The Truth About MDB.

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Ray A

Post by _Ray A »

Was Randy a "smart ass" combination?:

So, just for the (ah-hem) record, *removed privacy violation* is protesting his name being used here in conjunction with the moniker "Dr. Shades"?

He and Lady Sundancer (who now calls herself Vicki and Jersey Girl) are trying to tell the moderators here what rules they should have and how to apply them on someone else's board?

And then Jason "Dr Shades" *removed privacy violation* is sending PMs and emails to the moderators here telling them what to do with content posted on their message board? Demanding that they delete (i.e., censor) his name being associated with Dr. Shades from their board?

Hmmm, Does *removed privacy violation* have special privileges? Did he give up a reasonable expectation of his in real life identity being associated with the moniker "Dr. Shades" when *he* opted to speak at the Sunstone conference in 2004 under his in real life name? Especially significant because he first "floated" his Internet/Chapel Mormon theory on the internet as Dr. Shades? Could *removed privacy violation* and "Dr. Shades" now be permanently linked together as a result of *his* own decisions to promote his pet theory under both his internet moniker and his in real life name? Is his decision to do so now biting him in his ass?

There is good reason to believe so if it is at all proportionate to his begging, whining, and howlingabout it.

Is Jason really trying to control the entire internet (or, at least, the internet beyond the which he specifically has control)?

He's been doing this via PMs and Emails, yet just today, Dr. Shades posted this on his blog (here) about moderators on another mb:

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...Paranoia, anyone?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

and

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
... moderators [on another mb] aren't above banning people for merely participating on other boards, of all things! If that doesn't scream out "control freaks," I don't know what does.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Just what does your behaviour scream, Jason? Paranoia? Control Freak? Fear? Narcissism? Hypocrite?

All of the above?

You decide.
_Ray A

Post by _Ray A »

Dr. Shades wrote:
Ray A wrote:Then what does THIS mean on your ezyboard account: http://p094.ezboard.com/ugasonjallentin ... bannedPage


It means that the "Gason Jallentine" sock-puppet account was banned, just like I told you.


And Juliann created this account.

Pigs fly.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Ray A wrote:Was Randy a "smart ass" combination?:


I don't know--I rather doubt it--but it was a sock-puppet.

Dr. Shades wrote:
Ray A wrote:It means that the "Gason Jallentine" sock-puppet account was banned, just like I told you.


And Juliann created this account.

Pigs fly.


Well, it still means that that sock-puppet was banned, just like I told you.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Ray A

Post by _Ray A »

by the way, is there any reason why my PM sent to a poster on this board is STILL in "outbox"?

Keene! Board guru. Any explanations? Never happened before.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Ray A wrote:by the way, is there any reason why my PM sent to a poster on this board is STILL in "outbox"?

Keene! Board guru. Any explanations? Never happened before.


It still displays in the "outbox" until the addressee opens it, at which time you'll see it in your "sentbox."
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Imwashingmypirate
_Emeritus
Posts: 2290
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 10:45 pm

Post by _Imwashingmypirate »

Shades I believe you.

I am never going out again. EVER!!!. Every time I go out I get myself in a pickle. *CRINGE*. Grrrrr... What the heck is the point??? I think I will be dying for at least a month. Ever done something you really regret?
Just punched myself on the face...
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Imwashingmypirate wrote:Shades I believe you.


Thank you. To be frank, those messages are so over-the-top I can't believe anyone would think they're from me. If nothing else, the six smilies in a row should've been an automatic dead giveaway that the poster wasn't me.

Ever done something you really regret?


Yeah. More times than I can count.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Ray A

Post by _Ray A »

Dr. Shades wrote:Thank you. To be frank, those messages are so over-the-top I can't believe anyone would think they're from me. If nothing else, the six smilies in a row should've been an automatic dead giveaway that the poster wasn't me.

Scratch-o-mania here? Not from you? Who else would know Keene this well? WHO else would link to what keene quoted? Juliann? (Swallows camel).
_Ray A

Post by _Ray A »

Now I understand why you, and Keene, are covering up Scratch's blatant distortion of his PMs to make him look "innocent". You and Scratch are like Bonnie and Clyde.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Ray A wrote:
Dr. Shades wrote:Thank you. To be frank, those messages are so over-the-top I can't believe anyone would think they're from me. If nothing else, the six smilies in a row should've been an automatic dead giveaway that the poster wasn't me.


Scratch-o-mania here? Not from you? Who else would know Keene this well? WHO else would link to what keene quoted? Juliann? (Swallows camel).


You don't have to know Keene in order to mention him. Keene had already been mentioned, repeatedly, as the owner and chief administrator of this site. He had already made his infamous "Special Olympics" post. All Juliann had to do was copy-&-paste. She didn't have to know him.

Besides, if I really did intend to be so one-sided and unFAIR with the running of this message board, do you really think I'd go and blab it all over ZLMB for all the world to see? And even if I did do that, why would I register a sock-puppet in order to do it? And even if I did that, why on God's green earth would I register a variation of my own first and last name as a sock-puppet??? Kind of defeats the whole idea of sock-puppetry, doesn't it?

C'mon, give me some credit. I may be stupid, but I'm not that stupid.

Now I understand why you, and Keene, are covering up Scratch's blatant distortion of his PMs to make him look "innocent". You and Scratch are like Bonnie and Clyde.


I'm not "covering up" anything. Looking at PMs requires FTP access and database knowledge that I simply don't have. Put another way, I DO NOT HAVE THE PHYSICAL ABILITY TO LOOK AT PEOPLE'S PRIVATE MESSAGES. If you want something done on that front, Keene is the first, last, and only one to talk to.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
Post Reply