Commentary on the Spalding/Rigdon thread

The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.
_Uncle Dale
_Emeritus
Posts: 3685
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 7:02 am

Post by _Uncle Dale »

marg wrote:

The reason I was asking you questions regarding the map is I was having difficulty understanding the point you
were making in your post. I gather that Gad Stafford moved from Palmyra (or some place close) during the period
Smith was into treasure seeking and he moved to Auburn about 6 miles from Bainbridge where Rigdon was living.
So that it's likely Gad may have talked with Rigdon and informed him about Smith or Rigdon heard from someone
Gad talked to about Smith? Is that what you were essentially pointing out.



When you are out hunting deer and see a pair of antlers off in the distant brush, you do not know at first glance
whether the animal thus seen falls within the scope of your hunting permit -- or whether, if it does not, there might
be other "huntable" deer nearby.

Gadius Stafford, husband and cousin of Lydia Stafford, daughter of the noted Manchester seer and money-digger, is
just such a deer in the distance. But, as I just said, where there is one deer there may be more, marg.

An inter-married group of Rhode-Islanders comprised a large segment of the early Manchester pioneer population.
They were typically unorthodox in their religion and they were probably drawn to the area by the toleration shown
to Quakers there --- recall that Martin Harris' wife was a Quaker, as was the landlord of the Smith homestead.

Among these odd Rhode-Islanders were the Staffords, who had been seers and astrologers back in New England and
who carried that family tradition with them to Manchester. It was to be expected that they and the magic-minded
Joseph Smith, Sr. family would intermingle in their respective treasure-seeking and fortune-telling activities. John L.
Brooke has talked about all of this and part of his book is available on the Google Books site, so I won't here go into
details about this extended family and their neighbors, except to say that a number of them moved west into Ohio
after 1818 and settled in Auburn -- then a sparsely-occupied frontier wilderness.

From Auburn a number of the same group later migrated to Michigan. I view them as one large and nebulous extended
family. The first of the bunch was in Auburn by 1820 at least -- and as more and more of them arrived, the population
of Auburn became a sort of Little Manchester -- or Little Palmyra/Phelps/Macedon. A fellow from Ontario Co., NY had
purchased a large amount of land in Auburn and he must have talked his neighbors into moving there and buying farms.

The Stafford descendants place Gadius and Lydia Stafford in Auburn as early as 1824 -- but I have seen no property
tax records or land transfer records to document that claim. The couple's son Anson was born in Manchester in the
spring of 1826 -- so at least Lydia was still back home at that time. Gad sold his NY farm to Russell Stoddard early in
1828, so either he or his lawyer was there in Manchester to make that transfer then. Local history says that Gad arrived
in Auburn in 1827 -- which seems about right. But the time period is a little too late for him to have provided a meeting
place for Rigdon and Smith (and Cowdery?) for their secretive compilation of the Book of Mormon.

Thus, I am now looking at Gad's relatives and neighbors, who arrived a year or two before he did -- to see which of
them were probably Smith-followers (or at least money-diggers, or close friends of money-diggers). My guess is, that
if Rigdon and Smith did meet in Auburn during 1826, that those meetings took place at the home of one of Gad's friends
or relatives. This information is getting too close to what I plan to say in my upcoming journal article(s) -- so I cannot
go into details about WHO I think provided a meeting place for the secretive pair, or WHY I think Cowdery was there.

If that's not what you were saying I'd have to reread. And this information you say Dan ignores and doesn't
want to acknowledge it, even in discussions if it's brought up.



He may yet surprise us and pull out his Gadius Stafford file for all the world to see -- something he strangely did not
do in his EMD volumes. We shall see.

But my special area of interest now is a series of 1840s articles from a Geauga Co. newspaper, discovered 100 years
later by Prof. Carl M. Brewster, which provide details about the 1820s money-diggers in Auburn. When last I was in
Chardon, Ohio, I began looking through the old newspapers there. I found two of Brewster's cited articles but they were
from the 1860s and did not mention Rigdon and Smith. I have friends in Ohio looking into files in Columbus, Cleveland
and Chardon, as we speak. I'll report the findings in the journal article I mentioned earlier.

That is really about all I can say. Read George Wilber, Charles E. Henry, Isaac Butts, Amarilla Brooks, Emily Rockwell,
Dencey Thompson, John Henry, Orrin Henry, Lawrence Greatrake, Darwin Atwater, etc. for the old testimony.

Dale
Last edited by Bedlamite on Mon Mar 12, 2007 11:53 pm, edited 7 times in total.
_Uncle Dale
_Emeritus
Posts: 3685
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 7:02 am

Re: When did Gad Stafford move to Auburn?

Post by _Uncle Dale »

jhammel wrote:Hi Dale,

The 1880 source you cited says Gad Stafford moved to Auburn in 1827, but this source says 1824: http://www.rootsweb.com/~ohgeauga/query005.htm

I tried e-mailing Mike Stafford at the address provided by the site, but unsuccessfully.

Do you have reason to believe one source over the other?

Jeff




Mike and I are in communication about this, Jeff. I think he agrees that Gad's son Anson was born in Manchester --
so that at least puts Gad's wife back in NY in June of 1826. In the basement of the Chardon Public Library there are
microfilms of the personal property records of Auburn Twp. residents for 1825-26-27-28-29. I thought I had copies
of those pages, but if so, cannot locate them right now. My memory has been getting progressively worse these last
few months. I can hardly recall my own phone number any more -- let alone research notes from Ohio, etc.

But, as I said to marg -- it is not Gadius, but rather a neighbor of his, also from Manchester, that I have my eyes upon.
To get me closer to that, I need the land plats for Auburn for 1820, 1825 and 1830, the originals of which are at the
Chardon Records Center -- and which can be photocopied in 11x17 sheets at $2 per copy. If I ever got those, I can't
remember where I put them.

Also at the Chardon Records Center, there are index lists for land transferes, etc. dating back before 1820. Gadius
purchased his property in Kirtland (not to be confused with Kirtland Mills, up north) from Leicester (Lester) Perkins,
so there should be records of that transaction in the deeds, indentures, and maybe mortgage files -- also Staffords in
the probate records, but those came later.

Here's the oldest land plat of the township I could find, from my last trip to Chardon, with Gary:
http://www.sidneyrigdon.com/books/1857Aub1.jpg

Notice how the Brewster properties more or less surround the northern edges of the Capron-Stafford lands, just
north of George Wilber's place ---- Prof. Carl M. Brewster came from that family in Auburn, and that is why he was
personally interested in old Auburn traditions about money-digging and Sidney Rigdon.

Notice also all of the Manchester, NY Antisdales' land ---- oops, I'm saying too much. Better quit while I'm ahead.

That's all for now --
UD
_mentalgymnast

Re: When did Gad Stafford move to Auburn?

Post by _mentalgymnast »

Well, I've made it to the end of page three over on the Spalding Thread. It's a long read, but I plan on getting through the whole thing. At the end of that page DB makes an interesting comment:

"Without some early sources, claiming to provide an explanation of how the two men might have met and became so psychologically intimate, as to be able to plan fraudulent methods to found a new church, I am pretty much lost.

I think both men were "true believers" in certain aspects of their religion and of "the Restoration," but how they could have ever joined such supernatural beliefs or delusions or paranormal experiences into a church-founding conspiracy, still eludes my grasp."

Spalding theory requires collaboration/conspiracy in things of a spiritual nature. And then keeping it quiet. I find that to be a real barrier to belief in Spalding even though there are interesting connections,etc.

To be honest, as I've read this and that written by those that are confirmed skeptics in regards to the origin of the Book of Mormon, I come away thinking that the ins and outs of accepting this or that theory as to how the Book of Mormon came to be, takes more mentalgymnastics to come to grips with and dovetail with all the conflicting evidence,etc., than looking at the possibility that what the book says about itself and how it came forth may in the end make the most sense and provide the greatest degree of cohesiveness.

One does have to accept the possibility of divine intervention/involvement though.

Regards,
MG
_marg

Re: When did Gad Stafford move to Auburn?

Post by _marg »

mentalgymnast wrote:One does have to accept the possibility of divine intervention/involvement though.

Regards,
MG


Not so MG, one doesn't have to accept the supernatural. If I see a magic trick and don't understand it, I don't assume the supernatural, I only assume there is a natural explanation.
_Uncle Dale
_Emeritus
Posts: 3685
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 7:02 am

Re: When did Gad Stafford move to Auburn?

Post by _Uncle Dale »

mentalgymnast wrote:Well, I've made it to the end of page three over on the Spalding Thread...

To be honest, as I've read this and that written by those that are confirmed skeptics in regards to the origin
of the Book of Mormon, I come away thinking that the ins and outs of accepting this or that theory as to how the Book of Mormon
came to be, takes more mentalgymnastics to come to grips with and dovetail with all the conflicting evidence,
etc., than looking at the possibility that what the book says about itself and how it came forth may in the end
make the most sense and provide the greatest degree of cohesiveness....



I have been pondering this problem for a number of years -- most of which were spent as a fully observant,
tithe-paying, calling-accepting/magnifying, prophet-following Latter Day Saint. But I seemed to be the only member
who had such questions; and when I asked my Reorganized LDS priesthood superiors for answers they typically
just referred me back to the RLDS Book of Mormon and the statements of the 3 witnesses and the 8 witnesses.
In doing this, they would tell me that the witness statements in that volume of our "standard works" had been
prayed over and witnessed to by hundreds of thousands of members, and that my questions could not possibly be
of any consequence, when weighed against that overwhelming amount of spiritual testimony. Of course the same
priesthood superiors who told me that, also told me the RLDS constituted the one true church, that the Joseph Smith
family men at Nauvoo never engaged in nor condoned polygamy, and that Brigham Young was the false prophet
of an apostate splinter group. So I felt I had reason to distrust their response.

In pursuing my quest for answers, I have been struck by these several historical oddities:

1. Sidney Rigdon in cooperation with a second elder, founded the Church of Christ in Pittsburgh, in 1823-24. Rigdon
thereafter always claimed that the true restored Church of Christ required two topmost leaders -- a seer and a
spokesman for the seer. For most of his early career as a Latter Day Saint, Rigdon claimed to be that spokesman;
but in his later years, running his own post-Nauvoo splinter group, he claimed to be the seer. Near the end of his life
he lamented that the restored Church of Christ still lacked a divinely-appointed spokesman, and was thus unestablished.

2. Sidney Rigdon, while serving as the second elder of that first branch of the Church of Christ, produced a short
pseudo-scriptural text, purporting to be an ancient revelation, attributed to one of Jesus' apostles, and titled the
"Third Epistle of Peter." If Rigdon did not write every word of that phoney scripture, he was at least involved in its
production, as it was written and published by the leadership of the Pittsburgh branch of the restored Church of Christ,
a leadership which only had two elders: himself and Walter Scott. Scott was never afterwards involved in the writing
of any pseudo-scripture, but Rigdon continued to produce such "revelations" almost to the time of his death.

3. Before he became a Mormon, Elder Rigdon was associated with the Rev. Alexander Campbell and other members of
the "Reformed Baptists." Rigdon had an oppertunity to see first-hand what effect the introduction of changed scripture
had upon those Christians -- for they would only accept religious doctrines and practices if they could find those things
written in scripture, and during the mid-1820s they had Alexander Campbell's new Bible to consult. Since Cambell's
New Testament changed many words from the King James Version, the Reformed Baptists used it as their religious
guidebook. For example, in Campbell's Bible, "baptism" was re-worded as "immersion," so those people demanded
that all of their baptisms be full immersions. Campbell's Bible also re-worded "angel" as "messenger," so some of those
people took to viewing modern religious messengers as being equal to biblical angels, etc. etc.

4. At the time Sidney Rigdon moved to Bainbridge, Ohio he was beginning to experience a religious conflict with the
followers of Alexander Campbell. Most of the Campbellite "Reformed Baptists" denied the occurrence of modern
"gifts of the spirit" and said that they were unnecessary until the coming of the millennium, at which time everybody
would have such spiritual communication and manifestations. Rigdon, however, was experiencing visions and divine
revelations of his own, and he seems to have sincerely believed that Campbell was terribly mistaken on that particular
doctrinal point. It eventually became the major reason why Rigdon left the Reformed Baptists. They wished to restore
"the ancient order of things" from apostolic Christianity, while Rigdon wished to restore "all things" biblical, including the
gifts and abiding presence of the Holy Ghost, primitive Christian communitarianism, priesthood authority, etc.

5. By the time Sidney Rigdon left Bainbridge and moved to Mentor, Ohio (very near Kirtland Mills, where the RLDS
Temple still stands), he had separated himself from Campbell's followers to the extent that his own congregations
began to be known as "Rigdonites." During the latter part of 1827, and 1828-30, they still used Campbell's new Bible,
but many of the Rigdon followers began to believe in and practice his innovated form of Christian primitivism -- for
example, some of his followers at Kirtland Mills erstablished a commune, based upon the one in the Book of Acts --
and Parley P. Pratt records that near the end of this period heavenly visions were being manifested among these people.

6. In the time before Rigdon left Bainbridge, to move permantly to Mentor, he was a visionary and a radical restorer,
looking for other visionaries who shared his beliefs and experiences. It is very likely that he was also looking for a
fellow leader for what was just then emerging as his own following of "Rigdonites." In short, Rigdon began to see himself
as a very vocal, often-preaching "spokesman," but he still needed to associate himself with a "seer" -- so that they,
like Moses and Aaron in days of old, could lead the restored "House of Israel" to a gathering in the promised land of
America, in anticipation of the second coming of Christ.

So there you have it ---- Sidney Rigdon in that position in 1826-27, a spokesman without a seer. A leader without a
new revelation which his followers would accept and use to reform and restore a godly religion. A believer in the several
dispensations of the gospel without the means to bring forth the final dispensation. A visionary who was still not accepted
by his followers as a seer. A man previously associated with pseudo-scripture and new Bibles. A man looking for an
equal in God's eyes, so that the two of them could bring forth and establish the cause of Zion, by Christianizing the
lost descendants of Jacob in the American promised land, the Israelite Indians of the west.

Now, add to that picture one final element.

In 1827 Sidney Rigdon, this visionary spokesman seeking a companion seer, lived within walking distance of a follower
of Joseph Smith -- Gad Stafford -- a man who came from a family of seers and who was at that very time engaging in
treasure-seeking activities near Rigdon's home, using one of the seerstones of the Stafford family (as reported by
Richard L. Bushman, in his new Joseph Smith biography).

Oh yes ----- and add one more thing: Add the testimony of a man who lived halfway between the homes of Sidney and
Gad, and who worked every day at a school within a few hundred feet of Rigdon's Bainbridge cabin. What was that
man's testimony? Why, it was that Joseph Smith, Jr. came to visit the area where his old Manchester neighbors, friends,
associates and money-digging followers had moved to. And that Smith there met fellow visionary Sidney Rigdon. -- And
add also the testimony of Rigdon's kids' nursemaid, who said that Rigdon was then writing the same sort of revelations
given to him by long-dead holy men as he would produce by the dozens in his post-Nauvoo years --- but that there
were also one or two OTHER spiritual-scripture-writers then residing in the area, and that together they were compiling
what later became the Book of Mormon.

These were the same two visionaries who only a few years later would stand together in open vision, in the presence
of Jesus Christ, and have revealed unto them the three heavenly degrees of glory.

When did Sidney and Joseph have their first such joint-vision? Could it have been near Bainbridge, Ohio in
the year 1826? See George Wilber's testimony. See Dencey Thompson's testimony. See the census, land, tax and
historical records proving that Joe Smith's neighbors and money-digging followers were living within walking distance
of Elder Rigdon's Bainbridge cabin during the 1820s ----- and then you tell me, MG -- tell me this:

Should we investigate this matter any farther; or should we stop looking into it right this very moment?

Uncle Dale
Last edited by Bedlamite on Thu Mar 15, 2007 6:38 pm, edited 3 times in total.
_Uncle Dale
_Emeritus
Posts: 3685
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 7:02 am

The Kirtland Area Anti-Mormon Committee

Post by _Uncle Dale »

<contents moved here from Vogel's thread, so as not to interfere with his discussions>

I presented a paper on the topic of Hurlbut's interactions with the anti-Mormon committee, etc., in the Community
of Christ Temple in Independence, Missouri, in 2000. My responder, Mike Riggs, refused to address a single historical
item in my paper -- he spent his entire response period ridiculing the Spalding-Rigdon explanation for Mormon origins
and had the audience laughing at his remarks to the point that most of them forgot all about my paper.

I will cut-n-paste in part of the appendix to that paper, which I doubt Riggs even bothered to read. Dan says that such
web transcriptions amount to peer-reviewed journal publication. I certianly hope not. This is very preliminary stuff.
http://olivercowdery.com/hurlbut/HCrisis3.htm#add2

Dale

appendix to 2000 Broadhurst paper wrote:
Identifying The "Anti-Mormon Committee" of 1833-34.

It may tempting for historical generalizers to simply pull a few names out of the pages of Kirtland era Mormon history and assign the blame (or the honors) for early anti-Mormonism to a few well-known characters like D. Philastus Hurlbut and Eber D. Howe. In fact, Howe's own newspaper helpfully provides what appears to be a list of the Kirtland region anti-Mormon "persecutors" in its edition of Friday, Jan. 31, 1834:

Information from E. D. Howe's Painesville Telegraph:

"The undersigned Committee appointed by a public meeting held in Kirtland, Geauga co., Ohio, for the purposes of ascertaining the origin of the Book of Mormon, would say to the Public, that when met as directed by said meeting, it became a subject of deliberation whether the committee without violating the spirit of that instrument which declares that "no human authority can in any case whatever control or interfere with the rights of conscience" could take measures to avert the evils which threaten the Public by the location in this vicinity, of Joseph Smith Jun. otherwise known as the Mormon Prophet -- and who is now, under pretence of Divine Authority, collecting about him an impoverished population, alienated in feeling from other portions of the community, thereby threatening us with an insupportable weight of pauperism.

The committee were of opinion that the force of truth ought without delay to be applied to the Book of Mormon, and the character of Joseph Smith, Jun. With this object in view, the Committee employed D. P. Hurlbut to ascertain the real origin of the Book of Mormon, and to examine the validity of Joseph Smith's claims to the character of a Prophet.

The result of this enquiry so far as it has proceeded has been partially laid before the public in this vicinity by Mr. Hurlbut -- and the Committee are now making arrangements for the Publication and extensive circulation of a work which will prove the "Book, of Mormon" to be a work of fiction and imagination, and written more than twenty years ago, in Salem, Ashtabula County, Ohio, by Solomon Spalding, Esq., and completely divest Joseph Smith of all claims to the character of an honest man, and place him at an immeasurable distance from the high station which he pretends to occupy.

O. A. CRARY
AMOS DANIELS.
JOHN F. MORSE.
SAMUEL WILSON
JOSIAH JONES.
WARREN CORNING Jr.
JAMES H. PAINE.
JOS. H. WAKEFIELD.
SYLVESTER CORNWELL.
TIMOTHY D. MARTINDALE."

This notice's language telling of non-Mormon old settlers feeling threatened "with an insupportable weight of pauperism" by all the newly arrived Latter Day Saints may provide a window into community reactions to the Mormons in 1834; however, simply adding the above ten names to those of Hurlbut and Howe will not serve to explain process by which members of that community eventually expelled the majority of the Mormons from Ohio.


More Information from E. D. Howe:

Eber D. Howe appears to again come to the researchers' rescue in his saying: "In 1833 and 34 Grandison Newel Orrin [sic] Clapp Nathan Corning of Mentor and many leading citizens of Kirtland and Geauga Co. employed and defrayed the expenses of Doctor Philastus Hurlbut who had been a Mormon preacher..." to help them discredit and disestablish the LDS leadership at Kirtland. By adding these extra names to the previous list the available information on anti-Mormon responsibility may be increased, but the motives and processes those people used against Mormon leaders like Joseph Smith, Jr. still remain obscure.

There is yet another information provider whose data might be added to that coming form E. D. Howe: James A. Briggs (D. P. Hurlbut's lawyer), in an 1886 article, says: "In the winter of 1833-34, a self constituted committee, consisting of Judge [Nehemiah] Allen, Dr. [George W.] Card, Samuel Wilson, Judge Lapham, W[arren] Corning and myself, met at Mr. Corning's house, in Mentor, now known as the [President] Garfield farm, to investigate Mormonism..." Briggs' list of names overlaps somewhat with the information supplied through E. D. Howe's auspices, and the careful investigator may see some patterns beginning to come clear here. For one thing, the combined list of names contains a number of Ohioans from the early 19th century who were known followers of Alexander Campbell. Sidney Rigdon, who had himself been a Campbellite before converting to Mormonism, blames that religious group for a good deal of the "persecution" the Latter Day Saints experienced in Ohio. For example, he attributes to the Campbellites in his old congregation at Mentor, the support and financial backing that enabled D. Philastus Hurlbut to carry on his 1833-34 efforts against Joseph Smith, Jr. and his family.

So, it seems reasonable to add at this point the names of the known Mentor Campbellites from this same period. An old history book supplies a few of these:

...There was, prior to 1826, a Baptist church in Mentor of a respectable membership. Rev. Warner [sic] Goodall, its worthy pastor, died in June of that year, and Sidney Rigdon, of Mormon memory, conducted the funeral obsequies, and, being an orator of no inconsiderable ability, was eventually secured to supply the place of the deceased pastor. Rigdon is spoken of as being an enthusiast and unstable, of questionable judgment, and little permanent power with the people. In March, 1828, he became an ardent exponent of the doctrine of Alexander Campbell, and, as a consequence, nearly the entire Baptist Church at Mentor became converts to this doctrine. Thus was the Disciple church of Mentor formed, and very soon had a membership of upwards of one hundred. The following is a partial list of those members: B. Blish, E. Nye, O. Clapp, J. Roat, J. Rexford, T. Carroll, A Webster, A. Wilmot, Anson Eggleston, and Osee Matthews, Joseph Curtis, Sylvester Durand, Warren Corning, A. Daniels, S. Miller, E. B. Viall, N. Wirt, David and Daniel Wilson, A. P. Jones, with their wives, and many of their children. The present church was erected in 1858, and cost, entire, about three thousand dollars, There is now no settled pastor...." (History of Geauga and Lake Counties Ohio, pp. 250-51).

And, to this first list of Campbellites, can be added a similar tabulation compiled by Amos Hayden:

"Deacon Benj. Blish, Deacon Ebenezer Nye, Orris Clapp, Jonathan Root, Joel Rexford, Thomas Carroll, Asa Webster, Sidney Rigdon, Deacon Champney, Amos Wilmot, Osee Matthews, Eggleston Matthews, Joseph Curtis, Anson Matthews, Sylvester Durand, ------ Tuttle, Warren Corning, Amos Daniels, Samuel Miller, Ezra B. Viall, Noah Wirt, David Wilson, Danl. Wilson, Alex. P. Jones. To these are to be added, Mrs. Moore, Mrs. Randall, Mrs. Waterman, Mrs. Rexford, Calista M. Lewis, Morgan Lewis (History of the Disciples on the Western Reserve, p. 193).


Yet More From the Painesville Telegraph:

With all the above-listed ant-Mormon names and associations in hand, a few of these people can be looked up in the pages of the Painesville Telegraph. The extracts which follow are merely a very preliminary attempt to do that work -- many more similar extracts could be added:

Card, Dr. George W. 1828 Jan 18 (married)

Crary, Oliver A. 1827 Sep 21 (sheriff sale)

Clapp, Orris 1823: Jan 8 (lost cow), 1824 Jan 22 (ag soc), Nov. 20 (trustee), 1825 Feb 5 (ag soc), 1826 Jan 1 (ag soc), 1827 Jan 26 (ag soc),

Corning, Warren 1823 Jul 9 (po letter) 1824 Jan 22 (ag soc), Apr 8 (ag soc), 1825 Feb 5 (ag soc), Apr 23 (canal), 1826 Jan 1 (ag soc). Sep 8 (election),

Daniels, Amos 1823 May 14 (taxes), 1826 Nov 10 (taxes), 1827 Apr 6 (po let),

Jones, Josiah 1825 Nov 5 (ag soc),1827 Jan 26 (ag soc), 1829 Apr 7 (will)

Morse, John F. 1824 Apr 8 (po letter, Mentor), Jul 24 (married, Kirtland)

Newell, Grandison 1823 Apr 1 (po letter), 1824 Jan 1 (po letter), Apr 8 (ag soc, po let), Jul 10 (po let), 1825 Jan 8 (accounts, po let), Apr 9 (po let.), Apr 16 (ag soc), [many po letters] 1827 Jan 26 (ag soc),

Paine, James H., Esq. 1823 Jan 15 (po let.), Jan 29 (militia), Mar 12 (became lawyer) 1827 Nov 16 (militia) 1828 May 16 (partner with E D Howe), [many other articles & notices]

Wilson, Samuel 1823 Jan 15 (po let. Painesville), 1824 Apr 1 (will, Chagrin), June 3 (taxes)



PART TWO

Clarifying an Image of The Anti-Mormon Committee" of 1833-34.
In the following tabulation, the key members of the Geauga County Anti-Mormon "Committee" of 1833-34 are listed in alphabetical order. The codes attached to their names are:

B = Anti-Mormon mentioned by James A. Briggs
A = Anti-Mormon listed in the Jan. 31, 1834 Announcement
H = Anti-Mormon mentioned by E. D. Howe
C = known Campbellite
w = resident of Willoughby (pre 1834: Chagrin, Cuyahoga)
m = resident of Mentor
k = resident of Kirtland
p = resident of Painesville
? = residence unknown


B _ _ _ w/p Allen, Nehemiah (c. 1780 - aft. 1842)
B _ _ _ w Briggs, James A.
B _ _ _ w Card, Dr.George W.
_ _ H C m Clapp, Orris (1770-1847)
_ A _ C m Corning, Warren, Jr. (1785 - aft. 1834)
B _ H C m Corning, Warren, Sr. (1785 - aft. 1834)
_ _ H C m Corning, Nathan (1794 - aft 1834)
_ A _ _ ? Cornwell, Silvester
_ A _ _ k Crary, Oliver A. (1798-?)
_ A _ C m Daniels, Amos
_ A _ C k Jones, Josiah (c. 1785-aft. 1841)
B _ _ _ w Lapham, Jonathan (c. 1805-?)
_ A _ _ k Martindale, Timothy D. (1795-1859)
_ A _ _ k Morse, John F.
_ _ H _ m Newell, Grandison (1786-1874)
_ A _ _ p Paine, James H., Esq.
_ A _ _ ? Wakefield, Joseph H. (1792-1835)
B A _ _ w Wilson, Samuel

With this tabulation available for consultation, the 1833-34 Geauga Co. anti-Mormons can now be spoken of in greater detail:



PART THREE

Notes on Nehemiah Allen, "Judge" Jonathan Latham, Dr. George W. Card, James A. Briggs, Samuel Wilson, and Silvester Cornwell:
These six gentlemen might best be called "concerned citizens" and political opponents of the Mormons. They lived in Willoughby Twp. (Chagrin Twp. of Cuyahoga Co. until 1834) and were professional men who did not have to deal with the Mormons on a daily basis. Their opposition to the sect was probably based upon moral principal rather than exasperation rising from a close and continual encounter with the new religionists.

The men in this group were probably mostly Whigs -- what the Mormons liked to call "aristocrats" and "federalists." Nehemiah Allen, Esq. supported the second attempt to secure a charter for the Kirtland bank, but his reasons for doing this remain obscure. He may have been on the fringes of anti-Mormonism, and not in its center. The same might be said for Painesville Justice of the Peace William Holbrook, Esq., who attended Hurlbut's anti-Mormon lectures but ostensibly ruled in Joseph Smith's favor when the 1834 Smith vs Hurlbut pre-trial hearing came before him.

NEHEMIAH ALLEN was an associate judge of Cuyahoga county and later a representative to the Ohio Legislature. He is listed in the 1830 Census as a head of a household in Chagrin Twp., Cuyahoga Co., OH. Judge Allen was apparently a member of the Kirtland Safety Society, for his name appears on a Feb. 10, 1837 failed amendment to a bank regulation bill as an associate of Joseph Smith, Jr., Sidney Rigdon, Benjamin Adams, Benjamin Bissel, Horace Kingsbury, Newel K. Whitney, Warren A. Cowdery, Hiram Smith, Oliver Cowdery, H. A. Sharp, and others in that "body corporate" (see Stanley Kimball "Sources of the History of the Mormons in Ohio; 1830-38," BYU Studies, 11:4, summer 1971, p. 532). in the early 1840s Nehemiah Allen joined with Grandison Newell and others to form the "Ohio Railroad" or the "Wellsville Railroad" company. Allen was its president, investors like Newell lost heavily in the project.

JAMES A. BRIGGS was a young law student in Willoughby. He was D. Philastus Hurlbut's lawyer. In later years he was a financial editor for the New York Times.

JONATHAN LAPHAM: The story of Jonathan Lapham (or Latham) remains unknown. He is listed in the 1830 Census as a head of a household in Chagrin Twp., Cuyahoga Co., OH. Possibly he was related to the Latham family of Troy township, or was from Cuyahoga county.

DR. GEORGE W. CARD is listed in the 1830 Census as a head of a household in Chagrin Twp., Cuyahoga Co., OH. He was a prominent Willoughby physician and founder of Willoughby Medical College (now Willoughby-Eastlake Technical Institute).

SILVESTER CORNWELL may possibly have been a distant relative of David Cornwell Patton's mother, Ann Cornwell. More likely he was an associate of one of the Willoughby professional men. A Silvester Cornwell lived in Chagrin Twp., Cuyahoga Co., OH in 1830; that township is adjacent to Euclid and Willoughby. This was probably the same Silvester Cornwell who was born in Connecticut in 1803, married Juliette Roberts there in 1824, and was living near Toledo in 1840/

SAMUEL WILSON: Little is known about Samuel Wilson, except that he was a businessman who lived in Willoughby Twp., Geauga Co., in the 1830s; he is listed in the 1830 Census as a head of a household in Chagrin Twp., Cuyahoga Co., OH. Samuek Wilson may have been an in-law of Grandison Newell and he may have been the same Samuel who was living in Lorain Co., OH in 1840.


PART FOUR

Notes on James H. Paine, Esq. and Joseph H. Wakefield.
These two men have nothing particular in common except that both were anti-Mormons.

JAMES H. PAINE, Esq. was the grand-nephew of Edward Paine, one of the founder of Painesville. The Paine family were pioneer settlers in Geauga county. James was also Grandison Newell's attorney in Newell's 1837 legal battles against Joseph Smith, Jr. In 1828 Paine briefly joined Eber D. Howe on the staff of the Painesville Telegraph. Both men were Whigs and anti-Masons. Paine was Grandison Newell's attorney in his 1837 prosecutions of Smith and Rigdon.

JOSEPH H. WAKEFIELD (1792-1835) was ordained an LDS High Priest on June 3, 1831. He moved to Kirtland in 1833, but soon joined dissident Mormons and ex-Mormons like D. P. Hurlbut and was excommunicated near the end of 1833. Mormon George A. Smith says that Wakefield "headed a mob meeting, and took the lead in bringing about a persecution against the Saints in Kirtland and the regions round about." Wakefield testified at D. P. Hurlbut's Jan. 1834 pre-trial hearing in Painesville but was conspicuously absent from the witness list at Hurlbut's April trial in Chardon. Although Mormon historian Max H. Parkin pairs Wakefield's name with Hurlbut's in pointing out the most threatening anti-Mormons, he provides no information on Wakefield's activities. Joseph H. Wakefield died in 1835 at Willoughby, Ohio under suspicious circumstances.


PART FIVE

Notes on Orris Clapp, Esq., the Cornings, Amos Daniels, and Josiah Jones.
All of these men were anti-Mormon Campbellites who lived in Mentor.

WARREN CORNING built the first distillery in Kirtland. Little is known about his sons, Warren Jr. and Nathan, except that both were Whigs and active anti-Mormons. All three men are listed in the 1830 Census as heads of households in Kirtland Twp.

AMOS DANIELS, like the Cornings, was a member of Rigdon's old congregation at Mentor. Daniels is listed in the 1830 Census as the head of a household in Kirtland Twp.; his name appears close to that of Nathan Corning in the census record.

ORRIS CLAPP, Esq. became a religious enemy of Sidney Rigdon when Rigdon converted to Mormonism. Although not an ordained minister, Clapp and his family helped hold the decimated Mentor Campbellites together, after some defected to Rigdon's Kirtland congregation. The Clapp family assisted Thomas and Alexander Campbell in their 1831 crusades against Mormonism in the Western Reserve and "Judge" Orris Clapp helped finance D. P. Hurlbut's excursions to the East during the fall of 1833 and apparently had a falling out with the man when he returned to live briefly in Mentor in 1836-37. After Rev. Rigdon's defection to the Mormons, Orris Clapp's son, Matthew S. Clapp, essentially replaced the lost minister in the Mentor church.

A man who must have known Orris Clapp was Elias Randall of Mentor. Randall was the brother-in-law of Nathan and Warren Jr. Corning, and so very likely a Campbellite himself. He listed in the 1830 Census as a heads of a households in Mentor Twp.. In the census record his name appears on the next page after the one with Orris Callp's name. Elder Benjamin Winchester tells the same :woman trap" story of Hurlbut and his wife with Randall as Sidney Rigdon tells of them with Clapp.

JOSIAH JONES appears to have been a natural born clerk and correspondent. Jones was the first clerk of Kirtland township when it was created in 1818. He was also the township's first school teacher (History of Geauga and Lake Counties Ohio, pp. 246-47). He was elected to the town clerk position again in 1830. In 1833 Jones became a Justice of the Peace in Kirtland township, the position he appears to have been holding when he subscribed his name to the Jan. 31, 1834 "To the Public" notice in the Painesville Telegraph. John C. Dowen and Alpheus C. Russell are also on record as being Justices of the Peace in Kirtland in 1833. Perhaps neither served a full term. Josiah continued on his magistrate's position in 1834 and he must have been little loved by the Kirtland Mormons. Whether or not Josiah continued as Justice of the Peace in 1835 is unclear, but if he did, he was ousted by 1836 when F. G. Williams became one of the first Mormons to serve in an important township office in Kirtland.

Following Josiah's subscribing his name to the "To the Public" notice, his next entry into public anti-Mormonism came at the end of November, 1833, when he forwarded a clipping with Orson Hyde's eyewitness account of Mormon tribulation in Missouri to D. P. Hurlbut in Palmyra, New York. Hurlbut retrieved the letter from the Palmyra Post Office and handed over the clipping to the editor of the Wayne Sentinel for reprinting in his Dec. 6, 1833 issue. In that process Jones' name was mentioned in the introduction to the reprint. As a front-lines fighter in the cold war against Mormonism, Jones was no doubt eager to hear back from Hurlbut and had contacted him at Palmyra, knowing that the anti-Mormon researcher would be in that place by the end of November. Joseph Smith prayed that God would soften Josiah Jones; heart on Feb. 28, 1834 (Joseph Smith Jourmal).

Years later, when Jones had moved to the Campbellite stronghold of Cincinnati, he gave Walter Scott an account of early Mormonism in Ohio for the June, 1841 number Scott's Evangelist of the True Gospel. The account appears to have been taken from a late 1830 entry in Josiah's personal journal. If so, the original has not survived, nor does the printed article refer to Jones' role as one of the original anti-Mormons in Kirtland.


PART SIX

Notes on Oliver A. Crary, Timothy D. Martindale, John F. Morse and Grandison Newell.
These four men may be grouped together as being "old settlers" in Mentor and Kirtland townships, anti-Mormons, though not Campbellites. If Josiah Jones is thought of as the point man of the anti-Mormons in Kirtland during the 1830s, these associates of his were still very much part of the front lines foot soldiers in that same cause.

OLIVER AUGUSTUS CRARY (1798-?) operated the first retail sales in Kirtland, well prior to N. K. Whitney opening his store there in 1823. The Crary family were the first settlers in Kirtland. Christopher Gore Crary, Jr. (1806-c.1895), was Oliver's brother and the author of the 1893 Pioneer and Personal Reminiscences, a book which eye-witness accounts of numerous early Geauga county residents. Oliver does not seem to have been a dedicated merchant and he established no store of his own in the township. Oliver was a charter member of the Mentor Library Company, the articles of association of which were drawn up in Jan 1819, just a few months after Kirtland was split off from its parent township of Mentor. Oliver apparently lived in the southern part of the original township, and thus ended up being a resident of Kirtland after 1818. Oliver served as town clerk in Kirtland between the spring of 1833 and the spring of 1834, and it was while holding this office that he subscribed his name to the Jan. 31, 1834 "To the Public" notice in the Painesville Telegraph. Oliver was not re-elected to office again in Kirtland during the Mormon stay there, and it is likely that was due his having been a member of the anti-Mormon "committee" during the winter of 1833-34.

JOHN F. MORSE was on old settler and a life-long associate of the Crary family. His sister married Christopher, the brother of Oliver A. Crary. The Craries and Morses were Presbyterians and lived in southeast Kirtland township. John F. Morse appears on the 1829 list of township officers as a road supervisor. During the following three years he served as one of Kirtland's three Trustees. He was also a Geauga County Commissioner during 1831. In the years of the Mormon rise to political power in Kirtland, Morse's name disappeared from the list of Kirtland town officers, but in April of 1838 he was again elected to his old position of Trustee. It is likely that Morse's subscribing his name to the Jan. 31, 1834 "To the Public" notice in the Painesville Telegraph deprived him from filling an office in Kirtland from 1834 to 1837. Still, that does not explain his absence from among the town officers in 1833.

Both John F. Morse and his father, John Morse, Sr., apparently had problems relating to the Kirtland Mormons: "Colonel John Morse, brother of Harvey, applied to me for a writ against Jo[e] Smith for an assault. Jo[e] begged me not to issue a writ against him." (Kirtland J. P. John C. Dowen's Statement)

TIMOTHY D. MARTINDALE was elected as one of Kirtland township's 18 road supervisors in April of 1832. The following year he relinquished that responsibility, but was back among the township officers again as both a road supervisor and one of the Overseers of the Poor following the 1835 election.

Timothy D. Martindale extended credit to Joseph Smith, Jr. on Oct. 11, 1836 in a Kirtland land purchase and $5,037 of the original loan remained unpaid upon its Jan. 1, 1837 due date. Martindale swore out a complaint against Smith in January of 1837 and had Smith arrested on Feb. 22, 1837, less than a week after the Mormon leader returned from Monroe, Michigan, where he had purchased the Bank of Monroe. Smith and Martingdale settled the unpaid debt out of court, presumably very shortly after Smith's arrest. It is not unlikely that Smith paid off the balance to Martindale in Bank of Monroe bank notes.

Martindale was again elected to a road supervisor position in the April 1837 election. In that year the Mormons won practically all the important elected positions in the township. In 1838 the situation was reserved, with "reformer" Mormons taking a few offices and non-Mormons regaining all but one of the other elected positions in the township. In 1838 Martindale was made the Treasurer of Kirtland. The fact that Martindale was out of office in 1836 and held only a minor position in 1837 appears to indicate that he was not supported by the LDS voters after his foreclosure upon Joseph Smith in February of 1837. Given the fact that Martindale was one of the signers of the Jan. 31, 1834 "To the Public" anti-Mormon notice in the Painesville Telegraph, it is difficult to account for his trusting Joseph Smith for a loan of several thousand dollars on Oct. 11, 1836. Perhaps Martindale extended the land sale credit as a kind of bait, by which he could lure the practically insolvent Smith into an unforeseen legal battle. If so, Martindale would have been simply continuing to apply the same kind of financial and legal pressure against Smith as his neighbor, Grandison Newell was then exerting.

In August 1838 Martindale became a trustee of Asa Lord's Western Reserve Teacher's Seminary, an early educators' academy which began in the Kirtland Temple. Oliver Cowdery was its secretary during its first year of operations.

GRANDISON NEWELL (1786-1874) The following excerpts are from the History of Geauga and Lake Counties Ohio:

"Grandison Newell was a native of Connecticut, but was residing in New York at the time of his emigration to Ohio. He settled in the township in 1819. he jointly, with Chester Hart, purchased the farm known as the "Newell farm." They were subsequently associated together in the manufacture of the "Wright patent" cast-iron plow, the first cast plow manufactured on the Reserve. Mr. Newell was a man of enterprise. On the east branch of the Chagrin river, in Kirtland, he built a chair factory and a saw-mill, which furnished employment to a large number of men. He was a determined enemy of the Mormons, and did much to bring about their removal from Kirtland; was prominently identified with many public and private enterprises. He became wealthy, but eventually lost heavily by investments in the Fairport and Wellsville Railroad." (p. 250).

"In about 1821 a "pocket-furnace" was established on the lot now owned by David Beals, in the southern portion of Mentor. Grandison Newell and Chester Hart were the founders and it cast the first plows on the Reserve. At first the building was of logs, but in the year 1926 this was torn down and a substantial frame building erected. In addition to plows, they cast an immense number of clock-bells. These were shipped to Winsted, Connecticut, and were used in the extensive clock-manufactory of Riley Whiting at that point. The "foundry" was in operation twenty-five years. [1821-1846] In the year 1829 a chair factory was put in operation near the foundry, by Grandison Newell. Subsequently, Fairchild Smith became a partner. they continued in business fifteen years, the business assuming huge proportion for that day. Other parties came in possession of it, and after some twelve years' longer continuance the enterprise ceased...." )p. 251).

"[In 1837-38] when the members of the [Mormon] church failed to harmonize, the finances at a low ebb, and demoralization imminent, Grandison Newell -- who, by the way, was ever a "thorn in the side" of the fanatics -- again appeared on the scene, and by divers legal prosecutions at least obtained a judgment against the church, and, in default of payment, the temple, the pride and hope of so many faithful hearts, was put up at auction, and sold to Newell for the inconsiderable sum of one hundred and fifty dollars. Their printing office was burned. the members went from ill to worse..." (p. 248).

The "Newell Farm" was apparently located straddling the current Kirtland-Mentor township line, about 3 miles northeast of the Kirtland Temple. Timothy Martingdale and Chester Hart were presumably Newell's nearest neighbors, with Martindale and Hart probably owning land both in Mentor and Kirtland townships. Martindale appears to have owned the land through which Chillicothe Road passes, just before entering Mentor township. Hart may have owned property on both sides of the Kirtland-Mentor boundary, where Mentor Road crosses the line. Backman places the Newell sawmill on the east branch of the Chagrin river, just west of the Chardon township line and less than a mile east of the intersection of Booth and Sperry roads. (Heavens Resound, p. 72 map). Newell's "foundry" was located in Mentor township, about two miles northeast of the sawmill.

Although Grandison Newell had extensive business dealings in Kirtland and along the Kirtland-Mentor boundary, he apparently lived all his life on the Newell Farm, just barely inside the southern Mentor line. Not being a resident of Kirtland, Newell was never an office-holder there and was unable to exert direct political pressure against the Mormons. Although he helped finance D. P. Hurlbut's 1833 excursion to New York and Massachusetts, Newell's name does not appear on the Jan 31, 1834 "To the Public" notice in the Painesville Telegraph. Probably this was by design. Newell seems to have relished fighting the Mormon expansion in Geauga county by working through surrogates like Samuel D. Rounds.

When the Kirtland bank opened in January 1837, Newell sensed that the new financial firm did not have enough gold and silver coins on hand to redeem very many of its bank notes. If he could force the unchartered Mormon bank into a situation where it refused to redeem a significant amount of its own bank notes, Newell stood a good chance of seeing Kirtland Safety Society managers punished for illegal banking. James Thompson, one of Newell's employees, explains how the Mentor businessman began his attack upon the Mormon establishment: "I worked for Grandison Newell considerable. He used to drive about the country and buy up all the Mormon money possible, and the next morning go to the bank and obtain the specie. When they stopped payment he prosecuted them and closed the bank." (Arthur B. Deming's Naked Truths About Mormonism, Vol. I. No. 2 April, 1888)

Grandison Newell's assault upon the Mormon bank appears to have commenced even before the firm opened its doors in Kirtland on Monday, Jan. 9, 1837. The bank's elegantly engraved notes were first made available as currency on Friday, Jan 6. On that Friday, Wilfred Woodruff wrote in his Journal: "I visited the office of the Kirtland Safety Society & saw the first money that was issued by the Treasurer or Society it was given to Brother Bump (in exchange for other notes) who was the first to Circulate it..." But Elder Jacob Bump was not the only person with the new Kirtland money in his pockets that weekend. Daniel Burnam Hart of Mentor later recalled that "He happened to be in Kirtland the Saturday evening preceding the Monday morning on which the bank was first opened for business, and, having a debt against some of the chief Mormon worthies, was, upon requesting payment, proferred one of the new Mormon ten-dollar bank-bills." Daniel probably took the note back to Mentor and showed it to his family and friends.

The following Monday morning Daniel took the note to the bank office when it opened for business, and "finding it impossible to use it for any legitimate commercial ends, he presented it to the officers of the bank, demanding its redemption..." The "officers" (Smith and Rigdon) refused to redeem the note for gold or silver coin and Hart "threatened them with the law." Finally, some other person in the bank offered him a note of legal tender and Daniel accepted the trade. (History of Geauga and Lake Counties Ohio, p. 248). The dogged drive behind Daniel's efforts to redeem the bill as quickly as possible comes clear when it is revealed that he was Chester Hart's younger brother. Chester Hart had been Grandison Newell's key business partner since 1821. Newell had no doubt used young Daniel to test the redeemability of the Kirtland notes as soon as they became available. And he had learned that the bank was not prepared to hand out even ten dollars in specie without an argument. All Newell had to do to challenge the Mormon bank operation was to round up a few hundred dollars in the new bank notes, present them for legal currency, and then file a law suit against Rigdon and Smith when they refused the obligation. And that is exactly what he did.

After waiting through some delays and a pre-trial hearing, Grandison Newell finally obtained a jury trial against Smith and Rigdon under a seldom-cited 1816 Ohio banking statute. Had the Kirtland Safety Society's notes passed the test of legal currency, Newell may have not received the judgment he wanted in the prosecution. But the Mormon bank was unable to redeem its notes for specie on a regular basis and that fact assured Newell of a victory in the case. Smith and Rigdon were both fined $1000 for illegal banking in the court judgment and Newell was awarded half of that sum by the State as a bonus for bringing his charges to fruition. Amazingly Smith and Rigdon refused to pay the settlement. They had petitioned for a re-trial on the basis of appeal. But that did not relieve them of their current obligation to pay the $2000 in fines, pending the outcome of the appeal case. In allowing the fines to remain unpaid Smith and Rigdon opened themselves up to an expropriation of their property and a sheriff's sale to liquidate that property in order to raise the demanded $2000. That is exactly what happened on Monday, Jan. 15, 1838. The Geauga county Sheriff took legal possession of the titles to the LDS Church's Kirtland Temple and the Office Building which stood immediately west of the Temple. An auction of the properties was conducted and the Temple sold for less than $200. Enough money was apparently collected in the auction to satisfy the financial demands of the court. Whether Grandison Newell received his $1000 is unclear, but former LDS Seventy Nathaniel Milliken (1793-1874) seems to have ended up with the Office Building and the Elders' Journal print shop it housed. (Hepziba Richards letter of January 18, 1838. in Kenneth W. Godfrey, et al., Women's Voices...1982). Milliken had been excommunicated, along with Warren Parrish and others, by a special meeting of the Quorums of the Seventies on Jan. 7, 1838.

The printing office burned to the ground a few hours later and the Church regained a tenuous hold upon the Kirtland Temple for a time, but Grandison had won his victory against Smith and Rigdon, their defunct bank, and their effective leadership over the Mormons remaining in Geauga county.

As Milton V. Backman, Jr. says:

One reason that some of the pressures exerted before 1837 failed was because the enemy lacked information that could be used in a court of law to incriminate Church leaders. As apostasy increased within the Church, vexatious law suits multiplied. Apostates undoubtedly provided the old enemy with information that could be used to substantiate charges that might have led to convictions [[30. Grandison Newell, who operated a chair and cabinet factory near the banks of the East Branch of the Chagrin River, was one of the leading opponents of Mormonism in the Western Reserve. He instigated legal proceedings against Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon for issuing unauthorized bank money. A judgment of $I,000 for each of these leaders was obtained and half of the money was given to Newell. Grandison Newell, however, claimed that he spent more than a $1,000 in law suits against Mormon leaders. He further claimed that he was assisted by Mormon dissidents, the "most effective and reliable" informer being one of the early leaders of that religious movement. Henry Holcomb, Scrapbook, pp. 48-53; Henry Holcomb, "Personal and Family History," pp. 384-86. See also the Grandison Newell file, Lake County Historical Society and Elizabeth G. Hitchcock, "Grandison Newell, A Born Trader," 10 (May 1968):1-4. end30]] (Milton V. Backman, Jr., "Flight from Kirtland" in Milton V. Backman, Jr. (ed.) Regional Studies in LDS History Series: Ohio Provo: BYU 1990, p. 148). Note: Henry Holcomb was the administrator of the Joseph Smith, Jr. estate in Lake County, Ohio in the early 1870s.

See also 2 page statement by A. G. Riddle on Judge Reuben Hitchcock (who was Geauga Co. Prosecutor for most of the years between 1828 and 1837, and who prosecuted the 1837 illegal banking charges indictment against Smith and Rigdon) and the 1837 State of Ohio vs Joseph Smith trial for conspiracy to murder Grandison Newell, no date, original in Lake County Historical Society,


PART SEVEN

The Beginnings of Kirtland Anti-Mormonism.
Writers of Mormon history have long recognized that an informed explanation of anti-Mormonism in Ohio still needs to be compiled and set forth for future students of this subject. Historians like Max H. Parkin, Marvin S. Hill, and Milton V. Backman have all struggled with this problem in recent decades, but none have gone much beyond simply fine-tuning the old LDS traditions of undue "persecution" and unfair treatment at the hands of non-Mormons. In a c. 1992 unpublished paper Backman and two associates laid some of the necessary groundwork for establishing a new understanding of the Mormons' troubles in interacting with the people on the Ohio Western Reserve during the Kirtland era in latter Day Saint History. This seldom-cited paper is entitled "An Antebellum Community Transformed: The Mormons at Kirtland, Ohio, 1830-1850. Its content is heavy on the raw data side and rather light on the analytical portion; still, it is provides a starting point for the task of understanding and explaining Kirtland era anti-Mormonism.

One theme that the three authors return to several times is the disparity of socio-economic levels between the mass of Mormon concerts who flocked into Kirtland and the previous settlers of the area. For the most part the Mormon converts were much poorer and had far fewer resources at their command then did their non-Mormon neighbors. The society of the Western Reserve was largely that of an earlier period in New England, transplanted to the western frontier, It was a society of rugged individualism moderated by a tradition of strong community spirit and town meeting style local government. In short, it was a society in which the needs of individuals and families greatly impacted the entire community. And multitudes of poor Mormon converts huddled together on a few hundred acres of rural farmland were not a welcome addition to the landscape, no matter what their religious beliefs might be.

The very idealism that gave rise to the Mormon gathering provided the growing mass of converts with an immediate difference in views from those of their non-Mormon neighbors. The Mormon pre-millennialism then in full vogue called for building and making room for a great celestialized city of refuge -- a metropolis containing thousands (if not hundreds of thousands) of inhabitants, all marching to a single drum beat. The Gentile neighbors of the Kirtland Mormons soon came to realize that the physical expansion of Mormonism in Kirtland township would be carried forth mostly at the expense of the old settlers. The prior residents would be expected to either join the Mormons or to sell their lands at the beginning of an upward spiraling of real estate values driven by the continual influx of new converts. Sooner or later the Mormons would occupy all the useable land in Kirtland, whether they had fully paid for it or not. And sooner or later the increase in population of same-thinking people would create a political situation in which the Mormons would be able to control the outcomes of all local elections.


Non-Mormons as a Source of Tension in Kirtland
The 1830 Federal Census of Ohio shows 162 families living in Kirtland Township, only five or six of which converted to Mormonism at the end of that same year. Several of these non-Mormons became active anti-Mormons during the early 1830s. For example, the Kirtland Mormons were so unhappy with the reaction of Gentile Justice of the Peace Ariel Hanson to their sect, that 70 of them signed a petition demanding Hanson's removal from office ("Petition of Joseph Smith Jr. to Ariel Hanson," dated Nov. 7, 1836, original in Lake County Historical Society, Mentor, Ohio).

Another example may be taken from Joseph Smith's personal journal entry for Jan. 28, 1834, in which he prayed for God's intervention against the efforts of Austin Loud, Andrew Bardsly, Elijah Smith, and Josiah Jones -- all were non-Mormon Kirtland land owners and the latter two were listed as heads of households in Kirtland in the 1830 Census. Elijah Smith acted as one of D. P. Hurlbut's surities in the bond he posted with the Chardon court in April 1834; while Josiah Jones corresponded with Hurlbut during his 1833 trip to Palmyra. The other man who joined Elijah Smith in putting up a money for Hurlbut's April 1834 Court bond was Charles A. Holmes; he served as a road supervisor in Kirtland during 1832 and 1834. Holmes apparently sold land in Kirtland to Joseph Smith in 1831, but by 1837 Smith had failed to pay a due balance of nearly $10,000. Holmes challenged Smith in court and took back his land.


Mormon "Apostates," an Additional Burden on the Township
As if all of this were not enough the raise the ire of the old settlers, Mormonism had the strange side-effect of spinning off numerous disgruntled "apostates" -- former members who had invested their all in the new social order and then decided to abandon the faith. Such offspring of the main LDS movement were a danger to the surrounding community, which could not simply absorb a continual stream of penniless cast-offs carrying major chips on their shoulders. If Backman and his research associates keep coming back to the theme of Mormon poverty at Kirtland in their paper, it is only because that was the reality of the situation in the early 1830s and a potential problem which must have been on just about every person's mind who lived in the region of the Mormon boom.

Not only were these new multitudes of converts a scanty resource for taxation, they threatened to consume the small reserves of the surrounding community in their own needs for food, shelter, sanitation, transportation, and township services. In the days prior to October 21, 1833 the elected township officers had seen enough of the Mormons and they acted in unison to meet the growing problem by attempting to force the removal of the fanatical paupers. This attempt at expulsion was carried out by the township officers empowering Kirtland's Overseer of the Poor, Roswell D. Cotterill, to serve a legal writ upon a total of 49 Mormon families, warning them that the township would no longer provide them with any special services, no matter how urgent their needs. Essentially the entire Mormon colony was warned to "get out of town." Although the Kirtland officers decided to use this method in mid-October, they were slow in expediting the order; the writ was not served upon most of the unwanted Latter Day Saints until December 20.

The township officers' delay in serving the "warning out of town" writ probably arose from several different factors. The officers had been unhurried in arriving at their decision in the first place. Unless such undesirables could simultaneously be found guilty of substantial crimes, the "warning out of town" was not enforceable by physical expulsion. In order for the writ to have its desired effect practically the entire non-Mormon community in and around Kirtland had to unite in shunning and boycotting the LDS undesirables. A similar warning issued to Sidney Rigdon, F. G. Williams and John Whitmer at the beginning of 1831 failed in its intended effect. Obviously old settler Mormon converts like F. G. Williams and N. K. Whitney retained a few friends among the local population who were not ready to apply draconian methods to guarantee their banishment from the township. In order to work the way it was intended, the warning out of town" writ had to be accompanied by a broadcasting of the Mormons' improprieties and their alleged pernicious effect upon the Kirtland community. The Kirtland township officers probably spent most of November and the first part of December just verifying the residences of the 49 targeted Mormon families. At the same time they worked to drum up support within the community for the mass exclusion and to document the Saints' purported transgressions.

Faced with a fast increasing Mormon population inhabiting but a slowly increasing patch of holy ground, the old residents sought innovative ways to publicize their contempt for the unwanted strangers in their midst. One idea that must have occurred to many of the old settlers early on, was that the Mormon gathering might be greatly impacted if the characters those who controlled the process could be discredited beyond any hope of rehabilitation. In the case of Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon this idea called for showing them to be something much less than divinely inspired "prophets, seers, and revelators."

In the past anti-Mormons like the Painesville newspaper publisher Eber D. Howe had waged their private campaigns to discredit the Mormon leaders. But Howe's passing along hostile stories of the Mormon Smith family from old Palmyra newspapers had accomplished little in halting the Mormon tide in Geauga county. Howe's printing of articles like the adverse accounts penned by Ezra Booth may have had some minor effect in limiting local conversions, but they had provided no insurance against the continual inpouring of LDS converts with origins outside of the Ohio Western Reserve. Clearly the Kirtland town officers could not simply circulate those old stories and hope they would provide enough evidence against the Mormons to empower the 1833 warnings out of town. Luckily for the old residents, at that very same time ex-Mormons like D. Philastus Hurlbut and Joseph H. Wakefield were beginning to publicize some very real flaws in the claim of Joseph Smith, Jr. to be a virtuous holy man.


PART EIGHT

Reflections on the Rise of Geauga County Anti-Mormonism.
In the c. 1992 unpublished paper by Backman, et al, the following is found on page 102:

"After the "Warning-out" of October 1833 failed to discourage Mormon immigration, local leaders met, expressed their grievances, and identified that which they considered to be the negative consequences of the Mormon migration to Kirtland. Early in 1834 this committee consisting of some of the largest land owners in Kirtland concluded that the "impoverished" Mormons "alienated" the affections of other settlers, injured the town;s reputation, inhibited more permanent settlers from locating there and threatened the older settlers with an "insupportable weight of pauperism."

Backman has come to essentially the correct conclusions here, but has failed to understand the sequence of events leading up to the publication of the Jan. 31, 1834 "To the Public" notice in the Painesville Telegraph.

Ever since Sidney Rigdon's baptism into Mormonism on Nov. 8, 1830, there had been an anti-Mormon backlash evinced among the Mentor and Kirtland Campbellites who resisted following their pastor into the new religion. But, up until the latter part of 1833, this backlash appears to have been mostly a defensive action directed at salvaging the Mentor church. Except for a few resistant individuals like Josiah Jones, the Kirtland Campbellites were lost to Mormonism by January of 1831. The Kirtland town officers' ineffectual warning out of town served upon Sidney Rigdon, F. G. Williams and John Whitmer that same month shows that the local Campbellites and the Kirtland government had a common goal as early as the beginning of that year. But nothing came of that early attempt at cooperation in expelling a few Mormon individuals. However, in the fall of 1833, the Mentor Campbellites and the Kirtland town officers were ready to work together in attempting to expell the entire LDS colony. Josiah Jones, the Campbellite Justice of the Peace in Kirtland, was a key player in this new cooperative project.

Jones was almost certainly a Whig in his political sentiments. The new party was just then coming together out of an amalgam of various anti-Jacksonian partisans, so he may not have identified himself by that name as early as 1833, but he must have been numbered among their ranks. So also were other anti-Mormon Campbellites in the area, like the Corning family of Mentor, and probably also the Clapp family. Near the end of 1833 the anti-Mormon associates of Josiah Jones included also a prominent non-Campbellite and Whig, Grandison Newell of Mentor. Businessman Newell does not appear to have been a close friend of any of his Campbellite neighbors, but he found common ground with them and the Kirtland town officers in opposing the growth of Mormonism in Geauga county. Through the cooperation of men like Orris Clapp, the Cornings, and Grandison Newell, Josiah Jones was able to forge a much-needed alliance between the Kirtland town council and other anti-Mormons in the area. It is not likely that there was any one permanent leader of the ad hoc "committee" then coming together, but it must have involved an ongoing collaboration between Josiah Jones and Grandison Newell.

It is this incipient anti-Mormon alliance, in place weeks before the "Warning-out" of October 1833, which Backman has failed to account for. Perhaps the "committee" did not meet as a single body until after October 1833, but certain of its members were at work, engineering the hoped-for Mormon expulsion, as early as September of that same year.


From the Mormon point of view the Kirtland Town Council's warning them out of town at the end of 1833 could not have come at a worse time. With development of their planned "New Jerusalem" on the Missouri frontier then in great jeopardy, the Mormons decided to make Kirtland a much more permanent place of residence than they had envisioned it being only a few months before. With the commencement of the construction of the Kirtland Temple in the summer of 1833 and the installation of a new printing press later that same year, the Mormons were showing that they intended to stay and Kirtland and expand their operations there. Not only were they unwilling and unable to move out of town, they had to prepare to a possible influx of refugees returning from the failed promised land in Jackson county, Missouri.

In the Township election of 1834 the Saints, by cooperating closely with the Jacksonian voting minority, were able to place a few of their men among the town officers. The non-Jacksonian, non-Mormons took affront to this development and worked hard the following year to see that their votes were not divided, By a small majority every single Mormon who ran for office in the township was defeated. This setback was not well taken by the Mormons. In the following months they leap into partisan politics with a vengeance, both on the township and county levels. They established a Democratic newspaper, worked closely with non-Mormon Jacksonians, and begin to win political races in Geauga county. So long as Joseph Smith could count upon an ever increasing number of loyal, bloc-voting Latter Day Saints to take up residence in Kirtland, the Mormon social machine appeared to be upon an unstoppable roll. Only financial and/or religious problems might slow its progress after the Mormon political victory of 1837. And, strangely enough, that is exactly what happened. Thus the stage was set for a running battle between the Kirtland Mormons and their Gentile neighbors.






Uncle Dale
_mentalgymnast

Re: When did Gad Stafford move to Auburn?

Post by _mentalgymnast »

marg wrote:
mentalgymnast wrote:One does have to accept the possibility of divine intervention/involvement though.

Regards,
MG


Not so MG, one doesn't have to accept the supernatural. If I see a magic trick and don't understand it, I don't assume the supernatural, I only assume there is a natural explanation.


MG: same here. I'm sure you would agree, however, that the sleight of hand necessary to perform a card trick or magician's "magic" is of a different kind/species than that required for Joseph Smith to fool/dupe witnesses to his prophetic "abilities" or revelatory "powers". A magician's sleight of hand can be explained by showing the trickery use to dupe his audience. Vogel, the Unc and others have,as of yet, not been able to comprehensively lay out how trickery explains everything in regards to Joseph Smith's production of the Book of Mormon, although they both are on the same page inasmuch as they can't accept any other alternative for Joseph Smith's accomplishments other than trickery of one form or another.

The really tricky thing is, of course, that with our five senses and our natural mind we are hard pressed to differentiate between trickery and sleight of hand orgininating from pure physicality and what is or could be supernatural/metaphysical occurrences and/or operations. This has always been a dilemma. This is why the Book of Mormon is so important. It provides a purported connection between the spiritual and physical worlds. An artifact from worlds/times gone by. It can be dissected/handled to see if that is indeed what it is. Great minds have attempted to prove that the Book of Mormon is not a connection between God and man...but without success to this point.

Best efforts notwithstanding.

Regards,
MG
_Uncle Dale
_Emeritus
Posts: 3685
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 7:02 am

Re: When did Gad Stafford move to Auburn?

Post by _Uncle Dale »

mentalgymnast wrote:
MG: same here. I'm sure you would agree, however, that the sleight of hand necessary to perform a card trick or magician's "magic" is of a different kind/species than that required for Joseph Smith to fool/dupe witnesses to his prophetic "abilities" or revelatory "powers". A magician's sleight of hand can be explained by showing the trickery use to dupe his audience. Vogel, the Unc and others have,as of yet, not been able to comprehensively lay out how trickery explains everything in regards to Joseph Smith's production of the Book of Mormon, although they both are on the same page inasmuch as they can't accept any other alternative for Joseph Smith's accomplishments other than trickery of one form or another.



I do not know whether you are aquainted with any members of the of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
(Strangite), but I am. In fact, I have a big pile of old newspaper articles loanded to me by one such member, which I
keep forgetting to scan and return to him. Another prominent Strangite is the fellow who has all of the images of the
1830 Book of Mormon on the web.

At any rate, whether you know any or not, were you to meet them and begin discussing their religion with them, they
would point to the impossibility of Elder Strang having faked his discovery of their brass plates -- an ancient record
uncovered in Wisconsin -- with several witnesses present at the time. Led to the wilderness spot by divine revelation,
Elder Strang stood by as the plates were dug up from deep within the earth, entangled in the centuries old growth of
ancient tree roots, in what could not have been a hoax or a fake. Or at least the Strangites will relate those holy events
to you, and provide you with copies of the witnesses' documented testimony -- testimony that they say Strang's
witnesses never denied, not even upon their deaths, (though one of them never joined his church).

If you ever have an opportunity to speak with any of these members, they may relate to you their God-given testimony,
in which each of them have been informed by personal revealtion that Strang's scriptures, received from plates and by
by direct revelation, are true -- that he was a true prophet -- and that his church is the one true church and the remnant
of his priesthood is the one true priesthood, never again to be taken from the earth.

The Strangites have a latter day church with signs and wonders folllowing. They proclaim the gifts of the spirit among
them, including miraculous healings from priesthood administrations -- speaking and interpretation of tongues --
visions -- continuing revelation -- continued visitations of John the Revelator and the Three Nephites -- and the abiding
presence of the Holy Ghost following their laying on of hands by the elders at confirmation.

Strang wrote one of the most intelligent and informed refutation of the Spalding-Rigdon authorship claims for the Book of Mormon
published during the early years of Mormonism. He obviously prayed and studied very diligently in producing what his
followers proclaim to be an inspired rebuttal to those authorship allegations.

So -- was the Prophet, Seer, Revelator and Translator, President James J. Strang any more or less of a "trickster"
than was Joe Smith?

UD
_marg

Re: When did Gad Stafford move to Auburn?

Post by _marg »

mentalgymnast wrote:
MG: same here. I'm sure you would agree, however, that the sleight of hand necessary to perform a card trick or magician's "magic" is of a different kind/species than that required for Joseph Smith to fool/dupe witnesses to his prophetic "abilities" or revelatory "powers". A magician's sleight of hand can be explained by showing the trickery use to dupe his audience.


Not all tricks get explained. So if not, one is left with attempting to figure it out. But we all know from past experiences of observations, discussion with others that magicians don't employ the supernatural. However there still are some people who are credulous and believe in the supernatural rather than appreciating natural explanations.

Vogel, the Unc and others have,as of yet, not been able to comprehensively lay out how trickery explains everything in regards to Joseph Smith's production of the Book of Mormon, although they both are on the same page inasmuch as they can't accept any other alternative for Joseph Smith's accomplishments other than trickery of one form or another.


Well they've each evaluated the evidence and have come to different views., which don't employ supernatural explanations.

The really tricky thing is, of course, that with our five senses and our natural mind we are hard pressed to differentiate between trickery and sleight of hand orgininating from pure physicality and what is or could be supernatural/metaphysical occurrences and/or operations.


I have no problem that when it comes to affairs such as this, elaborate cons, there is an explanation which doesn't go beyond the laws of nature we all understand.

This has always been a dilemma. This is why the Book of Mormon is so important. It provides a purported connection between the spiritual and physical worlds.


The Book of Mormon is a piece of evidence which may or may not help determine how the con was carried out. When you can prove "the spiritual" to an objective skeptical audience who can verify what you claim then your statement above regarding "spiritual and physical" will make sense. Until then your statement is nonsense in the sense that the word "spiritual" is a function of a product of the mind but not a reality objectively verifiable.

An artifact from worlds/times gone by.


I'm sorry MG I'm not that credulous.

It can be dissected/handled to see if that is indeed what it is. Great minds have attempted to prove that the Book of Mormon is not a connection between God and man...but without success to this point.


MG you have it wrong. The burden of proof has always been on the church, and its claims to the Book of Mormon being historical, to God interfering, to plates containing an ancient record, to J Smith being chosen by some god, to later prophets being divinely guided. And to date they've not met their burden of proof to objective, skeptical investigators. The claims are simply truth assertions absent verifiable evidence. Those claims are therefore pretty much ignored by most of the world, including great minds who have not been indoctrinated into this particular christian sect.
_mentalgymnast

Re: When did Gad Stafford move to Auburn?

Post by _mentalgymnast »

Uncle Dale wrote:...the Strangites will relate those holy events
to you, and provide you with copies of the witnesses' documented testimony -- testimony that they say Strang's
witnesses never denied, not even upon their deaths, (though one of them never joined his church).

If you ever have an opportunity to speak with any of these members, they may relate to you their God-given testimony,
in which each of them have been informed by personal revealtion that Strang's scriptures, received from plates and by
by direct revelation, are true -- that he was a true prophet -- and that his church is the one true church and the remnant
of his priesthood is the one true priesthood, never again to be taken from the earth.

So -- was the Prophet, Seer, Revelator and Translator, President James J. Strang any more or less of a "trickster"
than was Joe Smith?

UD


MG: good question. Either both were tricksters... or one of them was, but not both. That is, based on the assumption that God called one of the two to do his work. How would one know? In the New Testament Jesus said that "by their fruits ye shall know them". I don't have Strangites in my circle of associates, but I do have a question for you. In Strang's revelations we read:

6. And then shall my people build a house unto my name, that I may institute those ordinances which pertain to the dispensation of the fulness of times. For since my people have been sifted, I will try them again whether they will receive the truth, and pervert it not. And I will show unto my servant James all things pertaining to this house and the priesthood of those who shall minister therein. And I will give unto him the preparation for an holy endowment therein, that he may instruct my people in the principles of the mysteries of my kingdom, as they are severally able to learn.

7. And if my people will build a house unto me according to my commandments, and will not be slothful therein, but will make speed to build, then will I endow them, even so many as are faithful and obey me and hearken to my words and to the words of my servants whom I have appointed to be their leaders. But to the disobedient and rebellious will I not give power, and if they receive the word, it shall be dead unto them, and they shall not have power nor understand it. And I will separate between the righteous and the wicked, and between the obedient and the rebellious.

8. And I will try my people with a great trial. And because they have been tried in chastisement, I will now even try them in faith and in obedience to my law. And if they will diligently serve me, and give heed unto all my words, that I have spoken and shall speak unto them by the mouth of my servant James, behold, in the house which they shall build unto me, will I reveal unto them things which have been kept in the secrets of heaven from before the world was, things without which the kingdom of God cannot hold dominion, nor men be redeemed from deceit and violence; and these things are exceeding precious and to be obtained by obedience and patience and devotion to truth.

9. Therefore, whosoever will not abide the preparation faithfully, shall not be blessed, neither shall ye teach him the mysteries of the kingdom, nor will I give him power; but of all you teach the mysteries, shall you take a great covenant. And he that abideth not in his covenant, shall receive of the wrath of God according to the measure of his covenant and the evil he doeth therein; yea, verily, out of his own mouth shall he be judged, and as he hath spoken, so shall it be done unto him.

10. Therefore, let all my saints set their hands diligently to build a house unto my name, that I may come and dwell therein, and that I may restore unto them that which they have lost, and may give unto them those things which I gave unto my church in former days, and may reveal unto them things which have never been revealed among men.

11. And if my people will cease all their contentions, and their backbitings and jealousies, and will present themselves holy before me, then will I appoint unto them, in the days of their poverty, a place for their baptisms for their dead, which pertains unto my house. But in their controversies and contentions I will not bless them, nor bestow upon them mine authority in the most holy things, because they do not understand my law, nor do they know for whom they shall baptize; and while they contend one with another, they will not receive my word, nor receive wisdom from me; they call evil good, and good evil, and they are not wise. Therefore is the blessing withheld till they humble themselves, and hearken to the voice of truth, which my servant James, who is faithful, speaketh unto them.

MG: what were the fruits of this revelation? Do the Strangites practice ordinances for the dead in their temples today? Do they do endowments? Do they have a system by which they keep records of the work done for the dead which can become part of the eternal book of life? If so, are they done with claimed priesthood authority? Do the Strangites wear the holy temple garment?

I will wait to hear the answers from one who I'm sure is more familiar with the fruits of the Strangite movement than I am. I do find it interesting as a sidenote that the witnesses to the Vorhee plates never make the claim to have had an angel of god appear to them and witness to them that indeed the plates were "of god"...or maybe I missed reading that. They relied upon the singular testimonies of men.

So when you ask the question, "So -- was the Prophet, Seer, Revelator and Translator, President James J. Strang any more or less of a "trickster" than was Joe Smith?", I would say that the answer may be related to the fruits of each one of these organizations and/or prophets. If there is only one trickster, I would think that it would be the one who's works resulted in an organization in which the fruit either never fully developed or withered on the vine before maturing at all.

Regards,
MG
Post Reply