Lizard Jew wrote:i mean anyone can read ill intent into anything.
to do so without evidence seems like a causing a problem.
whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty among people?
Uh, the only person reading intent without evidence is you, unless you have evidence that God had a different standard for Joseph as opposed to the rest of the saints.
Quasimodo wrote:I think he must still be answering to Jeffs in prison, though.
I thought the state of Utah had control of the money?
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
Blixa wrote:Well, still. Cackling over others's misfortunes is crappy behavior no matter where, when or about whom. It really cuts the moral high ground out from under one pretty completely.
I'm not sure Lizard Jew was ever on the high ground.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
Buffalo wrote:D&C 132 was supposedly the original revelation God gave Joseph on polygamy. And Joseph violated it left and right.
it was the original for the church.
that's why it is in the DC.
that's why the first one isn't.
it wasn't for the rest.
Sec 132 IS the first one. There is no other one.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.