Steve Benson's thread on RfM

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Steve Benson's thread on RfM

Post by _Kishkumen »

DrW wrote:Wouldn't worry to much about the Democrats, BC. From what I can see, most are either on their way out or already gone.


Unless they are really conservative.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Steve Benson's thread on RfM

Post by _Kishkumen »

Bond James Bond wrote:
bcspace wrote:Excommunicating all the Democrats would make for some fun times.


When the Democrats are gone watching the remaining Republicans thin the herd of liberal and moderate Republicans would be even funnier. Is a 5% capital gains tax low enough or should it be 3%?


BC will say 0% is the right figure. He, like many conservatives, wants to revisit the premodern era.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Bond James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 2690
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:21 pm

Re: Steve Benson's thread on RfM

Post by _Bond James Bond »

Kishkumen wrote:
Bond James Bond wrote:When the Democrats are gone watching the remaining Republicans thin the herd of liberal and moderate Republicans would be even funnier. Is a 5% capital gains tax low enough or should it be 3%?


BC will say 0% is the right figure. He, like many conservatives, wants to revisit the premodern era.


BC might be a proponent of Mitt Romney's wet dream...a -15% capital gains tax; he needs to get back all those pesky taxes he paid over the years.
Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded.-charity 3/7/07

MASH quotes
I peeked in the back [of the Bible] Frank, the Devil did it.
I avoid church religiously.
This isn't one of my sermons, I expect you to listen.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Steve Benson's thread on RfM

Post by _Kishkumen »

Bond James Bond wrote:BC might be a proponent of Mitt Romney's wet dream...a -15% capital gains tax; he needs to get back all those pesky taxes he paid over the years.


BC is not a bad guy, he just acts like one on this board most of the time.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Lucretia MacEvil
_Emeritus
Posts: 1558
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 7:01 am

Re: Steve Benson's thread on RfM

Post by _Lucretia MacEvil »

DrW wrote:Wouldn't worry to much about the Democrats, BC. From what I can see, most are either on their way out or already gone.


Maybe it will come to a showdown when the Democrat kids say to the frail kids, "get on the cart, we'll carry you, and you will contribute in other ways." The Republican kids will say, "hell, no, leave their lazy asses behind. We only look out for #1." Democrat kids say, "it can only work if we all work together." Republican kids say: "We will fight you every inch of the way on this one." Democrat kids decide to go occupy some other organization.
The person who is certain and who claims divine warrant for his certainty belongs now to the infancy of our species. Christopher Hitchens

Faith does not give you the answers, it just stops you asking the questions. Frater
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: Steve Benson's thread on RfM

Post by _Chap »

bcspace wrote:
Chap wrote:There is obviously an outflow.


Yes. There always has been. Just not near the extent you guys are claiming.


Here we go again.

It is not disputed (is it?) that the Pew survey was a reliable indication that the percentage of the population self-identifying as LDS/Mormon has remained fixed for a decade.

Nor it is not disputed that Mormons have larger families than average, and that they try hard to convert people.

It therefore follows that there is an outflow sufficient to balance the joint effects of large family size and conversion that would otherwise increase the proportion of self-identifying LDS/Mormons in the US population.

That is the extent of outflow that this guy is claiming. No more, but certainly no less, since less would be a mathematical impossibility.

(It also follows that if Mormons ceased to have larger families than average, and also ceased to convert a significant number of people and retain them as members, while maintaining the same outflow rate, they would steadily become a smaller and smaller proportion of the US population.)
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_Eyepatch
_Emeritus
Posts: 62
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 6:54 pm

REFORM!!

Post by _Eyepatch »

I love these type of threads because, in my humble opinion, the church is in DESPERATE NEED OF REFORM. Here is where I would start:

1. All missions become SERVICE-ONLY missions. I predict that convert baptisms would skyrocket.
2. End the failed "home teaching" program. replace it with "as need arises" e-mail contact buddy.
3. End the god-damned block!! 1.5 hours at most.
4. End the shake-down known as "tithing settlement." Simply send each giver a paper statement/receipt through the mail.
5. Preach from the pulpit that ALL DRESS is OK...please end the cultural preference for IBM-business attire.

There are at LEAST 10 more...but this would be a good start.
"Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest." - Denis Diderot
_Yoda

Re: REFORM!!

Post by _Yoda »

Eyepatch wrote:I love these type of threads because, in my humble opinion, the church is in DESPERATE NEED OF REFORM. Here is where I would start:

1. All missions become SERVICE-ONLY missions. I predict that convert baptisms would skyrocket.
2. End the failed "home teaching" program. replace it with "as need arises" e-mail contact buddy.
3. End the god-damned block!! 1.5 hours at most.
4. End the shake-down known as "tithing settlement." Simply send each giver a paper statement/receipt through the mail.
5. Preach from the pulpit that ALL DRESS is OK...please end the cultural preference for IBM-business attire.

There are at LEAST 10 more...but this would be a good start.


I LOVE all of these ideas!!!

Eyepatch for prophet!!!

:-)

I especially love the idea about dress.

I have Lupus and Fibromyalgia. I have a terrible time with nylons and heels. I have some beautiful pant suits that I wear to work all the time since we require business dress. Any of these outfits, I feel, would be very appropriate for Church, but they still require dresses be worn in the chapel on Sundays.

I have been tempted to go to my bishop about this, because there are several of us who have Fibromyalgia in our Ward.
_DarkHelmet
_Emeritus
Posts: 5422
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:38 pm

Re: REFORM!!

Post by _DarkHelmet »

Eyepatch wrote:4. End the shake-down known as "tithing settlement." Simply send each giver a paper statement/receipt through the mail.

Most charities just give me a receipt that I can use to figure out taxes. I am not required to meet with them at the end of the year. I chuckle when I see TBMs actually signing up for tithing settlement. Do they not realize that they can claim their tithing contributions on their taxes without attending tithing settlement, and that the Lord knows how much they gave? The tithing still counts.

5. Preach from the pulpit that ALL DRESS is OK...please end the cultural preference for IBM-business attire.


When I was in the YM presidency we had a couple semi-active kids that we would talk about during our presidency meetings. One of the kids would come to church in colored shirts, no tie, whatever he felt like wearing. We were concerned and wanted to help him. So it was suggested that we buy him a white shirt and tie to wear to church. We meant well, but thinking back on it we not only made that kid feel unwelcomed unless he conformed to the white shirt and tie standard, we further insulted him and his parents by offering to buy him a shirt, as if he couldn't afford it.
"We have taken up arms in defense of our liberty, our property, our wives, and our children; we are determined to preserve them, or die."
- Captain Moroni - 'Address to the Inhabitants of Canada' 1775
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: REFORM!!

Post by _harmony »

DarkHelmet wrote:
Eyepatch wrote:4. End the shake-down known as "tithing settlement." Simply send each giver a paper statement/receipt through the mail.

Most charities just give me a receipt that I can use to figure out taxes. I am not required to meet with them at the end of the year. I chuckle when I see TBMs actually signing up for tithing settlement. Do they not realize that they can claim their tithing contributions on their taxes without attending tithing settlement, and that the Lord knows how much they gave? The tithing still counts.


The Lord knows, but the church wants the members to remember who's in charge: the church, not God. So requiring tithing settlement is just one more of a long line of power plays to keep the members under the bishop's... and by extrapolation, the church's... thumb.

The best thing about tithing settlement is that whatever you say is what there is.

5. Preach from the pulpit that ALL DRESS is OK...please end the cultural preference for IBM-business attire.


When I was in the YM presidency we had a couple semi-active kids that we would talk about during our presidency meetings. One of the kids would come to church in colored shirts, no tie, whatever he felt like wearing. We were concerned and wanted to help him. So it was suggested that we buy him a white shirt and tie to wear to church. We meant well, but thinking back on it we not only made that kid feel unwelcomed unless he conformed to the white shirt and tie standard, we further insulted him and his parents by offering to buy him a shirt, as if he couldn't afford it.


Several years ago, we attended a sacrament meeting in Seattle. Back then, all the youth in the stake were put together into that ward. One of the youth who passed the sacrament had hair down to his waist. No one said a word to him. They were just glad he came. What a refreshing idea! (no doubt his bishop was released and reprimanded... )
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
Post Reply