Joseph Smith vs Harvey Milk

[_Hoops]

We don't need yahoos and morgbots like him around here.

You forgot to add that we need yahoos like ME around here.

[_Jason Bourne]

Yes, and I am sure he will come back all dejected saying that I was merely picking on him because he was a TBM, and ignoring the fact that he blatantly broke the rules of the board twice after being asked to refrain from it.

Frankly, I'm looking forward to a peaceful week.

Oh...ETA...we had to add that rule into the Board Rules due to his foolishness to begin with...so this is hardly the first time he has been warned about this.

Bot loves to play the "poor, poor, pitiful me" game here. He acts like he is so picked on and loves to embellish it. His comment that I my calling him out on tossing the gay accusation in his recent posting was like Eric calling him a child molester is a fine example. Yet he calls many here degenerate apostates and vile hypocrites.

Either he is just playing games or he is really thinned skin.

[_ludwigm]

We don't need yahoos and morgbots like him around here.

You forgot to add that we need yahoos like ME around here.

Did You read Gulliver's Travels? Is this the word used in it?
(This is the book I have read first time this word in. I may have been 12 then.)

A Yahoo is a legendary being in the novel Gulliver's Travels (1726) by Jonathan Swift.
Swift describes the Yahoos as vile and savage creatures, filthy and with unpleasant habits, resembling human beings far too closely for the liking of protagonist Lemuel Gulliver, who finds the calm and rational society of intelligent horses, the Houyhnhnms, far preferable. The Yahoos are primitive creatures obsessed with "pretty stones" they find by digging in mud, thus representing the distasteful materialism and ignorant elitism Swift encountered in Britain. Hence the term "yahoo" has come to mean "a crude, brutish or obscenely coarse person".

I hoop that You are not that type being...

[_Hoops]

I hoop that You are not that type being...

I was teasing. I hope I am not yahoo-ish too often, though I won't claim I NEVER am.

[_stemelbow]

Except it is not morally repugnant for the LDS Church to reflect plural marriage in their temple sealing polices at least for men who are divorced or were sealed to a now deceased woman.

Except what does that have to do with this?

[_Eric]

ETA: Posted as soon as I saw his post; didn't realize it was already done. liz, you rule. We don't need yahoos and morgbots like him around here.

+1

Thanks Liz. I was wondering how long we were going to have to tolerate Creepy Crockett's trolling again.

[_Yoda]

ETA: Posted as soon as I saw his post; didn't realize it was already done. liz, you rule. We don't need yahoos and morgbots like him around here.

+1

Thanks Liz. I was wondering how long we were going to have to tolerate Creepy Crockett's trolling again.

Well, I'm sure his week off the board will fly by for us! LOL

[_Willy Law]

+1

Thanks Liz. I was wondering how long we were going to have to tolerate Creepy Crockett's trolling again.

Well, I'm sure his week off the board will fly by for us! LOL

To me the presence of the apologists is what makes this board so interesting. Without Bot, Dr. Peterson and the rest, this board would pretty much just be PostMo or NOM. I hope they all stick around.
Then again I guess Eric has a little more personal experience with them than I do.

[_Yoda]

I would be fine with Bob if he would knock off the "poor me, I'm persecuted" act every time he gets painted into a corner he can't get out of.

He is quite knowledgable about Church history, and I would actually enjoy his opinion if he could give it minus the snark.

[_hatersinmyward]

joseph would beat milk's ass.

according to folklore the prophet joseph never lost a stick pull. he won everytime ;)