GoodK wrote:But certainly you can see the vast difference between the filthy lies Bishop Peterson spread and my satire-lite version of HST's Ibogaine Effect story.
Yes. He's a "depraved", lowlife Mormon apologist and you are a victim of the "oppressive" Mormon church. (I don't mean that the boy's ranch didn't mistreat you).
Now excuse me while I watch paint dry . . . on the surface of my cornea. I find it much more entertaining than arguing about Daniel Peterson's ethics with respect to Michael Quinn or even with respect to his "experiment".
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy. eritis sicut dii I support NCMO
asbestosman wrote:Now excuse me while I watch paint dry . . . on the surface of my cornea. I find it much more entertaining than arguing about Daniel Peterson's ethics with respect to Michael Quinn or even with respect to his "experiment".
You must post a lot on threads involving paint drying on your cornea, eh?
Mister Scratch wrote:I denounce this behavior. I don't think it's right to post blatant falsehoods and then to later retract them as if they were "experiments" meant to reveal some sort of imaginary "double standard."
Mister Scratch:
You are right. As much as it pains me to concede anything to you, I feel as though my actions warrant an apology.
GoodK:
I admire your honesty and integrity. You are a real model for all of us. Bless you.
I admire your honesty and integrity. You are a real model for all of us. Bless you.
Why don't we have a vomit emoticon?
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics "I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
Shouldn't this whole thread be removed? Whether its a pun or spoof or satire, damage can be done to Dr. Peterson's character. No one should be able to make a serious accusation and then say "Oh, just kidding". I would think just out of decency the whole thing should be removed. Bad form, totally bad form.
“A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take away everything that you have.”
Black Moclips wrote:Shouldn't this whole thread be removed? Whether its a pun or spoof or satire, damage can be done to Dr. Peterson's character. No one should be able to make a serious accusation and then say "Oh, just kidding". I would think just out of decency the whole thing should be removed. Bad form, totally bad form.
I thought 5-MEO-AMT might have been the formula for Krispy Kremes.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
