I have brought up this problem that to many like gd have with lack of understanding of science, and what constitutes good evidence. This becomes evident when he links you to such unscientific sites or articles. The only thing that can help is first being more open minded and second maybe take some University courses in some of the hard sciences to get a better back ground.
Maybe you would only accept going back in time and riding one. It certainly is more evidence than the evidence showing that there were none during that time.
gdemetz wrote:Maybe you would only accept going back in time and riding one. It certainly is more evidence than the evidence showing that there were none during that time.
I would accept actual good evidence. Say like horse remains being found by the scientific community showing horse existed during Book of Mormon times. Spanner has brought up a lot of scientific research, and if it had actually shown that horses did exists back then, I would have no problem accepting it. You are the only one here who has an agenda that ignores all evidence, and add to that a real lack of understanding of science and evidence, makes for an ignorant fool.
by the way absence of evidence is evidence of absence in many cases, and in particular these types of cases. How else do they determine if and when a species has disappeared from a region.