MMM site designated as historic landmark | Salt Lake Tribune

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_sunstoned
_Emeritus
Posts: 1670
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 6:12 am

Re: MMM site designated as historic landmark | Salt Lake Tribune

Post by _sunstoned »

I found this very interesting that Elder Jensen offered an apology. I would what GBH would think of this.

LDS Church historian and First Quorum of the Seventy member Marlin K. Jensen told the audience of about 200 that he was “grateful” for the designation and had great appreciation for the descendant groups and federal agencies that worked to achieve it.

“It’s a historic occasion,” he said, then apologized for the killings, saying the actions by the militia went against all Christian principles that guide the LDS Church and its members, who are saddened by the event.


(I added the bolding):
_Corpsegrinder
_Emeritus
Posts: 615
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 11:33 pm

Re: MMM site designated as historic landmark | Salt Lake Tribune

Post by _Corpsegrinder »

Yes, extremely interesting. I read that GBH had actually wanted to apologize but the Church’s attorneys forced him to expunge the word “apology” from his talk during the dedication of the monument back in the 90’s…I wonder why.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: MMM site designated as historic landmark | Salt Lake Tribune

Post by _harmony »

Corpsegrinder wrote:Yes, extremely interesting. I read that GBH had actually wanted to apologize but the Church’s attorneys forced him to expunge the word “apology” from his talk during the dedication of the monument back in the 90’s…I wonder why.


Attorneys who give bad advice... who would ever have thought it?
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: MMM site designated as historic landmark | Salt Lake Tribune

Post by _Buffalo »

Corpsegrinder wrote:Yes, extremely interesting. I read that GBH had actually wanted to apologize but the Church’s attorneys forced him to expunge the word “apology” from his talk during the dedication of the monument back in the 90’s…I wonder why.


Obviously to protect the church from litigation.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
Post Reply