I don’t blame you for paying no mind to the apologetics.
I'm also careful with critics because they also make mistakes and are capable of being deceitful in their presentations, whether written or oral. Critics must be held to the same standard -- tell the truth and confess when you don't.
At this juncture, I raise the question that begs to know if RFM (who has studied Book of Abraham apologetics for decades), knowingly botched things up in his podcast while yapping about a dog being the cow. Did RFM lie or was he just being dumb?
RFM wrote:...because if he doesn't say anything about it, then he's in the tank and doesn't care whether it's true. He has to correct himself and acknowledge it...
Bill Reel wrote: ...notice how easily you corrected yourself, or allowed yourself to be corrected when you get it wrong. This is all we're saying...Just own it...Just acknowledge that Mormonism Live pointed something out and we're not going to do that thing anymore...
The Prophet Joseph Smith’s explanations of the three facsimiles in the book of Abraham are scripture and should be studied along with the rest of the book. There are no official Church explanations for the Abraham facsimiles besides the Prophet Joseph Smith’s explanations that accompany them.
MG, take *your* Book of Abraham and shove it where the sun don't shine, you liar.
Same Goes for John Gee & Kerry Muhlestein, and the rest of the dirty rotten lying Mormons who think they are so damn smart. That includes you too, Ed Goble -- you freak.
The Book of Abraham has been destroyed! So says Shulem!
