Jason Bourne wrote:This question has been a source of questions for me for a long time, given the contradictory doctrine taught in the temple and in the KFD.
Jesus cannot be a special case: God is no respector of persons.
I am not sure that this scripture applies to this context.
Why would it not?
Jesus was God since the beginning: see Jason's post.
Do you agree?
The jury's still out for me.
God was once a man: KFD
I interpret Joseph Smith in this discourse to mean that he was a man same way Jesus was. The Father was a savior of a world, in my opinion the first world.
This is false doctrine of the first order. A man = us. Jesus was never like us; Jesus's father was Father. None of us has Father as our father, like Jesus does. We will never be like them, because they were never like us.
As God is, we can become: temple endowment
I have listened closely to the endowment and cannot find where it says we will be Gods. It does refer to royal status under God's dominion however.
Ye shall become Gods and Goddesses.... don't make me quote it here.
Yet.... Jesus was God since the beginning: see above.
Yes.
Maybe.
[/quote]Contradictory doctrine.
For me the early theology of the Church does cause some conflict with later doctrine. Personally I have tried to correlate it. But members are confused. Gaz is prety knowledgeable about LDS doctrine. Yet his comments about Jesus not being fully god till after the resurrection conflict with the Book of Mormon, Much of the D&C, the Lectures on Faith, the Bible.
Gaz is out to lunch a lot. This may be one of those times he's having a noon nap attack.