Curse of Cain

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: Curse of Cain

Post by _The Nehor »

antishock8 wrote:Do we have an official proclamation by the First Presidency that states Mormon Doctrine and Doctrines of Salvation aren't doctrine?


No, but we also lack an official proclamation stating that the back of Lucky Charms boxes aren't doctrine.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_SatanWasSetUp
_Emeritus
Posts: 1183
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:40 pm

Re: Curse of Cain

Post by _SatanWasSetUp »

Well, I prayed about it and the little Lucky Charms leprachaun appeared before me and said "They're magically delicious." I suppose that means it really is doctrine.
"We of this Church do not rely on any man-made statement concerning the nature of Deity. Our knowledge comes directly from the personal experience of Joseph Smith." - Gordon B. Hinckley

"It's wrong to criticize leaders of the Mormon Church even if the criticism is true." - Dallin H. Oaks
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: Curse of Cain

Post by _The Nehor »

SatanWasSetUp wrote:Well, I prayed about it and the little Lucky Charms leprachaun appeared before me and said "They're magically delicious." I suppose that means it really is doctrine.


If you've had your revelation, make sure you follow through on it.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
Post Reply