People continue to sign up for religions that ask a lot of them. You would think that they would learn that it just ends up being a real burden that eventually they will want to shake free of. Reminds me of that phrase from "O, Brother, Where Art Thou?": "I guess she was looking for answers." There will always be people out there ready to provide answers for a cost. There may not actually be satisfactory answers to the questions being asked, but someone will always offer to provide answers anyway.Doctor CamNC4Me wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2024 6:20 pmCult, 100%. What part of your life didn’t the church try to control? Sex, food, underwear, dating, reproduction, financials, relationships, speech, mannerism, personal appearance, and so forth. What part about their history haven’t they lied about to maintain this control over others?
- Doc
CWK: What do YOU call the LDS Church?
- Kishkumen
- God
- Posts: 9218
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:37 pm
- Location: Cassius University
- Contact:
Re: CWK: What do YOU call the LDS Church?
"I have learned with what evils tyranny infects a state. For it frustrates all the virtues, robs freedom of its lofty mood, and opens a school of fawning and terror, inasmuch as it leaves matters not to the wisdom of the laws, but to the angry whim of those who are in authority.”
- Gadianton
- God
- Posts: 5470
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:56 pm
- Location: Elsewhere
Re: CWK: What do YOU call the LDS Church?
It's hard to say. The guy is a raging narcissist operating in an information vacuum and we've learned much over the last few years about authoritarian-style leaders acting irrationally -- insisting people call a war a special operation, for instance. It's possible there is a real belief in ones importance such that indeed, it was believed that their say-so would make it so. It's also possible it's an exercise in -- I don't have the word for this -- but there's something about authoritarian leaders making absurd, public, bold pronouncements that perhaps they know nobody buys, but yet, it's would be inappropriate not to insist on it and never back down.Kishkumen wrote:Do you think President Nelson ever truly believed that he would get journalists to call the LDS Church "The Church of Jesus Christ"? It just seems so unlikely. By the way, good catch with that. I had forgotten it. But, then, it is just too bonkers.
We can't take farmers and take all their people and send them back because they don't have maybe what they're supposed to have. They get rid of some of the people who have been there for 25 years and they work great and then you throw them out and they're replaced by criminals.
-
- God
- Posts: 4359
- Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2020 2:15 am
Re: CWK: What do YOU call the LDS Church?
Kotkin's party narrative?
- Gadianton
- God
- Posts: 5470
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:56 pm
- Location: Elsewhere
Re: CWK: What do YOU call the LDS Church?
lol, yeah man, that's probably it.
We can't take farmers and take all their people and send them back because they don't have maybe what they're supposed to have. They get rid of some of the people who have been there for 25 years and they work great and then you throw them out and they're replaced by criminals.
- Moksha
- God
- Posts: 7913
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:13 am
- Location: Koloburbia
Re: CWK: What do YOU call the LDS Church?
Or one of the religious groups not in communion with the broader Christian family. That would be like the small group of Blue Martians declaring they represent all of Martianity when they are not even invited to the tea ceremonies.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
- Kishkumen
- God
- Posts: 9218
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:37 pm
- Location: Cassius University
- Contact:
Re: CWK: What do YOU call the LDS Church?
It almost looks like an attempt to manufacture grievance.Gadianton wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2024 11:45 pmIt's hard to say. The guy is a raging narcissist operating in an information vacuum and we've learned much over the last few years about authoritarian-style leaders acting irrationally -- insisting people call a war a special operation, for instance. It's possible there is a real belief in ones importance such that indeed, it was believed that their say-so would make it so. It's also possible it's an exercise in -- I don't have the word for this -- but there's something about authoritarian leaders making absurd, public, bold pronouncements that perhaps they know nobody buys, but yet, it's would be inappropriate not to insist on it and never back down.
"I have learned with what evils tyranny infects a state. For it frustrates all the virtues, robs freedom of its lofty mood, and opens a school of fawning and terror, inasmuch as it leaves matters not to the wisdom of the laws, but to the angry whim of those who are in authority.”
- Gadianton
- God
- Posts: 5470
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:56 pm
- Location: Elsewhere
Re: CWK: What do YOU call the LDS Church?
I'd say you and H are on to something. Another example, when Xi Jinping produces world maps with China's border taking big chunks away from all of its neighbors. And then refers to in in earnest, confused as to why anybody would disagree.k wrote:It almost looks like an attempt to manufacture grievance.
We can't take farmers and take all their people and send them back because they don't have maybe what they're supposed to have. They get rid of some of the people who have been there for 25 years and they work great and then you throw them out and they're replaced by criminals.