Mitt's our Boy for President (link)

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Daniel2
_Emeritus
Posts: 356
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:57 pm

Re: Mitt's our Boy for President (link)

Post by _Daniel2 »

jskains wrote:It is so sad when people relish in bashing on people. SO much energy in demonizing a group of people.

I thought we as a society progressed beyond hatemongering???

Guess not.

JMS

You must've slept through the LDS church's support of Prop 8.

Daniel2
Last edited by Guest on Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Have compassion for everyone you meet even if they don't want it. What seems conceit, bad manners, or cynicism is always a sign of things no ears have heard, no eyes have seen. You do not know what wars are going on down there where the spirit meets the bone."--Miller Williams
_Daniel2
_Emeritus
Posts: 356
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:57 pm

Re: Mitt's our Boy for President (link)

Post by _Daniel2 »

DarkHelmet wrote:
Buffalo wrote:I wonder how seriously any Mormon takes a disgruntled ex-Catholic or ex-Protestant who bears their testimony at church after being recently baptized a Mormon. Surely anything that person says about their former religion cannot be trusted.

Oddly enough, many Mormons also quite like what "ex-gays" have to say and put a lot of stock in it. ;)

Daniel2
"Have compassion for everyone you meet even if they don't want it. What seems conceit, bad manners, or cynicism is always a sign of things no ears have heard, no eyes have seen. You do not know what wars are going on down there where the spirit meets the bone."--Miller Williams
_ldsfaqs
_Emeritus
Posts: 7953
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2011 11:41 pm

Re: Mitt's our Boy for President (link)

Post by _ldsfaqs »

There is a big difference between ex-other religions, gays, etc., and those that join the Church.

People that join the Church almost never have a hatred and bigotry toward their former faith, nor do they bear false witness of their former faith.

However, ex-mormons who are now anti-mormons DO do these things.
It's the BIGOTRY that invalidates the anti-mormon arguments, not that being "ex" something isn't sometimes useful to compare.

No Christian would take seriously the claims of Atheists or Islam against the Christian Faith.
So, to Mormons, it fascinates us that they take the claims of our enemy's so seriously. It's a double standard and hypocritical.
"Socialism is Rape and Capitalism is consensual sex" - Ben Shapiro
_Drifting
_Emeritus
Posts: 7306
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:52 am

Re: Mitt's our Boy for President (link)

Post by _Drifting »

ldsfaqs wrote:There is a big difference between ex-other religions, gays, etc., and those that join the Church.

People that join the Church almost never have a hatred and bigotry toward their former faith, nor do they bear false witness of their former faith.

However, ex-mormons who are now anti-mormons DO do these things.
It's the BIGOTRY that invalidates the anti-mormon arguments, not that being "ex" something isn't sometimes useful to compare.

No Christian would take seriously the claims of Atheists or Islam against the Christian Faith.
So, to Mormons, it fascinates us that they take the claims of our enemy's so seriously. It's a double standard and hypocritical.


This tells far more about Mormonism than I think you intended...
“We look to not only the spiritual but also the temporal, and we believe that a person who is impoverished temporally cannot blossom spiritually.”
Keith McMullin - Counsellor in Presiding Bishopric

"One, two, three...let's go shopping!"
Thomas S Monson - Prophet, Seer, Revelator
_Infymus
_Emeritus
Posts: 1584
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:10 pm

Re: Mitt's our Boy for President (link)

Post by _Infymus »

ldsfaqs wrote:People that join the Church almost never have a hatred and bigotry toward their former faith, nor do they bear false witness of their former faith.


I didn't, but after being Mormon, I learned to. I was taught my prior church was a wrong, didn't have the authority, nor the priesthood and wasn't lead by a Prophet. I was taught all churches were evil, wrong. I began to have hatred and bigotry towards my prior faith. Mormonism taught me these things. What was the first lesson? Joseph Smith told not to join any other churches. When I started reading McConkie, Kimball, it grew even more. When I first read the Book of Mormon and saw that the Catholic church was called a "whore", it grew. When i read McConkie and saw the hateful, bigoted teachings, it grew.

No Christian would take seriously the claims of Atheists or Islam against the Christian Faith. So, to Mormons, it fascinates us that they take the claims of our enemy's so seriously. It's a double standard and hypocritical.


Enemies? Faqs, you forget your Cult doctrine so conveniently. Do I have to dump out all the bigoted material your Cult has spouted about non-Mormon churches, including Islam?

You're such a Mormon snob.
_sock puppet
_Emeritus
Posts: 17063
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: Mitt's our Boy for President (link)

Post by _sock puppet »

jskains wrote:It is so sad when people relish in bashing on people. SO much energy in demonizing a group of people.

Interesting. It is the dynamics of the grouping of them that is demonized, and those that use it as a tool against others in the grouping. The members are victims of their Mormon leaders.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Mitt's our Boy for President (link)

Post by _Buffalo »

We've got several ex-Catholics who regularly stand up in class and mock the Catholic church. No one ever objects.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_Infymus
_Emeritus
Posts: 1584
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:10 pm

Re: Mitt's our Boy for President (link)

Post by _Infymus »

Drifting wrote:
jskains wrote:
That's exactly how I see your website. A childish temper tantrum.

JMS


What is on Mormon Curtain that is factually incorrect?


He won't and he can't. Because when you get right down to it, most of the material on the MC is personal contributed stories of the lives of those who were Mormon. Most of the other material is 100% quoted church material written by past and present leaders of the Cult. Stuff Stains doesn't want anyone to see. And like most apologists, Stains just wants Ex-Mormons to go away and shut up - he wants to invalidate their pain.

The MC is carefully constructed, well presented, categorized, easy to read and easy to navigate. It presents information in a way that the reader can find the information that Mormons like Faqs and Stains doesn't want people to see. It isn't fancy by any means and it isn't meant to be. Attack the HTML? Really?

Stains is the one throwing the temper tantrum. And I'll reaffirm my challenge to him or anyone else. Come up with a website as large as the MC - with as much information as I have about the Cult. Spend the dedicated time - the YEARS - working on it. Provide a community to support the website and help those in need.

Stains and those like him won't because a pro-LDS site would be just as damaging to the faith of Mormons as the MC is - unless you act just like MAD and censor everything. Doctrines of Mormonism have to be whitewashed, hidden, omitted, retracted, speaking as a man, don't know we teach that, sanitized. Best thing to do is go make a website were people flash their college degrees and parrot "I know the Church is true".

Stains, qwitcherbitchen and actually do something more than whinge.
Post Reply