Psychological Analysis of Kevin Graham's Posts

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Kevin Graham
_Emeritus
Posts: 13037
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm

Re: Psychological Analysis of Kevin Graham's Posts

Post by _Kevin Graham »

dayum... talk about your backfires...
_MCB
_Emeritus
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 3:14 pm

Re: Psychological Analysis of Kevin Graham's Posts

Post by _MCB »

Molok wrote:Sorry Droopy, but Kevin isn't LDS, so no one here is going to make too big of a stink about anything he says.

I've seen some stinky allusions to my cultural heritage on some threads on which I don't participate. However, since they are indirect, I just ignore them. No big stink. Worth ignoring.
Huckelberry said:
I see the order and harmony to be the very image of God which smiles upon us each morning as we awake.

http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/a ... cc_toc.htm
_schreech
_Emeritus
Posts: 2470
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 3:49 pm

Re: Psychological Analysis of Kevin Graham's Posts

Post by _schreech »

Droopy wrote:...snip...


Image
"your reasoning that children should be experimented upon to justify a political agenda..is tantamount to the Nazi justification for experimenting on human beings."-SUBgenius on gay parents
"I've stated over and over again on this forum and fully accept that I'm a bigot..." - ldsfaqs
_Droopy
_Emeritus
Posts: 9826
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:06 pm

Re: Psychological Analysis of Kevin Graham's Posts

Post by _Droopy »

Droopy getting indignant about it seems hypocritical though, as he can be just as insulting even more often than Kevin.


E is either utterly delusional, or lying in a rather bald faced manner to score polemical points. I have, do, and will again fire back at some people here, on occasion, in a harsh or assertive manner. I would place such an approach as a very small fraction of my total posting history. That's the difference. For Kevin, such discourse forms his primary mode of argument and discussion.

There's also a subtext here that this is the same as what Schryver was doing, and it really isn't.


There's no such subtext at all, at least meant. Kevin is clearly a deeply angry, bitter, conflicted, and disturbed neurotic, flailing and raging against mythical enemies (the Church, its leaders, and its defenders) of his own creation. Neither they nor I bear any responsibility for his present obnoxious and unlikeable condition.
Nothing is going to startle us more when we pass through the veil to the other side than to realize how well we know our Father [in Heaven] and how familiar his face is to us

- President Ezra Taft Benson


I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.

- Thomas Sowell
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: Psychological Analysis of Kevin Graham's Posts

Post by _Chap »

Droopy wrote: I have, do, and will again fire back at some people here, on occasion, in a harsh or assertive manner.


Alarm! Alarm!

Reality perception monitor shows indications in red zone!

Alarm! Alarm!


Droopy wrote: I would place such an approach as a very small fraction of my total posting history.


Alarm cancel.

Damage control fully operational. Emergency over.

Alarm cancel.
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_Kevin Graham
_Emeritus
Posts: 13037
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm

Re: Psychological Analysis of Kevin Graham's Posts

Post by _Kevin Graham »

LOL!

Droopy's propensity for projection is something he's unable to come to grips with. The opposite is so often true, and no amount of evidence will phase him.

Of course if the only posts of mine which droopy reads are those in response to his, then I could see how he'd think my "approach" is mostly aggressive. But he willfully ignores the fact that no one on this forum agrees with his analysis, and the fact that I have numerous debates with a wide variety of people, and none of us seem to be at each other's throats.

So this proves that the factor that drives my "approach" with droopy, isn't me, but rather droopy.

As far as being eternally bitter, hateful, angry, etc., most folks here who are also on my Facebook friend's list would probably disagree. They see frequent images of me smiling and having a blast, whether by myself or with my family. Loran on the other hand... well, I think there are three known images of him on the web, and in each photo he looks like he is on the verge of slitting someone's throat, even while having lunch among "friends" at an apologetic conference.

Droopy needs to get laid in the worst way.
Post Reply