LDS Church HQ tells bishop not to report child sex abuse

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_I have a question
_Emeritus
Posts: 9749
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:01 am

LDS Church HQ tells bishop not to report child sex abuse

Post by _I have a question »

Cochise County Court records show the Bisbee bishop cited the clergy exemption as the reason he did not report Paul Adams' abuse to police.

That bishop, John Herrod, told a Department of Homeland Security investigator that after learning of Adams' molestation of his daughter, he sought legal advice from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints headquarters in Salt Lake City.

“The church conveyed that he needs to continue counseling sessions, and that there's no duty to report to authorities due to the clergy-penitent privilege,” Homeland Security Investigations Special Agent John Edwards testified in August 2018.

Edwards also testified that Kim Mauzy, who succeeded Herrod as bishop in the Bisbee Ward, knew about the father's abuse and followed the church directive to not report.

By following that direction, the counseling sessions – and the abuse – continued for years and extended to the couple’s youngest daughter. Court records indicate she was molested as young as 6 weeks old.

Church officials and their attorneys did not return The Republic’s repeated calls seeking comment.
https://eu.azcentral.com/story/news/loc ... 876617001/

Zero tolerance?
_Dr Exiled
_Emeritus
Posts: 3616
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 3:48 am

Re: LDS Church HQ tells bishop not to report child sex abuse

Post by _Dr Exiled »

Wake up mamones. Su iglesia es una mierda.
_Tator
_Emeritus
Posts: 3088
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 9:15 am

Re: LDS Church HQ tells bishop not to report child sex abuse

Post by _Tator »

Truly it is an eff'd up church.

A 6 week old baby, no wonder I believe in the death penalty for pedophiles and I would extend that to anyone covering for a pedophile.
_I have a question
_Emeritus
Posts: 9749
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:01 am

Re: LDS Church HQ tells bishop not to report child sex abuse

Post by _I have a question »

Another outlet takes up the story...
Both girls and their three other siblings have thankfully been adopted, albeit by (separate) families. The wife was later “indicted on 12 criminal counts.” Adams himself was indicted on 11 counts of child sexual abuse, but hanged himself in prison in 2017 while awaiting trial.

The point of retelling this story is to show that the Mormon Church has a history of covering up this sort of abuse, something we’ve written about before. If there’s any way for the LDS Church to deal with a problem internally before it makes its way to the outside world, that’s the preference. But time and time again, they’ve failed to take care of the problems and abuse has thrived.
https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/202 ... to-police/

The article highlights the key question and debate
To force a clergy member to report a confidential communication “changes the whole nature of the confessional,” said state Sen. Eddie Farnsworth, R-Gilbert, and a member of the Mormon Church. Earlier this year, he declined to give a hearing to a bill that sought to further narrow the clergy exemption.

...

The bill, well-intentioned as it might have been, would disrupt centuries of church dogma, said Farnsworth, who as chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee has the authority to decide which bills to consider.
And
However, the victims of Paul Adams are still fighting to change that rule.

“Why would any cleric refuse to report the rape of a child?” [attorney Lynne Cadigan] asked. “If a pedophile knows the cleric will not report his crimes, the cleric is enabling this monster to continue raping children.”
That for me is the key question Mormon Bishops have to ask themselves - do they do what the law and their Church advocates i.e. keeping silent about child sex abuse by their parishioners...Or do they fulfil their moral obligation to protect the children regardless of the other consequences? Perhaps the Church Lawyers that advised the Bishops in these cases to keep their mouths shut and allow the abusers to carry on abusing (and by doing so they became complicit in the abuse) would do well to consider what Jesus might have done in those circumstances...and members would do well to consider that they are sustaining this policy when they raise their right arms twice a year.

The article finishes
The reason the religious institutions don’t want the exemption taken off the books is because they value their secrecy more than others’ safety. Their religious dogma is more important than another child getting sexually abused. Put more simply, they just don’t care. And anyone who belongs to the Catholic Church or LDS Church or any other institution fighting to keep this secrecy in place is enabling the abusers.
Amen
Post Reply