Peterson tries to excuse himself from the Priesthood Ban era

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
User avatar
MsJack
Deacon
Posts: 237
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 8:27 am
Location: Des Plaines, IL, USA
Contact:

Re: Peterson tries to excuse himself from the Priesthood Ban era

Post by MsJack »

drumdude wrote:
Fri May 29, 2026 3:04 pm
Back in 2012, a BYU professor got in trouble for saying the quiet parts out loud.
Randy Bott getting forced into early retirement for sharing a view of the priesthood ban that he had (a) always openly taught and (b) still wasn't nearly as bad as things top Mormon leaders taught, remains one of the saddest incidents I have ever seen in Mormon academia.

Talk about someone who didn't deserve to be canceled.
BA, Classics, Brigham Young University
MA, American Religious History, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School
PhD Candidate, Church History, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School
User avatar
Dr. Shades
Founder and Visionary
Posts: 3191
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:48 pm
Contact:

Re: Peterson tries to excuse himself from the Priesthood Ban era

Post by Dr. Shades »

MsJack wrote:
Mon Jun 01, 2026 6:32 pm
drumdude wrote:
Fri May 29, 2026 3:04 pm
Back in 2012, a BYU professor got in trouble for saying the quiet parts out loud.
Randy Bott getting forced into early retirement for sharing a view of the priesthood ban that he had (a) always openly taught and (b) still wasn't nearly as bad as things top Mormon leaders taught, remains one of the saddest incidents I have ever seen in Mormon academia.

Talk about someone who didn't deserve to be canceled.
The dude should've known better. He HAD to have been aware of the church's efforts to sweep the whole thing under the rug.
.
"When the Mormon God requires a PR crisis to act moral, we've clearly outgrown him."

--Everybody Wang Chung, 06-01-2026
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 4139
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: Peterson tries to excuse himself from the Priesthood Ban era

Post by I Have Questions »

Dr. Shades wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2026 7:46 am
MsJack wrote:
Mon Jun 01, 2026 6:32 pm
Randy Bott getting forced into early retirement for sharing a view of the priesthood ban that he had (a) always openly taught and (b) still wasn't nearly as bad as things top Mormon leaders taught, remains one of the saddest incidents I have ever seen in Mormon academia.

Talk about someone who didn't deserve to be canceled.
The dude should've known better. He HAD to have been aware of the church's efforts to sweep the whole thing under the rug.
So you’re saying he should have kept quiet and gone along to get along?
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
User avatar
Dr. Shades
Founder and Visionary
Posts: 3191
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:48 pm
Contact:

Re: Peterson tries to excuse himself from the Priesthood Ban era

Post by Dr. Shades »

I Have Questions wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2026 10:02 am
Dr. Shades wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2026 7:46 am
The dude should've known better. He HAD to have been aware of the church's efforts to sweep the whole thing under the rug.
So you’re saying he should have kept quiet and gone along to get along?
No; I'm saying he shouldn't have been the least bit surprised when an ultra-authoritarian organization delivered the smackdown on him for embarrassing it.
.
"When the Mormon God requires a PR crisis to act moral, we've clearly outgrown him."

--Everybody Wang Chung, 06-01-2026
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 8677
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

Re: Peterson tries to excuse himself from the Priesthood Ban era

Post by Shulem »

Dr. Shades wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2026 2:23 pm
I Have Questions wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2026 10:02 am
So you’re saying he should have kept quiet and gone along to get along?
No; I'm saying he shouldn't have been the least bit surprised when an ultra-authoritarian organization delivered the smackdown on him for embarrassing it.

Exactly, because being a member of the cult requires you keep the rules, both the written and unwritten rules. Otherwise, you'll have to pay the price. Being a member of the church is slavery to the system. You can think for yourself but you can't say it outload.
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 8677
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

Re: Peterson tries to excuse himself from the Priesthood Ban era

Post by Shulem »

I Have Questions wrote:
Fri May 29, 2026 8:43 am
...Peterson raises the hot button topic of the Priesthood Ban...
Racist Peterson wrote:I’ve had a few critics claim that I’m lying about this, just as I lie about almost everything else.
Peterson will lie, cheat, and steal in order to defend Book of Abraham racism and the wanton act of Smith hacking off Anubis's face in order to produce his fictitious slave for the narrative in the Facsimile.

Peterson is a liar! He admits the Narmer Palette was created in 3000 BC to commemorate the Unification of Upper and Lower Egypt, yet the Mormon church has always taught that Egypt was founded *after* the flood in 2400 BC.

So, yeah, Peterson is just another Mormon liar who deserves what he gets. He is not to be trusted. He does not know how to tell the truth.
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 4139
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: Peterson tries to excuse himself from the Priesthood Ban era

Post by I Have Questions »

Dr. Shades wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2026 2:23 pm
I Have Questions wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2026 10:02 am
So you’re saying he should have kept quiet and gone along to get along?
No; I'm saying he shouldn't have been the least bit surprised when an ultra-authoritarian organization delivered the smackdown on him for embarrassing it.
Why have you concluded that he was surprised?
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Post Reply