With Edmunds-Tucker act repealed

[_Joseph]

Why is Plural marriage still illegal? Or is it?

The Edmunds-Tucker act was repealed in 1978 and the blacks were given the priesthood that same year (June 9, 1978). Was the act repealed before the 'revelation', or after? Was there a quiet agreement on this to placate the government and pave the way for the return of plural marriage?

Why has l-dsinc not reintroduced plural marriage since the main act against it was repealed? Or, are the top dogs once again secretly practicing spiritual wifery without the knowledge of the masses they rule as joeyboy & Co did before? That would explain tubbietommy's many 'widow ladies' always baking him cookies and his constantly visiting them.

[_jon]

Perhaps if you apologised to the board and committed to not being a malicious vigilante against this environment your threads might gain more posts.

Just a thought

[_Joseph]

No one needs to apologize to criminals, thieves or anyone who supports them. Stealing is a way of life for too many and if you support those who steal you are one of them.

I did not shut this board down. A l-dsinc member did it.

If you can't get past that and see reality you are a fool.

Too many here bury their heads in the sand just as they did when they were members of the cult.

[_3sheets2thewind]

No one needs to apologize to criminals, thieves or anyone who supports them. Stealing is a way of life for too many and if you support those who steal you are one of them.

I did not shut this board down. A l-dsinc member did it.

If you can't get past that and see reality you are a fool.

Too many here bury their heads in the sand just as they did when they were members of the cult.

hey twat, you do realize that anything original is the ownership of the person who created it, so you better delete the quote of others you are using in your signature line, unless they have granted you permission to use their original copyright work.

[_Joseph]

The short quote from the whole easily falls in the 'fair use' exceptions.

Do some reading and maybe you will actually learn something. Or you could ask tubbietommy about it, maybe pray to the spook who reveals the truth of all things?

Guess you know nothing of the posted topic so you are choosing to be a whining, hand wringing old woman, right?

[_3sheets2thewind]

The short quote from the whole easily falls in the 'fair use' exceptions.

Just so we are clear, when you - Joseph - infringe a copyright work, it is fair use, but when any one else does call the FBI. Thanks for clearing that up. You, Joseph, do not have to honor copyrights but everyone else does.

[_Joseph]

sorry boy, but all others on here with short quotes and excerpts fall under 'fair use' in copyright law as well.

If you are going to whine, at least be accurate. Don't act like a typical l-dsinc idiot.

[_3sheets2thewind]

joseph its ok to be a hypocrite. you don't care about copyright or fairuse, until it is you who is violating a copyright.

--------------

as to your OP, speaking of idiotic. how many posters here have indicated they are one the 12 apostles, or in the 1st Presidency of the LDS Church?

Second how many posters here claim to be mind readers?

So how on God's green earth is a some lowly average member of the Church suppose to know the inner thoughts, actions, etc. of the Prophet....

thank you once again for a moronic post.

[_Simon Belmont]

No one needs to apologize to criminals, thieves or anyone who supports them. Stealing is a way of life for too many and if you support those who steal you are one of them.

There has been no criminal activity on this board, ever.

Dumbass.