Off topic from The Cultural Hall Run-Around

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_MsJack
_Emeritus
Posts: 4375
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 5:06 am

Re: Off topic from The Cultural Hall Run-Around

Post by _MsJack »

why me wrote:And of course, MsJack and her nitpicking of Mormonism but overlooking the problems of protestantism.

CFR. Name a single topic wherein I've been critical of Mormonism while overlooking or denying similar problems within Protestantism.

Because I think you're making stuff up. Seems there's a lot of that going around on these forums lately.

What you really dislike, why me, is when people are critical of Mormonism, period. Whether or not the criticism is true is irrelevant. And when it's a Protestant being critical of Mormonism, it really upsets you, because you just don't like Protestants.
"It seems to me that these women were the head (κεφάλαιον) of the church which was at Philippi." ~ John Chrysostom, Homilies on Philippians 13

My Blogs: Weighted Glory | Worlds Without End: A Mormon Studies Roundtable | Twitter
_hobo1512
_Emeritus
Posts: 888
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 5:27 pm

Re: Off topic from The Cultural Hall Run-Around

Post by _hobo1512 »

why me wrote:
liz3564 wrote:So Ms. Jack is the new focus of your attacks on the women of this board, Cam? Nice. Who will be next?

You and Schryver ought to go bowling.


I like to turn the tables on people of other faiths who are critical of Mormonism. Their own faith is far from perfect. Of course some may think that this is antiprotestant or anticatholic but far from it. People from other faiths need to focus on their own faith's history and beliefs before bashing Mormons and Mormonism.


Small difference here. Most, if not all other religions face up to their past (good or bad). Mo's however want to whitewash it, or turn it into something different, deny it, or rewrite their manuals to make it go away.

BIG, BIG DIFFERENCE.
_hobo1512
_Emeritus
Posts: 888
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 5:27 pm

Re: Off topic from The Cultural Hall Run-Around

Post by _hobo1512 »

why me wrote:
liz3564 wrote:So Ms. Jack is the new focus of your attacks on the women of this board, Cam? Nice. Who will be next?

You and Schryver ought to go bowling.


I like to turn the tables on people of other faiths who are critical of Mormonism. Their own faith is far from perfect. Of course some may think that this is antiprotestant or anticatholic but far from it. People from other faiths need to focus on their own faith's history and beliefs before bashing Mormons and Mormonism.


Big difference here. Most, if not all other religions face up to their past (good or bad). Mo's however want to whitewash it, or turn it into something different, deny it, or rewrite their manuals to make it go away.

BIG, BIG DIFFERENCE.
_Yoda

Re: Off topic from The Cultural Hall Run-Around

Post by _Yoda »

Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:
liz3564 wrote:So Ms. Jack is the new focus of your attacks on the women of this board, Cam? Nice. Who will be next?

You and Schryver ought to go bowling.


Just because a man takes issues with some women and their positions on various matters doesn't mean he hates all women. You're an egotist, and a bore.


If you argued positions, that would be fine. You are civil in arguing positions with other men on the board, like Jason. However, when you are addressing, myself, Blixa, Jersey Girl, and now, Ms. Jack, you go into a vicious, personal attack mode. Your mysoginistic attitude is getting old. It must be a leftover from when you were Mormon.
Post Reply