Major scientific bulls-eye for Star Wars apologists.

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_DarkHelmet
_Emeritus
Posts: 5422
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:38 pm

Major scientific bulls-eye for Star Wars apologists.

Post by _DarkHelmet »

Those who think Star Wars is true (with every fiber of their being) are rejoicing at the latest scientific evidence supporting their claims.

http://news.yahoo.com/planet-star-wars- ... 04397.html

It's a real-life Tatooine. A spectacle made popular by the "Star Wars" saga — a planet with two suns — has now been confirmed in space for the first time, astronomers revealed.

Scientists using NASA's Kepler space telescope captured details of a giant planet in orbit around the pair of binary stars that make up the Kepler-16 system, which is about 200 light-years away.

"This discovery is stunning," said study co-author Alan Boss at the Carnegie Institute in Washington. "Once again, what used to be science fiction has turned into reality." [See an image and video of Tatooine planet Kepler 16b]

When Tatooine was depicted on film, many scientists doubted that such planets could really exist. Now there's proof.

"It's possible that there's a real Tatooine out there," said John Knoll, visual effects supervisor at the special-effects firm Industrial Light and Magic, which was behind the "Star Wars" films. "Kepler 16b is unambiguous and dramatic proof that planets really do form around binaries."

The new discovery is expanding the bounds of what scientists, as well as filmakers, can conceive, he said.

"Again and again we see that the science is stranger and cooler than fiction," Knoll said during a NASA press conference today. "The very existence of these discoveries gives us cause to dream bigger, to question our assumptions."

The planet, dubbed Kepler-16(AB)-b, passes in front of both stars in view of the satellite, regularly dimming their light. Each star also eclipses its companion as they orbit each other. Altogether, these motions allow scientists to precisely calculate the masses, radii and trajectories of all three bodies.

The newfound planet keeps a distance from its stars nearly three-quarters that of the distance between the Earth and the sun. It is somewhat like Saturn in size, although nearly 50 percent denser, suggesting it is richer in heavy elements. [10 Real Alien Worlds That Could Be In 'Star Wars']

"Kepler-16(AB)-b is not habitable as we know it," said study lead author Laurance Doyle , an astrophysicist at the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) Institute in Mountain View, Calif.

This alien world travels on a nearly circular 229-day orbit around its two parent stars, Kepler-16A and Kepler-16B, which are about 69 and 20 percent as massive as the sun, respectively. The stars keep close to each other — only a fifth of the distance between Earth and the sun on average, which is closer than Mercury gets to the sun — completing an orbit around each other every 41 days, researchers added. [Infographic: New Planet is Like "Star Wars'" Tatooine]

Worlds that orbit around two stars, known as circumbinary planets, had been hinted at before. Stars in pairs both orbit around a point in space called barycenter, and researchers at times saw these orbits were slightly off, suggesting the presence of a planet tugging at both stars. However, Kepler-16(AB)-b is the first planet that scientists have detected directly passing in front of, or transiting, its stars, temporarily dimming their light.

Since the movements of this world and its two stars are all virtually confined to the same plane, the researchers suggest they all formed from the same disk of dust and gas. Planets that were captured from other star systems might be expected to orbit at a range of angles.

"Now that we know how to detect circumbinary planets, I think we are going to find a lot more rapidly," Doyle told SPACE.com.

The scientists detailed their findings in the Sept. 16 issue of the journal Science.
"We have taken up arms in defense of our liberty, our property, our wives, and our children; we are determined to preserve them, or die."
- Captain Moroni - 'Address to the Inhabitants of Canada' 1775
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Major scientific bulls-eye for Star Wars apologists.

Post by _Buffalo »

It's kind of sad that the Book of Mormon has never had a bullseye of comparable magnitude.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: Major scientific bulls-eye for Star Wars apologists.

Post by _Darth J »

How could a film school graduate from USC, with no training whatsoever in astronomy or astrophysics, have made such a prediction?
_MrStakhanovite
_Emeritus
Posts: 5269
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:32 am

Re: Major scientific bulls-eye for Star Wars apologists.

Post by _MrStakhanovite »

Darth J wrote:How could a film school graduate from USC, with no training whatsoever in astronomy or astrophysics, have made such a prediction?


lol
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Major scientific bulls-eye for Star Wars apologists.

Post by _Buffalo »

Darth J wrote:How could a film school graduate from USC, with no training whatsoever in astronomy or astrophysics, have made such a prediction?


Of course, the Lord isn't going to provide us with conclusive proof that Star Wars is real. He'll give us just enough to encourage our faith, but not so much as to impede our free will to attend the Star Wars section at next year's Comicon.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_Hasa Diga Eebowai
_Emeritus
Posts: 2390
Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 8:57 am

Re: Major scientific bulls-eye for Star Wars apologists.

Post by _Hasa Diga Eebowai »

-
Last edited by Guest on Sun Jul 13, 2014 7:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: Major scientific bulls-eye for Star Wars apologists.

Post by _Darth J »

From FARMS (Foundation for Astronomical Research and Mandalorian Studies):

"The importance of Star Wars lies not in its astronomical location, but in its ability to bring us to a knowledge of the Force."
_DrW
_Emeritus
Posts: 7222
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 2:57 am

Re: Major scientific bulls-eye for Star Wars apologists.

Post by _DrW »

Darth J wrote:From FARMS (Foundation for Astronomical Research and Mandalorian Studies):

"The importance of Star Wars lies not in its astronomical location, but in its ability to bring us to a knowledge of the Force."

Exactly!

It is gratifying to see that a critic is capable of really understanding these things.
David Hume: "---Mistakes in philosophy are merely ridiculous, those in religion are dangerous."

DrW: "Mistakes in science are learning opportunities and are eventually corrected."
Post Reply