Seth Payne on the Latest Board War

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Seth Payne on the Latest Board War

Post by _Kishkumen »

Drifting wrote:
bcspace wrote:Good standing with the Church is not an indication of standing with God...


Really?


bcspace inadvertently brings up a good point. I purposely say "members in good standing" as opposed to "faithful members" because the latter is a very subjective standard. Certain LDS apologists will use that subjectivity as wiggle room to attack their ideological enemies. It does not matter to Ralph "The Weenie" Hancock that Joanna Brooks is an active member with her testimony on MST. He has decided that he is the arbiter of what constitues valid belief in Mormonism, so he, motivated by his voracious ego and misogyny, will attack Sister Brooks relentlessly.

If he does this through some foundation of tinfoil-hat-wearing konservative kooks, that is his right. What I would take exception to is that his attacks derive support, whether indirectly or directly, from the LDS Church, say, by publication in a journal housed on BYU campus, etc.
Last edited by Guest on Tue May 22, 2012 1:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Seth Payne on the Latest Board War

Post by _Buffalo »

bcspace wrote:
Good standing with the Church is not an indication of standing with God or a sign of belief. The requirements for that are too broad.


If people's bishops can't judge who is in good standing with God, what makes you think you can?
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: Seth Payne on the Latest Board War

Post by _moksha »

Buffalo wrote:
bcspace wrote:
Good standing with the Church is not an indication of standing with God or a sign of belief. The requirements for that are too broad.


If people's bishops can't judge who is in good standing with God, what makes you think you can?


I believe Bcspace was referring to items not only like membership in the Church, but also the National Rifle Association, a Barry Goldwater campaign button, lawn signs for Proposition 8, brochures outlining how water fluoridation results in global communism, etc....

by the way, I like Bcspace.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_lulu
_Emeritus
Posts: 2310
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:08 am

Re: Seth Payne on the Latest Board War

Post by _lulu »

Buffalo wrote:
bcspace wrote:Good standing with the Church is not an indication of standing with God or a sign of belief. The requirements for that are too broad.

If people's bishops can't judge who is in good standing with God, what makes you think you can?
Don't distract bcspace right now. He's busy steadying the ark.
"And the human knew the source of life, the woman of him, and she conceived and bore Cain, and said, 'I have procreated a man with Yahweh.'" Gen. 4:1, interior quote translated by D. Bokovoy.
Post Reply