The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART TWO: Implementation

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_solomarineris
_Emeritus
Posts: 1207
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 1:51 am

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART TWO: Implementation

Post by _solomarineris »

harmony wrote:
solomarineris wrote:Well shades,
All i can say is; it didn't take long before you guys start to chop posts left and right.
Way to go. So much for my naïve optimism.


What do you mean by "chopped"?


Well,
Some of my posts never appeared. I didn't think I was offensive.
(I don't think I'm under LDS influence to halucinate).
_Yoda

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART TWO: Implementation

Post by _Yoda »

solo wrote:Well,
Some of my posts never appeared. I didn't think I was offensive.
(I don't think I'm under LDS influence to halucinate).


I'm not sure exactly what happened with what you are describing. Are you saying that you posted something and then it later disappeared, or that after you posted a comment, it never showed up as being posted?

I'm wondering if there is sometime of systems hiccup that need Keene's attention.

Would you mind including a link as an example so we can look into this?
_solomarineris
_Emeritus
Posts: 1207
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 1:51 am

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART TWO: Implementation

Post by _solomarineris »

liz3564 wrote:
solo wrote:Well,
Some of my posts never appeared. I didn't think I was offensive.
(I don't think I'm under LDS influence to halucinate).


I'm not sure exactly what happened with what you are describing. Are you saying that you posted something and then it later disappeared, or that after you posted a comment, it never showed up as being posted?

I'm wondering if there is sometime of systems hiccup that need Keene's attention.

Would you mind including a link as an example so we can look into this?


Liz,
Now that you are behaving & acting so sincere, I have no intention of dis-believing you guys intentionally
deleted anything I posted. I hope you are right.
I truly think this site has great promise to grow unless it succumbs to censorship.
Big Up
(copied shamelessly from Lamanite)
_Yoda

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART TWO: Implementation

Post by _Yoda »

solo wrote:Liz,
Now that you are behaving & acting so sincere, I have no intention of dis-believing you guys intentionally
deleted anything I posted. I hope you are right.
I truly think this site has great promise to grow unless it succumbs to censorship.
Big Up
(copied shamelessly from Lamanite)



Thanks, solo. :wink:

I am sincere about wanting to get to the bottom of this, though. If there really is some type of systems issue, it needs to be addressed.

Would you mind PM'ing me with exactly what you experienced when, and include a link from a thread that it happened with? Give me as much detail as you can.(i.e. any type of error messages that came up, etc.)

I can forward the information to Keene, and he can follow up. That way, we can see if it is a systems issue on your end or ours.
_Scottie
_Emeritus
Posts: 4166
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:54 pm

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART TWO: Implementation

Post by _Scottie »

Solo, we don't delete posts without affixing a red mod note explaining why.

You should never see your post outright deleted.
If there's one thing I've learned from this board, it's that consensual sex with multiple partners is okay unless God commands it. - Abman

I find this place to be hostile toward all brands of stupidity. That's why I like it. - Some Schmo
_Yoda

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART TWO: Implementation

Post by _Yoda »

Scottie wrote:Solo, we don't delete posts without affixing a red mod note explaining why.

You should never see your post outright deleted.


Exactly. You would either be "touched by Liz," "stamped by Scottie," etc. :wink:
Post Reply