TAK wrote:Frankly given your interactions and past behaviors of inserting yourself into other peoples affairs
Meaning that I treated a friend as a friend, as I would want to be treated, against a background of which I've been aware for at least ten years.
The horrific act of sharing a link to a public message board with an old friend continues to loom as one of the most horrible and amoral acts of the twenty-first century, the worst thing Mini-Scartch has ever seen on a message board, and etc.
And, from that single unspeakably appalling deed of treachery and unvarnished evil, a recurring pattern of unethical interference can justly be inferred on the principle that, if one Indian walks in a single-file line, that proves that all do.
TAK wrote:it would not surprise me if some conversation occurred – say at the FAIR Conf. where you conferred to young disciple - LOP some satisfaction in knowing who ol’ Scratch is ..
So you are serious.
I'm so sorry.
Well, it will suffice reasonable people out there -- don't laugh; I'm aware of several on this board -- to know that LOAP is not operating on my instructions. He is not carrying out my fiendish plans.
This board is a very weird place.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$