Origins of the Book of Mormon

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

This is exactly why I provided a link to the expositor and challenged whyme to copy and paste the hate filled sections.

I also doubt he has actually read it.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_Sethbag
_Emeritus
Posts: 6855
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:52 am

Post by _Sethbag »

I read the Expositor first (and only) edition available on Dale Broadhurst's site once and afterward I was like "hmm, that's it?"

I honestly thought going in that I would find some really wild, Satan-inspired call to tar and feather and murder the Prophet or something. I mean, it's built up so much as just an instrument of pure evil, after reading the real thing I was thinking hmm, ok, well William Law just really didn't buy into Joseph's justifications for polygamy and thought Joseph was guilty of sin and needed to repent. Not that he wanted Joseph's head on a pike or anything like that.
Mormonism ceased being a compelling topic for me when I finally came to terms with its transformation from a personality cult into a combination of a real estate company, a SuperPac, and Westboro Baptist Church. - Kishkumen
_Runtu
_Emeritus
Posts: 16721
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 5:06 am

Post by _Runtu »

Sethbag wrote:I read the Expositor first (and only) edition available on Dale Broadhurst's site once and afterward I was like "hmm, that's it?"

I honestly thought going in that I would find some really wild, Satan-inspired call to tar and feather and murder the Prophet or something. I mean, it's built up so much as just an instrument of pure evil, after reading the real thing I was thinking hmm, ok, well William Law just really didn't buy into Joseph's justifications for polygamy and thought Joseph was guilty of sin and needed to repent. Not that he wanted Joseph's head on a pike or anything like that.


Yeah, same reaction here. Thomas Sharp's paper was more the rabble-rousing, Mormon-hating rag, but William Law's little paper was almost pollyanna-ish in its innocent moralizing.
Runtu's Rincón

If you just talk, I find that your mouth comes out with stuff. -- Karl Pilkington
_Trevor
_Emeritus
Posts: 7213
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:28 pm

Post by _Trevor »

Runtu wrote:Yeah, same reaction here. Thomas Sharp's paper was more the rabble-rousing, Mormon-hating rag, but William Law's little paper was almost pollyanna-ish in its innocent moralizing.


Crimeny... If there weren't all of this folklore bashing William Law and accusing him of trying to kill Joseph Smith, which probably didn't happen, this guy might be considered a prophet of sorts. After all, Mormons are falling all over themselves to forget the very same things that Law complained about, if they even know about them in the first place. If it weren't for all of the implicit Joseph worshiping going on, you might think this was Law's church.
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”
Post Reply