Are there limits to marital intimacy in Mormonism?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.

Are there limits to marital intimacy in Mormonism?

 
Total votes: 0

_Hades
_Emeritus
Posts: 859
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 5:27 am

Re: Are there limits to marital intimacy in Mormonism?

Post by _Hades »

Correct Mormon sex is missionary position only. Pull down the garments just enough to get 'er done. What ever you do don't enjoy it. Only have sexual relations when trying to get pregnant. Remember it is our duty as Mormons to multiply and replenish the Earth. You really can't have too many kids.
I'm the apostate your bishop warned you about.
_just me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9070
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:46 pm

Re: Are there limits to marital intimacy in Mormonism?

Post by _just me »

Hades wrote:Correct Mormon sex is missionary position only. Pull down the garments just enough to get 'er done. What ever you do don't enjoy it. Only have sexual relations when trying to get pregnant. Remember it is our duty as Mormons to multiply and replenish the Earth. You really can't have too many kids.


I totally forgot about the "sex with garments on" rule! OMG!
~Those who benefit from the status quo always attribute inequities to the choices of the underdog.~Ann Crittenden
~The Goddess is not separate from the world-She is the world and all things in it.~
_StrangeLand
_Emeritus
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:31 pm

Re: Are there limits to marital intimacy in Mormonism?

Post by _StrangeLand »

harmony wrote:
StrangeLand wrote: There is a general principle to avoid unnatural, impure or unholy practices, but that principle is wide open to interpretation.


No, it's not.

Good grief.


Please provide proof of a definitive interpretation.
_DarkHelmet
_Emeritus
Posts: 5422
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:38 pm

Re: Are there limits to marital intimacy in Mormonism?

Post by _DarkHelmet »

just me wrote:
Hades wrote:Correct Mormon sex is missionary position only. Pull down the garments just enough to get 'er done. What ever you do don't enjoy it. Only have sexual relations when trying to get pregnant. Remember it is our duty as Mormons to multiply and replenish the Earth. You really can't have too many kids.


I totally forgot about the "sex with garments on" rule! OMG!


I would double check with BC Space to see if that is doctrine.
"We have taken up arms in defense of our liberty, our property, our wives, and our children; we are determined to preserve them, or die."
- Captain Moroni - 'Address to the Inhabitants of Canada' 1775
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: Are there limits to marital intimacy in Mormonism?

Post by _Dr. Shades »

The Nehor wrote:If you need an itemized list of sex acts you can and can't do then you're doing sex wrong.

If you think that having sex is a pain in the ass, then you're doing it wrong.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_jon
_Emeritus
Posts: 1464
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:15 am

Re: Are there limits to marital intimacy in Mormonism?

Post by _jon »

Spencer W. Kimball (when Prophet) seems to think there are:
The union of the sexes, husband and wife (and only husband and wife), was for the principal purpose of bringing children into the world. Sexual experiences were never intended by the Lord to be a mere plaything or merely to satisfy passions and lusts. We know of no directive from the Lord that proper sexual experience between husbands and wives need be limited totally to the procreation of children, but we find much evidence from Adam until now that no provision was ever made by the Lord for indiscriminate sex.

Or does he:
President Kimball has observed: “The Bible celebrates sex and its proper use, presenting it as God-created, God-ordained, God-blessed. It makes plain that God himself implanted the physical magnetism between the sexes for two reasons: for the propagation of the human race, and for the expression of that kind of love between man and wife that makes for true oneness. His commandment to the first man and woman to be ‘one flesh’ was as important as his command to ‘be fruitful and multiply.’”
'Church pictures are not always accurate' (The Nehor May 4th 2011)

Morality is doing what is right, regardless of what you are told.
Religion is doing what you are told, regardless of what is right.
_DarkHelmet
_Emeritus
Posts: 5422
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:38 pm

Re: Are there limits to marital intimacy in Mormonism?

Post by _DarkHelmet »

jon wrote:Spencer W. Kimball (when Prophet) seems to think there are:
The union of the sexes, husband and wife (and only husband and wife), was for the principal purpose of bringing children into the world. Sexual experiences were never intended by the Lord to be a mere plaything or merely to satisfy passions and lusts. We know of no directive from the Lord that proper sexual experience between husbands and wives need be limited totally to the procreation of children, but we find much evidence from Adam until now that no provision was ever made by the Lord for indiscriminate sex.


He sounds like a lot of fun in bed. I imagine his wife got this same lecture when she tried to get frisky with him.
"We have taken up arms in defense of our liberty, our property, our wives, and our children; we are determined to preserve them, or die."
- Captain Moroni - 'Address to the Inhabitants of Canada' 1775
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Are there limits to marital intimacy in Mormonism?

Post by _Buffalo »

DarkHelmet wrote:
jon wrote:Spencer W. Kimball (when Prophet) seems to think there are:
The union of the sexes, husband and wife (and only husband and wife), was for the principal purpose of bringing children into the world. Sexual experiences were never intended by the Lord to be a mere plaything or merely to satisfy passions and lusts. We know of no directive from the Lord that proper sexual experience between husbands and wives need be limited totally to the procreation of children, but we find much evidence from Adam until now that no provision was ever made by the Lord for indiscriminate sex.


He sounds like a lot of fun in bed. I imagine his wife got this same lecture when she tried to get frisky with him.


I'm pretty sure Spencer W. was gay. He's the guy who thought that too much masturbation makes you gay. I can't imagine a straight man thinking that. Also, I've heard he had a reputation for being very affectionate with men.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
Post Reply