The Return of Moroni? or, RLDS Conference 1895

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: The Return of Moroni? or, RLDS Conference 1895

Post by _Kishkumen »

Another interesting tidbit to consider is the fact that Joseph and Emma's firstborn child, ALVIN, was born June, 15, 1828--nine months after Joseph and Emma went to the hill to retrieve the plates.

Things that make you go hmmm....
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: The Return of Moroni? or, RLDS Conference 1895

Post by _Kishkumen »

This baby Alvin, according to Joshua McKune, was supposed to translate the Record:

Wesley P. Walters wrote:Joseph had told his neighbor, Joshua McKune, that "his (Smith's) first born child was to translate the characters and hieroglyphics upon the plates, into our language, at the age of three years." (The Susquehanna Register, May 1, 1834, p.1)
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_palerobber
_Emeritus
Posts: 2026
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:48 pm

Re: The Return of Moroni? or, RLDS Conference 1895

Post by _palerobber »

RLA:
[T]he false rumor was being spread that the Smiths had dug up—or would dig up—the corpse to fulfill the instructions. Father Smith was evidently pained that the family would be accused of such procedures, and so he took the action necessary to correct the rumor.

...by digging up the corpse!

but seriously, i hadn't considered that the rumor mentioned in the notice may have accused the Smiths themselves of exhuming and dissected the body. Joseph Sr. writes that he dug up the grave with neighbors "for the purpose of ascertaining the truth of such reports," implying that he didn't know whether the rumors were true. therefore, he couldn't have himself been the subject of the rumor, though i suppose Joseph Jr. could have been.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: The Return of Moroni? or, RLDS Conference 1895

Post by _Kishkumen »

palerobber wrote:...by digging up the corpse!

but seriously, i hadn't considered that the rumor mentioned in the notice may have accused the Smiths themselves of exhuming and dissected the body. Joseph Sr. writes that he dug up the grave with neighbors "for the purpose of ascertaining the truth of such reports," implying that he didn't know whether the rumors were true. therefore, he couldn't have himself been the subject of the rumor, though i suppose Joseph Jr. could have been.


If there were such rumors, or they were merely rumors. What better cover than digging him up and claiming it was done to counter such rumors? Seems fishy to me!
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Blixa
_Emeritus
Posts: 8381
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:45 pm

Re: The Return of Moroni? or, RLDS Conference 1895

Post by _Blixa »

Kishkumen wrote:This baby Alvin, according to Joshua McKune, was supposed to translate the Record:

Wesley P. Walters wrote:Joseph had told his neighbor, Joshua McKune, that "his (Smith's) first born child was to translate the characters and hieroglyphics upon the plates, into our language, at the age of three years." (The Susquehanna Register, May 1, 1834, p.1)



Thanks for, uh, digging this up, palerobber and Kish. I was recently trying to summarize this for liz and alter idem and I could not remember what the source for the baby Alvin story was.

Whew! that's a load off of my mind!
From the Ernest L. Wilkinson Diaries: "ELW dreams he's spattered w/ grease. Hundreds steal his greasy pants."
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: The Return of Moroni? or, RLDS Conference 1895

Post by _Kishkumen »

I suppose it could be the case that other members of the Gold Bible Company, knowing that Alvin had to be present to retrieve the Record, considered digging him up to take to the hill. That may have prompted the Smiths to check the integrity of his corpse.

I suppose.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Mary
_Emeritus
Posts: 1774
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 9:45 pm

Re: The Return of Moroni? or, RLDS Conference 1895

Post by _Mary »

MCB wrote:
he more than anyone tried to continue Joseph Smith's legacy in a literal sense.
Agreed. The Straneites were very open about the more bizarre beliefs. http://signaturebooks.com/2010/02/god-h ... t-mormons/ is good, and funny.


Thanks MCB, the book looks interesting.
"It's a little like the Confederate Constitution guaranteeing the freedom to own slaves. Irony doesn't exist for bigots or fanatics." Maksutov
Post Reply