It’s not irrelevant. Oh, you left part of my post out.Marcus wrote: ↑Fri Nov 12, 2021 11:01 pmNo, that's not true, it is not a question at all. Even if the LDS church took in 0% tithing from 100% of its membership, they would still have enough interest income to cover 100% of their operating costs AND have at least 10billion leftover interest to grow their investment hoard even larger. They could do this indefinitely.MG 2.0 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 8:02 pm
60% of church membership is outside of the United States. Hypothetically speaking, if one was to determine whether or not the majority of the church, which exists outside of the U.S., could maintain themselves financially over the long haul without significant financial reserves is literally the billion(s) dollar question.that is irrelevant. See my comment above.
We tend to focus on the 40% rather than the 60%. Personally, I’m comfortable with more financial reserves than less in an international church which sees the U.S. as less than half of its membership. And that trend is more than likely to continue.
This is relevant also.
Europe, including the UK is 3% of church membership. South and Central America are over 30%. So you would have an interesting mix of economic structures holding up the church. As it is, what happens within the 40% of the church that consists of members in the U.S. matters. The financial reserves then become of grater importance. At some point we may see those reserves becoming integral to the overall temporal health of the church.
Regards,
MG