rcrocket wrote:Dr. Shades wrote:My thoughts are that I wish I was your kid so I could have everything in life handed to me for free.
That's nasty and untrue.
No, it is not nasty, and no, it is not untrue--and you know it.
At least I don't advise people on this Board to lie to their wives about income and assets in the middle of divorce proceedings.
Neither do I.
Those with even a rudimentary comprehension of the English language could--and did--clearly see that I was advising Scottie to conceal his raise
while there were still NO legal proceedings going on. In other words, their divorce was already final, and along with it, all alimony fixations. Thanks to the fact that she discovered that he got a raise, she wanted to take him back to court. In other words, they were BETWEEN proceedings. They were NOT "in the middle of divorce proceedings," as everyone but you fully comprehended.
I consider that pretty offensive.
It might have been, if that's what I had actually done--which I didn't.
You've got terrible character.
And you're far, far too stupid to practice law.
Now I see why you've deleted the old history on this Board; I can't call up that thread and your post where you did such a nefarious thing.
You, sir, are a blatant liar, for I have never done such a thing (as you yourself very well know). I wonder--is such a blatant breach of ethics actionable under the California Bar Association?
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
--Louis Midgley