gotten from one's own property, or a neighbour's. The log of course must be massive, and must be handled with care and clean hands, out of respect. In some places a whole tree trunk was brought in, and one end was placed in hearth. Then it was gradually fed in as it burned, to be finally consumed on the final night. The tradition is that the presence of the remnants or ashes of the Yule log in the house would protect it all year from lightning and would bring good luck. The new Yule log should be started with some splinters of the previous year's. Holly and other winter greenery is often used to decorate the Yule log. Today Heathens at need substitute a large candle (or series of candles) for it, and burn them starting on Mother's Night, all through the thirteen nights of the holy tide. This is done to honour and aid Sunna through the darkest time of the year, to ward off ill wights of darkness that might be about at Yule, and to symbolise the lengthening of daylight after Solstice.

Although it falls during the darkest time of year, Yuletide is holy and a time of peace. Frith is held between everyone, and all are focused on celebration, family, feasting,honouring the Ancestors, making holy oaths, and peace.


sonohito,

Isn't it true that the image you use below your posts is a modified image of the "Jesus Fish" that you yourself now claim as your own in order to represent your identity? Does that negate the value of the symbol to you?

Jersey Girl
_Mephitus
_Emeritus
Posts: 820
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 1:44 pm

Post by _Mephitus »

sonohito,

Isn't it true that the image you use below your posts is a modified image of the "Jesus Fish" that you yourself now claim as your own in order to represent your identity? Does that negate the value of the symbol to you?

Jersey Girl


Actualy, i use it more as a joke than anything else.(a friend of mine made it) Just as an evolutionist activist would use the "evolution fish" to spark thought, debate, or humour. Its kinda the same situation with my signature. Every pagan I've shown the sig to laugh uncontrollably.

Much of what i do or say, i use as an offset to "normal" rather than what could be acrued as "devoutness" as far as my religious beliefs go. Which kinda fits with my religious choice anyhow, since Asatru isnt a literalist religion.
One nice thing is, ze game of love is never called on account of darkness - Pepe Le Pew
Post Reply