Retroactive Banning for Legal Threats: Case One, Bot

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: Retroactive Banning for Legal Threats: Case One, Bot

Post by _Dr. Shades »

I can't respond to this thread without violating Universal Rule #3, so if anyone wants my response, I'm in the chat room.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
Top
_MrStakhanovite
_Emeritus
Posts: 5269
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:32 am

Re: Retroactive Banning for Legal Threats: Case One, Bot

Post by _MrStakhanovite »

Dr. Shades wrote:I can't respond to this thread without violating Universal Rule #3, so if anyone wants my response, I'm in the chat room.



I rest my case.
Top
_sock puppet
_Emeritus
Posts: 17063
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: Retroactive Banning for Legal Threats: Case One, Bot

Post by _sock puppet »

MrStakhanovite wrote:
Dr. Shades wrote:I can't respond to this thread without violating Universal Rule #3, so if anyone wants my response, I'm in the chat room.



I rest my case.

Please don't. I have quite enjoyed hearing you present your case, ever since 4/19/2010.
Top
_Shulem
_Emeritus
Posts: 12072
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:48 am

Re: Retroactive Banning for Legal Threats: Case One, Bot

Post by _Shulem »

Dr. Shades wrote:I can't respond to this thread without violating Universal Rule #3, so if anyone wants my response, I'm in the chat room.


Yes, you can respond in this thread if you want. Then just suspend yourself for a few days as a punishment for breaking the rules.

Paul O
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Terrestrial Forum”